From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CECC62E11CF; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 01:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749864688; cv=none; b=MoTjOqfwEyzo4YJDH/UuNC3xf15RJGwtwWlajqoBXa2owr34idu1eQGQV/mxAMJJ4qN/ktv9otVErNwK3KO2fOodXk6PoNuJtap5Ipe9Jcb4U43wHgnRc9dpbDN6y/GL0SQfSXMyHCB9okeFexgRNIVc7mPsryrpVZLo5q62ReY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749864688; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D0at5//Awrh06HYuevfzb4zRyl2X0q3tzcu+Lc0TD4A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=mpXWoMP3xV15n76sx2+baFVBWY1jfQ2ZBFpUOS8TIR1wEd7NayKCgy1omAOdfcaGSW+yMfWXugqvC7tZjYJhTyTOYDB2acrRmUUEPUEsQ4DnE0JZ6mb8HVuAb9rt/ikAGoskXVbIFrjXSYzXw6M5Uh51ZOWpygADlKjjoDg8fHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=o4wUnS8G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="o4wUnS8G" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43A24C4CEE3; Sat, 14 Jun 2025 01:31:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1749864687; bh=D0at5//Awrh06HYuevfzb4zRyl2X0q3tzcu+Lc0TD4A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o4wUnS8G3zUU2+8wmH8J2wfk9no5dUui43QE5ExzG8iXlMm/IzTo2mDiafSjMZdGQ H4tQW9iWokIuNVc0GXuM7a1xQJhjBHdtrSgPzMBIwVd/IXmpmh22CTyLtFlnenfWm8 v/NBXMA96kTlcx8s4UPLo3a2QnP0F7IEMn374JIE= Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:31:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Kuan-Wei Chiu Cc: Robert Pang , corbet@lwn.net, colyli@kernel.org, kent.overstreet@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Fix bcache regression with equality-aware heap APIs Message-Id: <20250613183126.9bd25d84b912f18c249bb010@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250610215516.1513296-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> <20250611184817.bf9fee25d6947a9bcf60b6f9@linux-foundation.org> <20250613110415.b898c62c7c09ff6e8b0149e9@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 07:19:51 +0800 Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote: > Sure, I'll prepare a revert patch to address the issue and plan to > submit it for backporting to -stable. > > However, I'd like to confirm whether the following patch series > structure would be appropriate: > > - Patch 1: Revert 866898efbb25 and CC it to stable > - Patch 2–8: Introduce the new equality-aware heap API > - Patch 9: Revert Patch 1 and switch bcache to use the new API > > In this case, we would only backport Patch 1 to stable. > > Alternatively, would you prefer we simply revert 866898efbb25 without > introducing and using the new API in the same series? Yes, just the revert for now, please. Let's not make that dependent on new development.