[v2 1/1] docs: Disambiguate a pair of rST labels

[Jelle van der Waa <jvanderw@redhat.com>]

From: James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net>

According to the reStructuredText documentation, internal hyperlink
targets[1] are intended to resolve within the current document.

Sphinx has a bug that causes internal hyperlinks declared with
duplicate names to resolve nondeterministically, producing incorrect
documentation. Sphinx does not yet emit a warning when these
duplicate target names are declared.

To improve the reproducibility and correctness of the HTML
documentation, disambiguate two labels both previously titled
"submit_improvements".

[1] - https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#hyperlink-targets

Link: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/13383
Signed-off-by: James Addison <jay@jp-hosting.net>

---
V1 -> V2: re-send using different email client
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst     | 4 ++--
 .../admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst        | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst
index 07cfd8863b46..2d1b6f7504c1 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ again.
 
    [:ref:`details<uninstall>`]
 
-.. _submit_improvements:
+.. _submit_trimmed_build_improvements:
 
 Did you run into trouble following any of the above steps that is not cleared up
 by the reference section below? Or do you have ideas how to improve the text?
@@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ complicated, and harder to follow.
 
 That being said: this of course is a balancing act. Hence, if you think an
 additional use-case is worth describing, suggest it to the maintainers of this
-document, as :ref:`described above <submit_improvements>`.
+document, as :ref:`described above <submit_trimmed_build_improvements>`.
 
 
 ..
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
index 03c55151346c..1b246d8a8afb 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/verify-bugs-and-bisect-regressions.rst
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ culprit might be known already. For further details on what actually qualifies
 as a regression check out Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst.
 
 If you run into any problems while following this guide or have ideas how to
-improve it, :ref:`please let the kernel developers know <submit_improvements>`.
+improve it, :ref:`please let the kernel developers know <submit_regression_tracing_improvements>`.
 
 .. _introprep_bissbs:
 
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ follow these instructions.
 
 [:ref:`details <introoptional_bisref>`]
 
-.. _submit_improvements:
+.. _submit_regression_tracing_improvements:
 
 Conclusion
 ----------
-- 
2.48.1