From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Cc: "Anusha Srivatsa" <asrivats@redhat.com>,
"Paul Kocialkowski" <paulk@sys-base.io>,
"Dmitry Baryshkov" <lumag@kernel.org>,
"Hervé Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Hui Pu" <Hui.Pu@gehealthcare.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/bridge: documentat bridge allocation and lifecycle
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 16:50:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409-drm-bridge-alloc-doc-test-v7-1-a3ca4b97597f@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409-drm-bridge-alloc-doc-test-v7-0-a3ca4b97597f@bootlin.com>
Document in detail the DRM bridge allocation and refcounting process based
on the recently introduced devm_drm_bridge_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
---
Changes in v7:
- remove mention of "legacy mode", we now support only refcounted
bridges
- rename patch title from "drm/bridge: add documentation of refcounted
bridges", we now support only refcounted bridges
Changes in v6:
- update to the new devm_drm_bridge_alloc() API
- rewrite and improve various sentences for clarity
- fix typos (Randy Dunlap)
This patch was added in v5.
---
Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst | 6 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
index 5139705089f200b189876a5a61bf2a935cec433a..393cd0e4cb5af3fe98674e7a96c853ffb2556c97 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
@@ -151,6 +151,12 @@ Overview
.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
:doc: overview
+Bridge allocation and lifecycle
+-------------------------------
+
+.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+ :doc: bridge lifecycle
+
Display Driver Integration
--------------------------
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
index b4c89ec01998b849018ce031c7cd84614e65e710..b7e1ad761dad52bdb2ec09d425e69ee23a18fd36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
@@ -61,6 +61,79 @@
* encoder chain.
*/
+/**
+ * DOC: bridge lifecycle
+ *
+ * In some use cases such as hot-plugging a DRM bridge device can
+ * physically disappear and reappear at runtime. To handle such cases
+ * without destroying and recreating the entire DRM pipeline, DRM bridge
+ * lifetime is managed using reference counting:
+ *
+ * - each &struct drm_bridge is reference counted since its allocation
+ * - any code taking a pointer to a bridge has APIs to get a reference and
+ * put it when done, to ensure the memory allocated for the bridge won't
+ * be deallocated while there is still a reference to it
+ * - the driver implementing the bridge also holds a reference, but the
+ * allocated struct can survive the driver in case other references still
+ * exist
+ * - deallocation is done when the last put happens, dropping the refcount
+ * to zero
+ *
+ * Usage of refcounted bridges happens in two sides: the bridge *provider*
+ * and the bridge *consumers*. The bridge provider is the driver
+ * implementing the bridge. The bridge consumers are all parts of the
+ * kernel taking a &struct drm_bridge pointer, including other bridges,
+ * encoders and the DRM core.
+ *
+ * For bridge **providers**, the bridge driver declares a driver-specific
+ * struct embedding a &struct drm_bridge. E.g.::
+ *
+ * struct my_bridge {
+ * ...
+ * struct drm_bridge bridge;
+ * ...
+ * };
+ *
+ * The driver must allocate and initialize ``struct my_bridge`` using
+ * devm_drm_bridge_alloc(), as in this example::
+ *
+ * static int my_bridge_probe(...)
+ * {
+ * struct device *dev = ...;
+ * struct my_bridge *mybr;
+ *
+ * mybr = devm_drm_bridge_alloc(dev, struct my_bridge, bridge, &my_bridge_funcs);
+ * if (IS_ERR(mybr))
+ * return PTR_ERR(mybr);
+ *
+ * // Get resources, initialize my_bridge members...
+ * drm_bridge_add(&mybr->bridge);
+ * ...
+ * }
+ *
+ * static void my_bridge_remove(...)
+ * {
+ * struct my_bridge *mybr = ...;
+ *
+ * drm_bridge_remove(&mybr->bridge);
+ * // Free resources
+ * // ... NO kfree here!
+ * }
+ *
+ * Bridge **consumers** need to handle the case of a bridge being removed
+ * while they have a pointer to it. As this can happen at any time, such
+ * code can incur in use-after-free. To avoid that, consumers have to call
+ * drm_bridge_get() when taking a pointer and drm_bridge_put() after they
+ * are done using it. This will extend the allocation lifetime of the
+ * bridge struct until the last reference has been put, potentially a long
+ * time after the bridge device has been removed from the kernel.
+ *
+ * Functions that return a pointer to a bridge, such as
+ * of_drm_find_bridge(), internally call drm_bridge_get() on the bridge
+ * they are about to return, so users using such functions to get a bridge
+ * pointer only have to take care of calling drm_bridge_put().
+ */
+
/**
* DOC: display driver integration
*
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 14:50 [PATCH v7 0/2] drm/bridge: add docs and kunit test for devm_drm_bridge_alloc() Luca Ceresoli
2025-04-09 14:50 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2025-04-14 15:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] drm/bridge: documentat bridge allocation and lifecycle Maxime Ripard
2025-04-15 11:22 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-04-09 14:50 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/tests: bridge: add a KUnit test for devm_drm_bridge_alloc() Luca Ceresoli
2025-04-14 15:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-04-15 11:22 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-05-15 8:11 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-05-16 15:38 ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-05-22 15:53 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409-drm-bridge-alloc-doc-test-v7-1-a3ca4b97597f@bootlin.com \
--to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=Hui.Pu@gehealthcare.com \
--cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=asrivats@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=paulk@sys-base.io \
--cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).