From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lj1-f225.google.com (mail-lj1-f225.google.com [209.85.208.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6441DDC34 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.225 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728325475; cv=none; b=dawZ4t4GOFjeDBtXzlJPXdpBUGj9KrO/bB+ytUwhX+nz3oIzQaGc1ammMCQhlUxvRYCRe0a4qaPdGMOJugIk1mDPYqCB0tL721iP86WLqFtBedxJoD9FCXq8btDOBakn1FnwgmOBzobgBssIlzg/+yKFAT3keUfai6Ji6eQ8Gro= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728325475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vGyCPabMAbOh+4jbtzjEEtcRZNRpv9x7chfzociw/IQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=i6Cnfv9uflAy0Lfjcj98WXelUVrn5JFO6zIKNpwoZ/nd62JrthnIBb2TE+3sLTq1t6Ef9HIFsGQcWKoRh1NXKveHO7AOIFkYp81CcIgxbz7/SxLHZvxW8ZZfwYKCb4JVK0yal/gnEVnkuhI85Zh+YdeP/trAxGGRodQAmJpCd/8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=purestorage.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=purestorage.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purestorage.com header.i=@purestorage.com header.b=DbXwFhFp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.225 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=purestorage.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=purestorage.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=purestorage.com header.i=@purestorage.com header.b="DbXwFhFp" Received: by mail-lj1-f225.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2fadb636abaso46809121fa.3 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:24:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=purestorage.com; s=google2022; t=1728325472; x=1728930272; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pV02ciEJA9IyAtmxJn8482aGKbVkirPtp9fOh2sSSus=; b=DbXwFhFp2WvjBXtl7UEt42sho6gORgPdbfjjwa7w3GnQjSmaUIhAjCIV8NKuOFDn67 1A2EO/kQ5eqZ+Twr5bxbGTY7ZBkgDNyu04KjV1dh3H5bW3D4FNjJoPfDJ8CGOeAkwI76 qdP7vgLVcru5MqG5xZ5h1mmNPXrOMkzKXSav6McJ9EO0ZINqrzz4hIkfG/DfCj2w5HSq jRbaGrytB7tDuM/54r1T/uKVXsx7QVzEXtQhEO+VNo/DXenw1y1WQNaWI8xWVHZsW5lu A9O4K+eeRzVWHp+t5YvpEPxuey87/gXjDCDfonjBd60AFkc4gykrZ84EZjUTBAkgmewv mWCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728325472; x=1728930272; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pV02ciEJA9IyAtmxJn8482aGKbVkirPtp9fOh2sSSus=; b=AtDO1rzlwp9aWadAohQ4ZVssIdzOZPNMPwuOG2slCyiX83CgcQmjsE2ANcaQ96owZ6 lxgPYtEHZFPVVe/J+qfsAS+hq0NSQaiyGaS3IHHfl/K0mwykOmPu3N1xerrYmC7Nb8MV lrJfD8ErocxWsgiPH4RCwsM2q7KyWC5GmMy84gXYB/5N2Mr+gTTjfd5XtOUfSxUXPemJ fywvZARzJk2UPu4aiXGOtzTZrjID2b3adzshVW2r8qf/6KaWB1RDjJauw5GMMHnIrlAo M2srlxkRbuqocpqQbFaInBoRcgf7kMyNMOu6a9wVusmc9YV+xYDMzmpwS4MsNvFElILE MnbQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXWmLL1LOGPkzajO8wxPEaTN6FKHu8IV+DuPWkJ0Xj2tG9ahbcr2XkBodOrVzyp4rrx4ZH7sB1w1cw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXzIKhSijFb5jdDPZGQgIrwofTn5jy9Ze+HWMXOQLIFKiCC5uy iKQVCbmAlYHx313a+9glq2HU3cyvUodpAFGywT07WupNduNkBp1wjyl9PZNqTKOMUNXpUMe9fyY 3my5NNaPGdznnz/iFateIEqnjgOrRmw6n X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGrVvDsKQOxqj+lfsL0Jj2PQJAKrxu587qjLPVFyw24AbNaEqKpQYNkS23cVwhqDr/CB4s8MFzLwLd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:159d:b0:536:53a9:96d5 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539ab866484mr5825828e87.17.1728325471874; Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c7-smtp-2023.dev.purestorage.com ([208.88.159.129]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 2adb3069b0e04-539afec199asm167836e87.17.2024.10.07.11.24.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:24:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Relaying-Domain: purestorage.com Received: from dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com (dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com [IPv6:2620:125:9007:640:7:70:36:0]) by c7-smtp-2023.dev.purestorage.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B094340CD2; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:24:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: by dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com (Postfix, from userid 1557716368) id 2889DE4062A; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:24:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Uday Shankar To: Ming Lei , Jens Axboe , Jonathan Corbet Cc: Uday Shankar , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] ublk: check recovery flags for validity Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:24:14 -0600 Message-Id: <20241007182419.3263186-2-ushankar@purestorage.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241007182419.3263186-1-ushankar@purestorage.com> References: <20241007182419.3263186-1-ushankar@purestorage.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Setting UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE without also setting UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY is currently silently equivalent to not setting any recovery flags at all, even though that's obviously not intended. Check for this case and fail add_dev (with a paranoid warning to aid debugging any program which might rely on the old behavior) with EINVAL if it is detected. Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar Reviewed-by: Ming Lei --- drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c index a6c8e5cc6051..318a4dfe8266 100644 --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ | UBLK_F_USER_COPY \ | UBLK_F_ZONED) +#define UBLK_F_ALL_RECOVERY_FLAGS (UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY \ + | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE) + /* All UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_* should be included here */ #define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL \ (UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD | \ @@ -2372,6 +2375,14 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd) else if (!(info.flags & UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV)) return -EPERM; + /* forbid nonsense combinations of recovery flags */ + if ((info.flags & UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE) && + !(info.flags & UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY)) { + pr_warn("%s: invalid recovery flags %llx\n", __func__, + info.flags & UBLK_F_ALL_RECOVERY_FLAGS); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* * unprivileged device can't be trusted, but RECOVERY and * RECOVERY_REISSUE still may hang error handling, so can't -- 2.34.1