From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
gfs2@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] iomap: add read_folio_range() handler for buffered writes
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 15:51:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250708135132.3347932-14-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708135132.3347932-1-hch@lst.de>
Add a read_folio_range() handler for buffered writes that filesystems
may pass in if they wish to provide a custom handler for synchronously
reading in the contents of a folio.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
[hch: renamed to read_folio_range, pass less arguments]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst | 6 ++++++
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 13 +++++++++----
include/linux/iomap.h | 10 ++++++++++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst
index a9b48ce4af92..067ed8e14ef3 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/iomap/operations.rst
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ The following address space operations can be wrapped easily:
void (*put_folio)(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, unsigned copied,
struct folio *folio);
bool (*iomap_valid)(struct inode *inode, const struct iomap *iomap);
+ int (*read_folio_range)(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
+ struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, size_t len);
};
iomap calls these functions:
@@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ iomap calls these functions:
``->iomap_valid``, then the iomap should considered stale and the
validation failed.
+ - ``read_folio_range``: Called to synchronously read in the range that will
+ be written to. If this function is not provided, iomap will default to
+ submitting a bio read request.
+
These ``struct kiocb`` flags are significant for buffered I/O with iomap:
* ``IOCB_NOWAIT``: Turns on ``IOMAP_NOWAIT``.
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index c73048062cb1..b885267828d8 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -670,7 +670,8 @@ static int iomap_read_folio_range(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
return submit_bio_wait(&bio);
}
-static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len,
+static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
+ const struct iomap_write_ops *write_ops, size_t len,
struct folio *folio)
{
struct iomap_folio_state *ifs;
@@ -721,8 +722,12 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, size_t len,
if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
return -EAGAIN;
- status = iomap_read_folio_range(iter, folio,
- block_start, plen);
+ if (write_ops && write_ops->read_folio_range)
+ status = write_ops->read_folio_range(iter,
+ folio, block_start, plen);
+ else
+ status = iomap_read_folio_range(iter,
+ folio, block_start, plen);
if (status)
return status;
}
@@ -838,7 +843,7 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter,
else if (srcmap->flags & IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD)
status = __block_write_begin_int(folio, pos, len, NULL, srcmap);
else
- status = __iomap_write_begin(iter, len, folio);
+ status = __iomap_write_begin(iter, write_ops, len, folio);
if (unlikely(status))
goto out_unlock;
diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
index 80f543cc4fe8..73dceabc21c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/iomap.h
+++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
@@ -166,6 +166,16 @@ struct iomap_write_ops {
* locked by the iomap code.
*/
bool (*iomap_valid)(struct inode *inode, const struct iomap *iomap);
+
+ /*
+ * Optional if the filesystem wishes to provide a custom handler for
+ * reading in the contents of a folio, otherwise iomap will default to
+ * submitting a bio read request.
+ *
+ * The read must be done synchronously.
+ */
+ int (*read_folio_range)(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
+ struct folio *folio, loff_t pos, size_t len);
};
/*
--
2.47.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-08 13:51 refactor the iomap writeback code v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 01/14] iomap: header diet Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 19:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-08 21:09 ` Joanne Koong
2025-07-09 9:09 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-09 17:53 ` Joanne Koong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 02/14] iomap: pass more arguments using the iomap writeback context Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 19:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 03/14] iomap: cleanup the pending writeback tracking in iomap_writepage_map_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 04/14] iomap: refactor the writeback interface Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 19:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 05/14] iomap: hide ioends from the generic writeback code Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 19:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 06/14] iomap: add public helpers for uptodate state manipulation Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 07/14] iomap: move all ioend handling to ioend.c Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 08/14] iomap: rename iomap_writepage_map to iomap_writeback_folio Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 21:12 ` Joanne Koong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 09/14] iomap: move folio_unlock out of iomap_writeback_folio Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 10/14] iomap: export iomap_writeback_folio Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] iomap: replace iomap_folio_ops with iomap_write_ops Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] iomap: improve argument passing to iomap_read_folio_sync Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 19:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-08 21:23 ` Joanne Koong
2025-07-08 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-07-08 13:51 ` [PATCH 14/14] iomap: build the writeback code without CONFIG_BLOCK Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 21:27 ` Joanne Koong
2025-07-08 21:30 ` refactor the iomap writeback code v4 Joanne Koong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-10 13:33 refactor the iomap writeback code v5 Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-10 13:33 ` [PATCH 13/14] iomap: add read_folio_range() handler for buffered writes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250708135132.3347932-14-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=gfs2@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).