From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com (mail-lf1-f50.google.com [209.85.167.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551321822EF for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719407586; cv=none; b=jRYDQS7DFWv/Qxc+3kTfEOyk0fI0xN0PQDiuV6+teaRBtdaHCldTMeKXK8B2hcxQavV+ZGXGXpB6o9cNo6wTVm5vKxFrHDmuV9Wvf6eah12K+7Fr8je9PB6PNJMn9d9tqAdKd+0KccPqU7qCJ5ur3cObyyTYagh2u+x4j/JLyk4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719407586; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o4ZK/GG6lXAN1cfDXgIpVYZWTFwSck3jVd1HEtW4i7A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=bYNgITYeC9i9irgPBvgPRmSELm6W8IOWu8GUMdI40Z+4PVmKd+5BxCzfKjw471j3AQcMPcuHCeDJ6td735hNbwuKR7kSozjVtv7SH9uW+3VW/BvJHWU+zVK2ChXEz+mc1WNFQWfWI6p8ZqXxFNZcHx8/2zeqVRcXoc5tbag8eI4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=m6Nne5tF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="m6Nne5tF" Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52cdf4bc083so6629315e87.2 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:13:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1719407582; x=1720012382; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JpMFH6VmSNUk91jIQ+0kjGx11FiPCz2ltKgHshZWUPg=; b=m6Nne5tF+i3AUVd9OkXw8T+zBdar7p8xvpQ0XgPDGlHyhGFuI5tTmVhyx3IRrwce5y SjnbU5Gy2sJQIQvCDr5ZPa9f1AJWSLzCvMSDA5nY04BiBsuqf6VXJksMGUHIP/lJD1vp 97GlAqL2mBu2s2vTMeOpryhlKOm5s8CZRgS7yASiOA7BpQuZIGqFEFfA1YHdZDaVyZYI SdXcQc5sntK993MTS9472QOoIOmN6UPwWz5kuQY9NzmoNRTl8SgxyFOug+4y5MHFZBhr owLWx6g/TezTjt2HsY9VAzn6k9jQAWVyky9PKZFOUpNttEv6cgLAW3q8MgM7qb9yJ7QQ oF5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719407582; x=1720012382; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JpMFH6VmSNUk91jIQ+0kjGx11FiPCz2ltKgHshZWUPg=; b=fquKMs7/dVqWL8jPPB6A5oyCUlupviPK8BaAeneabcYYQ0zq1saaeyrraJF7mUfMEI dMXifcuqzN9AK++BKGSKviW2X5xbIgH7KbpRCbZc3csZeFWLc/3AUl/jLflber76tN11 4nDh8lKbtF+FOiNXhEBfBJ39vfLuiy5WYbjIoGMnP9fjwYLCBdA0bY5ny9Q/LwrXLwjo /QwvicYYLPZHIVP5bTKAUT2OoFneRVctMUHdI08AamUuVNAtYZ1IZw3DjRWZ6YT26KSa tiomVuW5dUq6zp6D8vKu6uJQuSUI5EtNJXSGQ4xGtgjRrwe8Dr+dEuysKlxrYV54Q8hW l/QA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVRQWNMINdTgMQX1Ltos5EhmJMVcLU8cO5FoNdvXFbO8ERgqF+osSxMNQtEbJN4XgHp8j5l+zDiz+CBvPASPcuzd+l7To80/M20 X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwSAswKv5H0sU212oXnRyunPiJJ8AU17GXZq6s1FBRqfzjKCps1 uZ0K0eHVZldpPbPI1/KDkH/HIn05lN5SAijDpv4XUm1jjXKnePvIAyhriyZHVzY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJ9B27bdcSX0Wfqr/hDP4pnXMetZ6wPAy775G8aSk8a7BY3E+tTCNDaFLKsaqnc6by2wVkZg== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5984:0:b0:52c:caaf:6905 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52ce0646921mr7674671e87.58.1719407582367; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (amontpellier-656-1-456-62.w92-145.abo.wanadoo.fr. [92.145.124.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3663a2f6977sm15857663f8f.80.2024.06.26.06.13.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 06:13:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexandre Ghiti To: Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Andrea Parri , Nathan Chancellor , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Arnd Bergmann , Leonardo Bras , Guo Ren , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Guo Ren Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] asm-generic: ticket-lock: Add separate ticket-lock.h Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:03:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20240626130347.520750-10-alexghiti@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240626130347.520750-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com> References: <20240626130347.520750-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Guo Ren Add a separate ticket-lock.h to include multiple spinlock versions and select one at compile time or runtime. Reviewed-by: Leonardo Bras Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/CAK8P3a2rnz9mQqhN6-e0CGUUv9rntRELFdxt_weiD7FxH7fkfQ@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Guo Ren Signed-off-by: Guo Ren --- include/asm-generic/spinlock.h | 87 +--------------------- include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h diff --git a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h index 4773334ee638..970590baf61b 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/spinlock.h @@ -1,94 +1,9 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ -/* - * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation. - * - * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress - * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick - * to a test-and-set lock. - * - * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a - * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although - * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications - * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with - * a test-and-set. - * - * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence - * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with - * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc - * atomic_cond_read_acquire(). - * - * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the - * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word - * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example). - * - */ - #ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H #define __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H -#include -#include - -static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val); - u16 ticket = val >> 16; - - if (ticket == (u16)val) - return; - - /* - * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a - * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence. We only - * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from - * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we - * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra - * orderings are free. - */ - atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL); - smp_mb(); -} - -static __always_inline bool arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val); - - if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff)) - return false; - - return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */ -} - -static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN); - u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val); - - smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1); -} - -static __always_inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock) -{ - u32 val = lock.val.counter; - - return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff)); -} - -static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock); - - return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(val); -} - -static __always_inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock) -{ - u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val); - - return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1; -} - +#include #include #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK_H */ diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cfcff22b37b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket_spinlock.h @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +/* + * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation. + * + * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress + * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick + * to a test-and-set lock. + * + * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a + * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although + * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications + * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with + * a test-and-set. + * + * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence + * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is RCsc to create an RCsc hot path, along with + * a full fence after the spin to upgrade the otherwise-RCpc + * atomic_cond_read_acquire(). + * + * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the + * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word + * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example). + * + */ + +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H + +#include +#include + +static __always_inline void ticket_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, &lock->val); + u16 ticket = val >> 16; + + if (ticket == (u16)val) + return; + + /* + * atomic_cond_read_acquire() is RCpc, but rather than defining a + * custom cond_read_rcsc() here we just emit a full fence. We only + * need the prior reads before subsequent writes ordering from + * smb_mb(), but as atomic_cond_read_acquire() just emits reads and we + * have no outstanding writes due to the atomic_fetch_add() the extra + * orderings are free. + */ + atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, ticket == (u16)VAL); + smp_mb(); +} + +static __always_inline bool ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + u32 old = atomic_read(&lock->val); + + if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff)) + return false; + + return atomic_try_cmpxchg(&lock->val, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */ +} + +static __always_inline void ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN); + u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val); + + smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1); +} + +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock) +{ + u32 val = lock.val.counter; + + return ((val >> 16) == (val & 0xffff)); +} + +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + arch_spinlock_t val = READ_ONCE(*lock); + + return !ticket_spin_value_unlocked(val); +} + +static __always_inline int ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock) +{ + u32 val = atomic_read(&lock->val); + + return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1; +} + +/* + * Remapping spinlock architecture specific functions to the corresponding + * ticket spinlock functions. + */ +#define arch_spin_is_locked(l) ticket_spin_is_locked(l) +#define arch_spin_is_contended(l) ticket_spin_is_contended(l) +#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l) ticket_spin_value_unlocked(l) +#define arch_spin_lock(l) ticket_spin_lock(l) +#define arch_spin_trylock(l) ticket_spin_trylock(l) +#define arch_spin_unlock(l) ticket_spin_unlock(l) + +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_SPINLOCK_H */ -- 2.39.2