From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571261B6CE5; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744123850; cv=none; b=Xfm3AgpghcPGAW8x3X86IvNRrH+joONuFMR+87e7cHnwo/Dsw/MoP1ZHbeDcjnXVE/lCC1CuWYzsacxT6pcwwF3UaTuaFqSbMKg+Vr1y5n4A2s4Jmms5fJzLUpe7qrlpx8gg4fSdzfyG7gUv2LRBIA+AOx4t0slnwSP3qSPZKJA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744123850; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iippsYe8qLb/2X9/I9NX6d/fzC9lDY7Hh/+44sczz4g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GOTPjnP0bdLaMceaM9YEhfPBd6btnj+0ZSqlxy/rwfMXjvlrjyy6/VKqFsbJGnF7xI68s3cS+6sJ7DfCn/yb01JVIErdq58W3goerRPmeM/77TbjVGhwwXV5cZv/6wzwgxu+JirMn9fZnTubZI/DTO4C2iQMeDxV9XdNVAGMuRw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NSMi+sI6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NSMi+sI6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2297AC4CEE5; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 14:50:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744123849; bh=iippsYe8qLb/2X9/I9NX6d/fzC9lDY7Hh/+44sczz4g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NSMi+sI6BfxNdjGVuI7k1YPEEB3cI1ZteuMz/i77RX6ZKVVtc7G5wTT1aSxozuebA XMflo8Dg43jH0NMQTNts8wq5qxJk/KX2JwIt/jhxJDVCZ4nfBlEdutImR4Y8TcCGYr a/LZp8xVwK5rZ8s5TpytyreXMUjrkSIDT3dfjZA+mKTMjzNxb00w63F9LCi2sDaXhM TIDpgJYw9Skn+WXlBrEQ6c6lH13pqYKgkqZjUgH+ju6TbeV8JhlZv2pzeLBH9H8w9a hApED5WPIbOVRA8ssP34+b8l6uizHChdo0YvbYvAoSbbprKSYOk6daNln8naVIVuOY ngrqmh3HwUXXQ== Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:50:47 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Sean Anderson Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, upstream@airoha.com, Christian Marangi , Heiner Kallweit , Kory Maincent , Alexandre Belloni , Alexandre Torgue , Clark Wang , Claudiu Beznea , Claudiu Manoil , Conor Dooley , Ioana Ciornei , Jonathan Corbet , Joyce Ooi , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Madalin Bucur , Maxime Coquelin , Michal Simek , Nicolas Ferre , Radhey Shyam Pandey , Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Robert Hancock , Saravana Kannan , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean , Wei Fang , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 00/14] Add PCS core support Message-ID: <20250408075047.69d031a9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250407231746.2316518-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> References: <20250407231746.2316518-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:17:31 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote: > This series depends on [1,2], and they have been included at the > beginning so CI will run. However, I expect them to be reviewed/applied > outside the net-next tree. These appear to break the build: drivers/acpi/property.c:1669:39: error: initialization of =E2=80=98int (*)(= const struct fwnode_handle *, const char *, const char *, int, unsigned in= t, struct fwnode_reference_args *)=E2=80=99 from incompatible pointer type= =E2=80=98int (*)(const struct fwnode_handle *, const char *, const char *,= unsigned int, unsigned int, struct fwnode_reference_args *)=E2=80=99 [-W= incompatible-pointer-types] 1669 | .get_reference_args =3D acpi_fwnode_get_reference_a= rgs, \ Could you post as RFC until we can actually merge this? I'm worried=20 some sleep deprived maintainer may miss the note in the cover letter and just apply it all to net-next.. --=20 pw-bot: cr