From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D3D18FC79 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.50 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739787010; cv=none; b=BNr+aLixEuxLe9HVaM9KA6LU2OWFJt06Tv6l3SPxwbRNtyl89Suyd4E4LenKayj/ZMXJHmCUXYVRBvaAYnolR/9IS46ohsU3zb/njOGhYnI2XYbV0kBZNJ53dAeniNHA/ohSZkqBACXoAWQ4tSZisO6+R4b5e2J7ViQNiadJebg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739787010; c=relaxed/simple; bh=j32aHlewcxZHgt72stBZMlPca6hXMaSDHk5y3S0Dhak=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LIrnS7urACBTcbb7MdS/OuRDIEKO4wg72OKq82im76rdRF1kPQaPq36E9j8vOw89utfViVNi/uEc/0ZAE+mCojnt1AWmxjnLIwgHq5xO/bd69qGsX+muyHmh7ksVgfxh8ktKyc2yKRjxkQnIo10Oq8u3IB9Rjd+xgTe31W2kSbw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=K91MX+8h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="K91MX+8h" Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5ded368fcd9so5188287a12.1 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 02:10:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1739787007; x=1740391807; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Uv151NG0pvPS5npwfEoUptwhovQw5OQ671qB8TdfkUA=; b=K91MX+8h97CtNHY+J6Hcpv3TjveiWPoIsuvYHFjfbsfVFJ96KHJRxALDwc+dNlLKLv jwKBRNkWOSiiA1+TShr2O643K65Uy1hqW725GefzNYyTqIWpic6rb6XyAfXEpJxbAPio rcJiLrasiex4ZjCKyT/JHn2hCFPYcbn/iqecrHTskiukWl/OnAdsirfYbMa04/u0+Rcg UWOF52DAyd30QNH20klAo8T3iN/0jx9dp7qtYVH76rUrWq5WniaJYUQpGGqmDzpd3QyY pG/xTDbNRUR1eqfyRISVVfiTBzfjAVAV+93wdwLJd8WVZT9IEj9t59U3zvBaKUiIDiRg H03w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739787007; x=1740391807; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Uv151NG0pvPS5npwfEoUptwhovQw5OQ671qB8TdfkUA=; b=TmVfQnGsQNiOCOt2m/xL9LQj0O6wQmCpz2SvUCMyjMCsCrQgY3jhH7zSR70GIdK17b 9rRIZtPWKL0hGxyRWp0UKdHbBSOa5KsDTXo7ic9b+MKPjIwFUkeQZNwNmzy+aEuz7PgM ZZsNji3ySnbdJdnp70jLiViqxNjFbnb4tx+9u/Uf8wPJm7USTyOklla4hwnMjGibQFD2 8YjbjvsCGohxSN9gLk+zUhcZyJvuLs1lADw4TWkcrUoR4zc72HeMqyz1b13/VbCnyWbf NowtBWcZHorIYDXgjEo2UZoCixacmMqKwRmqXfNMGqGKp3tAuj6OY5CX5l0fH+DqicYp Sgiw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW3/y6Nq4PPnq3mo8OVYBbbWOWgeKoqVuvZAxVXXxHVgafpq/6r+2zsJnjzZ2/BUnv8Ke9ajdBh0ds=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxj6wtvescnU2Kq9hISuudIh+CR47W+0AUW0+hcJvKv6lmlruOc yn60+rmiPnVyOgSO6WblCcwkk2WQokGv2TQ3z9cpI6V9z0eBVEzWpWYP93N73vk= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct3U+IROdqzlfnFSc135O4cEXLmrT8/rtwPm5XpUW10ZyX1qxAGnEQGxAJXC99 qy25wbbi+lxyg9nC6FhFnBeJthLB9sCXc0NJgedca0MMVhEP5usN7k+6HIo1A3lzJndQzK+lCaq rxxdgzUE44feRE0QbmwwFWCmmj2+cCchuYt70AVT5zMUawQZQlRGQ8Ov3RUu87l77f3T+54ID1a nNREAwCxK3wlLYNqnu+vSxMmKnMSEuvA1LA4a4SaVWpiRCWv9W2H2nRld8E4yp52KstiskjjyPw UCDnn0UhG2N1u675VrAq4C362Tp9g1cVTGyoTgfGFfEwgVJ3F5+36Ui8Wg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGH+62O5WSEtHOlv1+RJOf1VZEfwtFti2ZEDmplBYjZuEVlS2Rl2AjyECic5SaKbQp0V/wtzA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5246:b0:5dc:ad49:ba1a with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5e035f2631bmr10793683a12.0.1739787006494; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 02:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rayden (h-98-128-140-123.A175.priv.bahnhof.se. [98.128.140.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5dece287cebsm6971482a12.74.2025.02.17.02.10.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Feb 2025 02:10:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:10:03 +0100 From: Jens Wiklander To: Amirreza Zarrabi Cc: Sumit Garg , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Bartosz Golaszewski , Srinivas Kandagatla , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF Message-ID: <20250217101003.GB2637163@rayden> References: <20250202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-v2-0-297eacd0d34f@quicinc.com> <20250202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-v2-3-297eacd0d34f@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-v2-3-297eacd0d34f@quicinc.com> On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 06:43:31PM -0800, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote: > For drivers that can transfer data to the TEE without using shared > memory from client, it is necessary to receive the user address > directly, bypassing any processing by the TEE subsystem. Introduce > TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INPUT/OUTPUT/INOUT to represent > userspace buffers. > > Signed-off-by: Amirreza Zarrabi > --- > drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/tee_drv.h | 6 ++++++ > include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > index 721522fe5c63..9f4b9a995e16 100644 > --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c > @@ -386,6 +386,16 @@ static int params_from_user(struct tee_context *ctx, struct tee_param *params, > params[n].u.value.b = ip.b; > params[n].u.value.c = ip.c; > break; > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_OUTPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INOUT: > + params[n].u.ubuf.uaddr = u64_to_user_ptr(ip.a); > + params[n].u.ubuf.size = ip.b; > + > + if (!access_ok(params[n].u.ubuf.uaddr, params[n].u.ubuf.size)) This line is over 80 columns, https://docs.kernel.org/process/coding-style.html#breaking-long-lines-and-strings > + return -EFAULT; > + > + break; > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT: > @@ -454,6 +464,11 @@ static int params_to_user(struct tee_ioctl_param __user *uparams, > put_user(p->u.value.c, &up->c)) > return -EFAULT; > break; > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_OUTPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INOUT: > + if (put_user((u64)p->u.ubuf.size, &up->b)) > + return -EFAULT; > + break; > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT: > if (put_user((u64)p->u.memref.size, &up->b)) > @@ -654,6 +669,13 @@ static int params_to_supp(struct tee_context *ctx, > ip.b = p->u.value.b; > ip.c = p->u.value.c; > break; > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_OUTPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INOUT: > + ip.a = (u64)p->u.ubuf.uaddr; > + ip.b = p->u.ubuf.size; > + ip.c = 0; > + break; > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT: > @@ -756,6 +778,11 @@ static int params_from_supp(struct tee_param *params, size_t num_params, > p->u.value.b = ip.b; > p->u.value.c = ip.c; > break; > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_OUTPUT: > + case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INOUT: > + p->u.ubuf.uaddr = u64_to_user_ptr(ip.a); Is this needed? Compare with how TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_* is handled below. If it's indeed needed, please add an access_ok() check. > + p->u.ubuf.size = ip.b; > + break; > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT: > case TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT: > /* > diff --git a/include/linux/tee_drv.h b/include/linux/tee_drv.h > index d5f0c70ac95c..130782d4d5f6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/tee_drv.h > +++ b/include/linux/tee_drv.h > @@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ struct tee_param_memref { > struct tee_shm *shm; > }; > > +struct tee_param_ubuf { > + void * __user uaddr; > + size_t size; > +}; > + > struct tee_param_value { > u64 a; > u64 b; > @@ -92,6 +97,7 @@ struct tee_param { > u64 attr; > union { > struct tee_param_memref memref; > + struct tee_param_ubuf ubuf; > struct tee_param_value value; > } u; > }; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/tee.h b/include/uapi/linux/tee.h > index d0430bee8292..4a1dcfb4290e 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/tee.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/tee.h > @@ -151,6 +151,13 @@ struct tee_ioctl_buf_data { > #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_OUTPUT 6 > #define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT 7 /* input and output */ > > +/* > + * These defines userspace buffer parameters. > + */ > +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INPUT 8 > +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_OUTPUT 9 > +#define TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_INOUT 10 /* input and output */ > + > /* > * Mask for the type part of the attribute, leaves room for more types > */ > @@ -186,14 +193,17 @@ struct tee_ioctl_buf_data { > /** > * struct tee_ioctl_param - parameter > * @attr: attributes > - * @a: if a memref, offset into the shared memory object, else a value parameter > - * @b: if a memref, size of the buffer, else a value parameter > + * @a: if a memref, offset into the shared memory object, > + * else if a ubuf, address into the user buffer, address _of_ the user buffer? Thanks, Jens > + * else a value parameter > + * @b: if a memref or ubuf, size of the buffer, else a value parameter > * @c: if a memref, shared memory identifier, else a value parameter > * > - * @attr & TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MASK indicates if memref or value is used in > - * the union. TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_* indicates value and > - * TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_* indicates memref. TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE > - * indicates that none of the members are used. > + * @attr & TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MASK indicates if memref, ubuf, or value is > + * used in the union. TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_* indicates value, > + * TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_* indicates memref, and TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF_* > + * indicates ubuf. TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE indicates that none of the members > + * are used. > * > * Shared memory is allocated with TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC which returns an > * identifier representing the shared memory object. A memref can reference > > -- > 2.34.1 >