From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857502B9BF; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736441398; cv=none; b=ls1eLBwEXEmQY5Dx4Kr6yRK5q+ByyrZsu5PTTHUxQFCgQffzIsI2rL8kd9Hf4XE0OVtMAWgvZlzwdCptkAORIwEqrMbhxbwNY3DxE6eujzJHxxu07T3q/FFs5yb/1e5Yx9uruHhehONjAY2T6vW3o/HSGnVEZ9ELRV+G/Nn9zgw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736441398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KYOINm7i9VEnqxTpEy3685WzEKCTpOkGjOhUernrHqs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=C/rq1jCPpoOQMX0KuDWMyjMeVBvidkcfCm2+dmNLCwDPfmq2JMjX+eUmelQIcdZka8AMALUZIaC+Q1ot/CREyFRqYSU3+K8OPyEAc1iVAYEFT2mhogPC5rmvPytWmg+LVPfMSL1CUj1sKN5AguJQkYlU3FmJAGwjDQ/uUGxZ0Qs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=kRLQQavD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="kRLQQavD" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBBE760003; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 16:49:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1736441388; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6lFuNNIQPI4nDahw9mmphg1giwpfblVA/Nb+UIaiTxA=; b=kRLQQavDSK58OBObxcW4mHJkHTGohvYbULw4HSckpVrl6WuZ32h1oIzBsQIz7lyI/P9D5H G/QUQ37/SJ1vagBD72bKEI4C9DfOt5YDgHFGOHRa/c8Zhsvp3cp0w+zmIAtLSKSl2+YZJk k0P8ckTlAme3ZrDYGeaWFioTQmEAHWPOFPjTElnF4ACDEEvGz8iq3A770EoXxtYlhUojkW FfCZVqoNeSPqEvsoR3exyW1NTdsubWrck7ITr0lwUzhJTUiilmLEOwZZfK7OLZoHSh2vmO 8cCg0oXWD7X3sK0vSFQGmMPFUvpv4pVnez5nMlULcWqwtB/jW//T0t1IodUHjA== Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:49:42 +0100 From: Kory Maincent To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson , Dent Project , kernel@pengutronix.de, Maxime Chevallier Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/15] net: pse-pd: Add support for PSE device index Message-ID: <20250109174942.391cbe6a@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: References: <20250109-b4-feature_poe_arrange-v2-0-55ded947b510@bootlin.com> <20250109-b4-feature_poe_arrange-v2-11-55ded947b510@bootlin.com> <20250109075926.52a699de@kernel.org> <20250109170957.1a4bad9c@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: kory.maincent@bootlin.com On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:27:03 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 05:09:57PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 07:59:26 -0800 > > Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > =20 > > > On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 11:18:05 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote: =20 > [...] =20 > > >=20 > > > This index is not used in the series, I see later on you'll add power > > > evaluation strategy but that also seems to be within a domain not > > > device? > > >=20 > > > Doesn't it make sense to move patches 11-14 to the next series? > > > The other 11 patches seem to my untrained eye to reshuffle existing > > > stuff, so they would make sense as a cohesive series.=20 I think I should only drop patch 11 and 12 from this series which add somet= hing new while the rest is reshuffle or fix code. > > Indeed PSE index is used only as user information but there is nothing > > correlated. You are right maybe we can add PSE index when we have somet= hing > > usable for it. =20 >=20 > No user, means, it is not exposed to the user space, it is not about > actual user space users. I may have understood incorrectly but still. Not sure the PSE device index = is interesting for now even in the budget evaluation strategy series. It is related to PSE power domains therefore PSE power domain index solely should= be sufficient. Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com