From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27EB0A2D; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736462215; cv=none; b=p3kIyKLDEq0sRedjuq9OvcLGPauRjziqZRRBPyy/35QrrmleoUoegJSL+r9DWwNfanKyR0M7jrVNwLWxNIwKaMI91ZgNsdGSqLhVPorJVbOV1LRtF6uUWXwWk53QjkWE/NaWivLS0ZaBsRyCpZKRcLe9ZWcpkLU6zga5J2GU1PU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736462215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=V7QjGkH9h1BubB5/P3bw6GihXP391rCP0N48jsGWA+8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XaHzW41fzMWho8fLT49bm0mwOp90MUspffTgpmpRh+GAWVcH0XKN70F+TfQAs563LCKvTO334cYUXJNr++nrkOERqQ3NjnqLeJMjsq9fXzLYx20qSWG00mmidapzEcehPRm4zkr9wa25pleYs+PlcDsjnnLX2sP7LsYW3UG9CtA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=hoKdpzET; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="hoKdpzET" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F643C0003; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 22:36:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1736462210; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=V7QjGkH9h1BubB5/P3bw6GihXP391rCP0N48jsGWA+8=; b=hoKdpzETHRdw3/d1zWOBAosjxMUlHlFXAJXFJjqTrptqt8r9tXoGD3VbMup1GWCC1iJlis /Md2xk58T63juShIFr/OrZKV/1DNXuP2EQs8WkOy+WCI0K0RPjuXZ84CJRnsAkG10PLSLq ZmIMNHZOlhm/JDfXtntNxy79vOYTO7O68qy1k9MLFwBauxKTaC390qCJwYbibUwL7A3h3p C496p3QgIGa7S9s2DKaqQ8codka3/5sTndLWGpu/JmyzcG5ZIEa5s9iflP8WMHcN2dLBGx zUhr59y7ctxFT8b5LbQscyACFfo2z5sihL4CXWfAO0ZT8FdqK4bmfyDY3IYB1A== Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:36:47 +0100 From: Kory Maincent To: Mark Brown Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Oleksij Rempel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , Liam Girdwood , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson , Dent Project , kernel@pengutronix.de, Maxime Chevallier Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/15] net: pse-pd: Add support for PSE device index Message-ID: <20250109233647.7d063fa2@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> In-Reply-To: <94386bd6-18b7-4779-a4eb-98e26c90326b@sirena.org.uk> References: <20250109-b4-feature_poe_arrange-v2-0-55ded947b510@bootlin.com> <20250109-b4-feature_poe_arrange-v2-11-55ded947b510@bootlin.com> <20250109075926.52a699de@kernel.org> <20250109170957.1a4bad9c@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> <20250109174942.391cbe6a@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> <20250109115141.690c87b8@kernel.org> <94386bd6-18b7-4779-a4eb-98e26c90326b@sirena.org.uk> Organization: bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: kory.maincent@bootlin.com On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:59:20 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:51:41AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:49:42 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote: =20 >=20 > > > I think I should only drop patch 11 and 12 from this series which add > > > something new while the rest is reshuffle or fix code. =20 >=20 > > I mentioned 13 & 14 because I suspected we may need to wait for > > the maintainers of regulator, and merge 13 in some special way. > > Looks like Mark merged 13 already, so =F0=9F=A4=B7=EF=B8=8F =20 Yes, Mark is really responsive! Tomorrow I will send a new version without the regulator patch and the PSE device index support. > Well, you were saying that the subdevice structure didn't make sense and > you wanted to see it dropped for now so given that it's -rc6 and it's > unlikely that'll get fixed for this release it made sense to just apply > the regulator bit for now and get myself off these huge threads. >=20 > There's no direct dependency here so it should be fine to merge the > networking stuff separately if that does get sorted out. Thanks Mark for taking the patch! About the following two patches do you prefer to let them in the future bud= get evaluation strategy support net series or should I send them directly in regulator tree? https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-17-dc91a3c= 0c187@bootlin.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-18-dc91a3c= 0c187@bootlin.com/ If I send them in regulator tree do you think it would be doable to have th= em accepted before the merge window. I will resend them with the fixes asked by Krzysztof (convert miniwatt to milliwatt). Regards, --=20 K=C3=B6ry Maincent, Bootlin Embedded Linux and kernel engineering https://bootlin.com