From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03801C1F0B; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731097224; cv=none; b=mDfFuOgDhrFdcWKlZ+gmGF4xmuj7QzznwzwEDJ0VMT2qEM8mwNg9idJ8V61D9D7hjWjyFFtnUS2Z8qX1G+BGZyPZF/GNx/u7ORC3doafQCb3Y4mlbfegCazXbCg057w9MGKrWJqY/5fygXN8ptLBwbKbHXDW0hiYiCI1bSEKpUo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731097224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Cex5OFKLdepISNlr/zMsoMKZr4c1wz925xujO/RtmjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UCCLB2ZfBv2gCpg2ED7qVL9rsyAHyv5IZ4iFT7my7rr8Kuhgg3wTM96yOdk38PGhHTxaxu3LXIOXI0ofbgSqCj22Qi1h28qtyK5vyBlWBWBxHFJTcAIkbOnLrQKqryhc6NTlCHHl63IzKJgSppYZ9HrwKjEaDMufTqcanqQqANQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YIfSu7OZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YIfSu7OZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731097222; x=1762633222; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Cex5OFKLdepISNlr/zMsoMKZr4c1wz925xujO/RtmjM=; b=YIfSu7OZlO0S5pIz0+o6DcB5cBXet2ETi1kIEf6ZEaMeHuhHrPG4fZ3u EWicq8pafqNLZZSJCqKuCKKcRVIHQXOwa7mmlkf+yWWkCJWF2q/gij2Hd qP8bzGJ/qEBX+piki0impNfyyp6SHpd3xawE/TgYfOG9q//mnOQ1sUYGn wF3+Jn+qSjyhfVRRqDeZauPPEU71cXKmMjfYQYIy5WjN4RFBIkK3TLNeM uyxd94ayyJO+dQ7UcyTgeVZYw99tIMOY7j7DZaOgma6405KZw38ZHOeAX 6Nz7sLq0pa8lzSuXWM/G/wvIzfPVvzBph2iEbfoysXSTlzQRDPO8A67Ac A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xczEsJKSSFanVlUJGMjgsA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QHkkMecFS9Wm/niKD+UYNA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11250"; a="34780330" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,138,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="34780330" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2024 12:20:21 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: z9jpa/nIQaS3xVbzK89FJg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RntjX9eYQR62U2yHDkNiXQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,138,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90835236" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2024 12:20:17 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t9VSo-000rlS-2Y; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 20:20:14 +0000 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 04:19:54 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yoshihiro Furudera , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Andersson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dmitry Baryshkov , Konrad Dybcio , Neil Armstrong , Arnd Bergmann , =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=EDcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E?= Prado , Thomas Gleixner , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Fujitsu: Add the Uncore MAC PMU driver Message-ID: <202411090451.quuiocP9-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241108054006.2550856-2-fj5100bi@fujitsu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108054006.2550856-2-fj5100bi@fujitsu.com> Hi Yoshihiro, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/smp/core] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc6] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm-perf/for-next/perf next-20241108] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yoshihiro-Furudera/perf-Fujitsu-Add-the-Uncore-MAC-PMU-driver/20241108-134245 base: tip/smp/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108054006.2550856-2-fj5100bi%40fujitsu.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Fujitsu: Add the Uncore MAC PMU driver config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241109/202411090451.quuiocP9-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241109/202411090451.quuiocP9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411090451.quuiocP9-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/perf/fujitsu_mac_pmu.c:604:36: warning: 'fujitsu_mac_pmu_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 604 | static const struct acpi_device_id fujitsu_mac_pmu_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/fujitsu_mac_pmu_acpi_match +604 drivers/perf/fujitsu_mac_pmu.c 603 > 604 static const struct acpi_device_id fujitsu_mac_pmu_acpi_match[] = { 605 { "FUJI200C", }, 606 { } 607 }; 608 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, fujitsu_mac_pmu_acpi_match); 609 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki