From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD2B30E833; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750371773; cv=none; b=K4FW8wT9ZYPLC2w+0W1pG5HEH9Co2v359MEDatrjsj7YHvB5jszD+hMBLKeYW8JzjR2XK8Hxkp6K7Tc676XoGhIgszK88hAB9dIH2/6TAWzd1YrcU2bW40hS9adiyMmIHF01ykuoqSClNvdDJPH+34lW9ym33w5pxdd1fHWnJ/o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750371773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uuNeXpgmEWXpmKFqM5fGOcTUU83w5G+xQhwv58hyrIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FT+xtNBvofMxMTerRvkbB++SBfxTJ1ib80ZbplSAwZnfAae7wi6htYuBox6BQAqnNksx4zqpSHJLPCPzlWpjpQSu4OpflNof+reMRw4ps+rCxQ5JBy79DjCGDlFrRom4bVfuPF9fIVZtB5oX3pGD+MJniH2qhKs5Ns4gbMiw/WQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SwbEl1Rg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SwbEl1Rg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1510EC4CEEA; Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:22:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750371772; bh=uuNeXpgmEWXpmKFqM5fGOcTUU83w5G+xQhwv58hyrIs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SwbEl1Rg+yOe+lOwKpPUYYcTnGZpOdKAeO5wLLkfbfzgx/LdXdH41OMCKRQwqhFhT bUxv7wDb28iStyvWAgR1FOUM5irshO3X68EAhZ7VVxwLY76+uyNzqg6gsyTYzuJy4O L+BZPLqAGzPgJgg2WZ+n4E1qOLRqZyWSsKJujNzg38JabZHtbVU1ZZ2Xs2EqxP0g/T 5jdORCr71TLpJs9KGg16PcdnDO32VRJ9mF9iFO+JYKiy1f6iHJ3O0zVeQPw5Usulh/ mKU8qH49+v8zV6eQeQpeAT50Pv3tF4TAM0a/q0mqgwAzLaSW9U1cO6l3Hr2j/oYoIs hvq4qJw7kasfA== Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 15:22:51 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Saeed Mahameed Cc: Mark Bloch , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Eric Dumazet , Andrew Lunn , Simon Horman , saeedm@nvidia.com, gal@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, Leon Romanovsky , Jonathan Corbet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/mlx5e: Add support for PCIe congestion events Message-ID: <20250619152251.5005d727@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250619113721.60201-1-mbloch@nvidia.com> <20250619075543.1d31f937@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:19:20 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote: > I think what Mark did here is fine, Yes I understand this is not > applicable to net-next yet, Yes, once again netdev is the problem. > but the point is review and we can do the following, when review is done: > > I can Apply the mlx5-next portion to mlx5-next and Mark on V2 can send the > net-next stuff + A PR request to the mlx5-next branch, this is how we used > to do it all the time, but this time review happens all at once for both > trees. > > Jakub is this acceptable ? Don't complicate it, please. Send a PR with the interface patches and we can review the rest.