From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8B913AD3F; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:29:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724664574; cv=none; b=G1PIABKf2qZSdtfSInllpp6jE8ptTX3TIm0Z8zqz2iwMvvaFDMheC7UPnKKJPCefYGWGR+Rp2NrlO/a6qMKj9YhZHzbSTqUiw8iLlzj6Ygdv1qSn9iqwDwJZKt0h/vZDSMkyMr+rnqlgQRQBgY3u93+GhWdPJJSV34A8U9NDbcc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724664574; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yFtaOyJ3oZbhPtFgbua649+GIjQJIk5xntNn98+IQR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uxXLcEQxB3q1N4lGpfm/vJ3h2vYxDhU9pN7jjNTzgaSrKQovEtdXxvNtQwiZK2SqPSNihTZY5+BDblVTPPrWPo6Vm1NPDuGulA0jTYvXdRanpR2PRo6niewLgttBxdSxbjc7jOZg6wkNYTOh04LOftkcEQeaJQ4ellydD3ICTOQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OqULYCcM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OqULYCcM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E477C8403F; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 09:29:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724664574; bh=yFtaOyJ3oZbhPtFgbua649+GIjQJIk5xntNn98+IQR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OqULYCcMB+OSTkFPTgm+yOBeUzxkwxkyBwtdmIel/WsSxWu2ZNlIDHXQNcKmPA5bK 4hRiAhEiGpArK0PjhFbOS9puXePcIzL5fY1n+Uhtms88TEmiHlzEkF+EmHQfiScsZa jyUVeB0M58jZnFjXyji46f0W+Xj1oic90Vi3P1IuewwiFQPbwhBAhGRNN98gI8YvDK abwRya7rGwmYBdSVt0TZcjg4gd8MsJP62mGsdoKed0HPAddBx0Kzqrgv7q8yVk7Pwx R37iDvoyS7gcHBwQhL/sZSmWoEWApOJ5PTNqPqeWN4Ciyt/Kz8JWv8MO21N/1nE0m3 zJ+JaYq2NCuJg== Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 10:29:21 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Esteban Blanc Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Michael Hennerich , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Nuno Sa , Jonathan Corbet , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] iio: adc: ad4030: add support for ad4632-16 and ad4632-24 Message-ID: <20240826102921.1c897357@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20240822-eblanc-ad4630_v1-v1-5-5c68f3327fdd@baylibre.com> References: <20240822-eblanc-ad4630_v1-v1-0-5c68f3327fdd@baylibre.com> <20240822-eblanc-ad4630_v1-v1-5-5c68f3327fdd@baylibre.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:45:21 +0200 Esteban Blanc wrote: > AD4632-24 and AD4632-16 are 2 channels ADCs. Both channels are > interleaved bit per bit on SDO line. > > Both of them do not have evaluation board. As such, the support added > here can't be tested. Support is provided as best effort until someone get > their hands on one. > > Signed-off-by: Esteban Blanc This looks fine to me.