From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7EF27D786; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751399136; cv=none; b=Bazc5hzKNVG9i/TcloADfQev2zoeK/Fgg9rhlM/+F0BlPQmnokMrsdWiCBGTeUrHHrQWUWt2iJxmcV1s719SCBBQVvxCcFpwx4n8hDiDuavMzLe/r+F37oofraV+N5JYWMzmLQBwRpfCioNxxog8GYIMPlvy3BODcYegfEpeoQ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751399136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hS9q/vvxKhbfDyH23VL0mZ2urZFYa3ZD/pd84T65R6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OPMbV7+MLCIGhChJwyFZHh0rXLAoOpUwNgRw+R1LKlKkeS+b2AUUYDzfyFa1c2bgUlspY7Snsr1v+mqmCNALWdLpc8Gl664q1XFx7EE3mDGBhz9dMCzVCAPaxI6i8wKW5TF3sOImzjSeI9qp2b89xOdzsb5puMcF9hEkm/OStgk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=factv7t8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="factv7t8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AC3EC4CEEB; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:45:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751399136; bh=hS9q/vvxKhbfDyH23VL0mZ2urZFYa3ZD/pd84T65R6g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=factv7t8ri+w+XVvUMpsVszs+crSDos/CJtMRdQ/rh45/ajvuayFBFk18PB/qdgCN CLpuDzPSfLcE6sS0bI+0id5cjglJjLxO/8NUnGZyOWsG6YVItRqKN62DALt/W4HAsy 62I2dVjbWv5h1z6l1T+K/IPBYwIZ4i/OB52zKRPz1somXdXQxYVO+rLv4vLRAbEY// eO7JMM//cLG+qzZd7XGemmAtzScGIUqZDlN0R2g2r4yXWAGybt6ugT9ipPHjPuvxWw bkX+B5vPXkNjOFJGHJYTCnujNrhTjuvDczW6VL3lgmRLCfuMW6kORTpJiCX5y/YPhV J1OM4DDfq4dzw== Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 12:45:35 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation , Linux ext4 , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4 docs toctree reorganization Message-ID: <20250701194535.GI9987@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250620105643.25141-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> <87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:11:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Bagas Sanjaya writes: > > > Hi Jon, hi Ted, > > > > While discussing on my previous ext4 docs reorganization attempt > > by merging contents [1], Jon suggested that considering current docs > > file structure, a proper toctree would be ideal [2]. So, here's > > the patchset that does exactly that. > > > > Actual conversion to toctree structure is in [1/5], while the rest > > is cleanups to make the resulting toctree nicer. > > > > This patchset is based on docs-next tree. > > So to me this seems like an improvement. I'm happy to take it, though > would prefer an ack from ext4land if possible. I did, yesterday: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net/T/#mc3ea7f04fc1b0e4294bce6bd60f5f605017f6f7c Though I'm also happy not to be thought of as part of 'ext4land' ;) --D > Thanks, > > jon >