* [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos
@ 2024-12-09 13:06 Andrew Kreimer
2024-12-11 4:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 15:42 ` Jonathan Corbet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Kreimer @ 2024-12-09 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Jonathan Corbet
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors,
Andrew Kreimer
There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
index dae78dfa7cdc..c700dde9259c 100644
--- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
+++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
@@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ checking* and *theorem proving*) with a more practical approach for complex
systems.
Instead of relying on a fine-grained model of a system (e.g., a
-re-implementation a instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
+re-implementation at instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of
the system behavior.
The main advantage is that RV can give precise information on the runtime
behavior of the monitored system, without the pitfalls of developing models
that require a re-implementation of the entire system in a modeling language.
-Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible execute an
+Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible to execute an
*online* verification of a system, enabling the *reaction* for unexpected
events, avoiding, for example, the propagation of a failure on safety-critical
systems.
--
2.47.1.404.ge66fd72e97
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos
2024-12-09 13:06 [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos Andrew Kreimer
@ 2024-12-11 4:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 15:42 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2024-12-11 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Kreimer
Cc: Jonathan Corbet, linux-trace-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel,
kernel-janitors
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:06:00 +0200
Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
> Fix them.
>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> index dae78dfa7cdc..c700dde9259c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst
> @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ checking* and *theorem proving*) with a more practical approach for complex
> systems.
>
> Instead of relying on a fine-grained model of a system (e.g., a
> -re-implementation a instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
> +re-implementation at instruction level), RV works by analyzing the trace of the
> system's actual execution, comparing it against a formal specification of
> the system behavior.
>
> The main advantage is that RV can give precise information on the runtime
> behavior of the monitored system, without the pitfalls of developing models
> that require a re-implementation of the entire system in a modeling language.
> -Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible execute an
> +Moreover, given an efficient monitoring method, it is possible to execute an
> *online* verification of a system, enabling the *reaction* for unexpected
> events, avoiding, for example, the propagation of a failure on safety-critical
> systems.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos
2024-12-09 13:06 [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos Andrew Kreimer
2024-12-11 4:08 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2024-12-13 15:42 ` Jonathan Corbet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Corbet @ 2024-12-13 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Kreimer, Steven Rostedt
Cc: linux-trace-kernel, linux-doc, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors,
Andrew Kreimer
Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com> writes:
> There are some typos in the documentation: 'a' -> 'at', missing 'to'.
> Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Kreimer <algonell@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/trace/rv/runtime-verification.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-13 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-09 13:06 [PATCH] Documentation/rv: Fix typos Andrew Kreimer
2024-12-11 4:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-13 15:42 ` Jonathan Corbet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).