From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6C85258; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740063688; cv=none; b=QEpK7R3KJx/qtjQji6UBEoYnQBfvQMK7lnVtB00MwJ01TaFmRLp/TuYZifnwUGV/8nw24rDUyYCNeN36CtzFNNFnk80vEek12bZPI9QI1Ju4hC4jb822U4dBNjaja3D59bxYtnnuO1QhZpyL/xcpN/OxbSHOYiThfZK50/Q6aZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740063688; c=relaxed/simple; bh=94ImA64uIlnzboeoRY4vrSCi/VzI+cwRL+UuXNa/SLs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OiywS2Zad0PGrz61Vb2/RVjqlryGAKpMkXQdanlOYphy3ezsMwrLMJxKh9jwYVYhzuBQRfDR+10NBRg9YxZQ9Wu5hREIS0yAmgtYFGf0zeAQqLAAghuiQfkYHNCDeG/6viIKSi1QyWDlWa3GTKShyR0XVv0FFhOaA6RCNQOCIr4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=U2v74DSA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="U2v74DSA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45B14C4CEDD; Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:01:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740063687; bh=94ImA64uIlnzboeoRY4vrSCi/VzI+cwRL+UuXNa/SLs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U2v74DSAVPKxwZWVivMnCo5KSnhBdn4f1U+zitFnUIUD9P0+EZo8oy/wGwXXUn7lm cWHjhgl8GYp31A0AHErNqFCjrdS3Sl7Ybxfaq/qNS4Srp2Vh2MaeoMcB8WgN80z7n0 GQ+k6Wr3N2lnNB6LvYTNyMUujLvTLJMWg8mUx/nmNZcHg4HnYZ/k52oM53umDu1cNV FgoiGzFPd91yzoOAWtpKDyWhhIls+ce5JcEAFDVgpEbaOHGkEvXNS3AzCXKDnGosf6 hX7Swfy+QTJ2JvcakC3DL17XDxNSCtKhZcaLlV9FJX+gUO1IFPvjhVS1VMVfXO5K46 1SD3Tg/pdbDuA== Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:01:23 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Manuel Fombuena Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, corbet@lwn.net, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/5] leds: leds-st1202: fix NULL pointer access on race condition Message-ID: <20250220150123.GD778229@google.com> References: <20250211133149.GN1868108@google.com> <20250213102449.GC2756671@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Manuel Fombuena wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Then you need to separate the set into patches you expect to be > > submitted to the -rcs and ones which can be applied during the next > > cycle, then go to lengths to explain that either in the diff section of > > each patch (preferred) or in the cover-letter. > > One question so I don't take more of your time later on on this. Should I > continue the set with 5 patches as v2, applying the above and the other > comments, or would it be preferable to send this patch with its > cover letter separately and drop it from this set? This and any other patches due for the -rcs need splitting out. Please submit them all again. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]