From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
rdunlap@infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/8] netconsole: consolidate send buffers into netconsole_target struct
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:35:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250130103544.GE113107@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250128161128.GB277827@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 04:11:28PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 07:16:40AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Move the static buffers from send_msg_no_fragmentation() and
> > send_msg_fragmented() into the netconsole_target structure. This
> > simplifies the code by:
> > - Eliminating redundant static buffers
> > - Centralizing buffer management in the target structure
> > - Reducing memory usage by 1KB (one buffer instead of two)
> >
> > The buffer in netconsole_target is protected by target_list_lock,
> > maintaining the same synchronization semantics as the original code.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/netconsole.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > index 86ab4a42769a49eebe5dd6f01dafafc6c86ec54f..1a78704681184673f5c1ba8ae665e46751384293 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ struct netconsole_target {
> > bool extended;
> > bool release;
> > struct netpoll np;
> > + /* protected by target_list_lock */
> > + char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK];
>
> nit: buf should also be added to the Kernel doc for this structure.
>
> ...
Hi Breno,
With that fixed feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-24 15:16 [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] netconsole: Add support for CPU population Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/8] netconsole: consolidate send buffers into netconsole_target struct Breno Leitao
2025-01-28 16:11 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-30 10:35 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-01-31 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/8] netconsole: Rename userdata to extradata Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:36 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/8] netconsole: Helper to count number of used entries Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/8] netconsole: Introduce configfs helpers for sysdata features Breno Leitao
2025-01-28 16:12 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-30 10:37 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/8] netconsole: Include sysdata in extradata entry count Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/8] netconsole: add support for sysdata and CPU population Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/8] netconsole: selftest: test for sysdata CPU Breno Leitao
2025-01-30 10:38 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-24 15:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 8/8] netconsole: docs: Add documentation for CPU number auto-population Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-01-27 17:10 ` Breno Leitao
2025-01-24 16:02 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/8] netconsole: Add support for CPU population Andrew Lunn
2025-01-27 9:52 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250130103544.GE113107@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).