From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B14420D4FF; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750199407; cv=none; b=mAfE2H8dO8EZgkCZCZdGE83lnmghxB8252Yid4VIo4c5KeKP7DyAkPqx6vFhET/Ysc1O23JBb4I9iI+U7fTpDAitJvly3fQKRkvP+IfKxhdLG1Qt1vALJ8gXKPNm5XJ817eTrRN8fWQDkxMJ4fzEbwQRollXI9PztLt6/kOihgw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750199407; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SGGyiCoTGoTxw00KV1kNaqflYtCwj4p1ZTrArbPnXIg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=S+xqcn834W0501ZV4J0Qk70Eghx0F/jybGsEhs3roKdtuwaIT51x9KpmDs14r/pe8r13+gD2FuPSJZYFwTya7FLMNLmXDN+1V2HNOXRUPh7hBjs7CQcSr90pYbGkBwWv4SLnpJtEmxcG3HsHPfvLEU+BSqeMkX5IEkDwFpB9jg4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=HF8NQaqd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HF8NQaqd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFDD7C4CEE3; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:30:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750199407; bh=SGGyiCoTGoTxw00KV1kNaqflYtCwj4p1ZTrArbPnXIg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HF8NQaqdgVNbeHkHl3F1yA+9mKX3t6FafblUPQ6vixdZRiOBXLamWK1sgcmtAQWdP wcdIlJekyyZibdEs78WcHv4n/5GYwJrI54JPxp67dy48ssMlHjdpOFVcprQUsXBCY8 AubqlKue0z0/rGlkLM0zsXdZCB68odDs1AaWTNtod2ppAW+UbHR3Llhz7oHQIocz2D 0cRTGWiXnm+mwRJi1nJ5eqIG+lT047LaTVf+ZlOrD4032jf+KCfxgIuWdNz99tck4r 2SYBG4JBnGoNY2F93E8Ax9MLSW3cf+mpa0+NZFMP0rWrRgZZZn8V6a9GHnV6tj9MKy IcgF9wKcy3rOQ== From: SeongJae Park To: Bijan Tabatabai Cc: SeongJae Park , Gregory Price , David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, ziy@nvidia.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com, rakie.kim@sk.com, byungchul@sk.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com, bijantabatab@micron.com, venkataravis@micron.com, emirakhur@micron.com, ajayjoshi@micron.com, vtavarespetr@micron.com, damon@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Expose policy_nodemask() in include/linux/mempolicy.h Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 15:30:05 -0700 Message-Id: <20250617223005.2526-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:54:39 -0500 Bijan Tabatabai wrote: [...] > Given this discussion, as well as Joshua's comments earlier [1], it > sounds like while people aren't exactly opposed to using mempolicy for > this, the building consensus is that it would be best not to. I will > move the interleave logic to DAMON for the next revision. However, I > still think it makes sense to use the global weights (probably via > get_il_weight) for now to avoid allocating pages a certain way and > then migrating them soon after. Makes sense to me :) > > I'll try to send the next version of the patch set by the end of the week. Looking forwrd to it! Thanks, SJ [...]