From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f180.google.com (mail-pl1-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E570B18A6CF for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753451403; cv=none; b=gm55qjlt+PdyIqNDOWNZmd3bhh5/aCRSpaV1zKv7Gl6e+Iwq8OI5k5T1elwKqsT64d2FsBZImMuCnvV71+usbPalcNX9IRkXugW/UNe0hN30/aYsjDZ0eMPZ/ZdusU3yjYFY5Me3pYvPS2vjHm0dd8C81VGmzoniKP4olayatYQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753451403; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Sr50NcJXDS17kme4FzpL0Cqb3DQXZa/KOF9yp/4S9tM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=SApfuo6QxljXNGv1nHNlgP+kcNoY4kalEGAhjWbhQO5PyOLsuOJtveWyj5528BfwgjdgCm8kA0bznmOJPG86BGhtUH3i/GVWBQzK9tQ1UCKdJ1t6McjVAXBDQnvTwkgoK/62gs7ag1WyPp1d1BQhFtQMoKHpDhKKilxdByhT1Rg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=He2M7vyU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="He2M7vyU" Received: by mail-pl1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2352b04c7c1so765225ad.3 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 06:50:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1753451401; x=1754056201; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YXMpnjUdG4Kw9ubj5TtD46UoMTtWbLtFnmHMligTI9c=; b=He2M7vyUJ+PdPk5IIOTXn+lt12JBu4RqjZXcbyrtHDps1BX1MVRtlxe6ysMWALnrEz WZhrg0D3/oeUDCuemJA3t9CMoguuMJ/tZDFmg158vNRymr2G2Cko1Q1KIRArUcqM2kLn BtfVq6mQbsLnSx+NE70hhffhbphlLO0r7f/47hoizkJfqET+enPcEjc2EUKs8psMz0fj xNZ9Xi8Na9MQ1V1zU/0crkx1W/v408OhxAsw69NmvJQIXsS+GWJFjwsCY58uWLTHWIVr 6xV2NVa8+YSmdAvQSXGjaD/QYIdMTzpv00XEUJLpZbADteV99vfISMrZA2lv9CZShJd/ co6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753451401; x=1754056201; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YXMpnjUdG4Kw9ubj5TtD46UoMTtWbLtFnmHMligTI9c=; b=hj0cjtHppb4wOeEi+rHJ7abJFg4lxOSYs3vdyclCMylx9zx/vRxGnnE7oNH59li5ID 9sGBLgOGQ4ekgrrHevFo5QzZa6G+F23NQcN55/POK/c3vMOJGTzwLbsQJ8zXmZhqDS7N U0nuJPR0PfaNa8E0L+Bd0EWiAvokEooI/HGINTgn88agrHk45X1Aq2CTRFL5FMoRnAvc vWc42BuC5QGF4IJ8MAlEIm1jqvT+aIOEOHJVgNaAzxnSPNgPi7yhmCdDmUnyXQGUwQqO /bXtR0VikPQImfX54X6Kr+RLnab3DOLDnpmDgZ/5qHqqovctIcD2tJ30wxtFnaU2WaUb I9dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJFCJTrW78ae/doFtvgX67JGr2hxV2SA/a4qd9fLIjX7jLMD2i +njlPdbzw88mR3P3g0KXLGdiXaagenbBbCwi5BRsebpoEVP8ZvD6VbmX X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsf6+3meAfpoe5L0oEY52geGhvanF4Fp58NoAhVkW1rPEIcuEe1ueAopTiNFIj N/K9VpFY9Z4EooF5wnZZKnna/6su1LgQR7N4IlZLSrdnlOyWIgwb+z+1vzcBwPFgJpwqQfVaR/L kwW7vubudzFkaclPPpB5KPv3uzyuN6PwAyBPmkO57SCLgOzSFGJBDjBQYdz0lRBKSpODndgXnkb cY9kDaz0EW9VQAJVOwnch9k3bQdedEqdqzZv4B4dzgkTPLJ++UcIl1goyH8qsB5uREnvPqB/8op 7fOXagozetVKARgjMsG7q+mfg3pocCUW9EBY6/SDucsjCGCzgAIGVLo4MCjlX43oAA6ebqEcnpe ZJdsMdvXzMOIHtI8s9UHrFkjQOU9zXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHe2wHoEDWeA2K0xii926CeSkBkqXuzndVLC83/VUS0MCi7b2T+8npnEF5p/dhu6WZbMIisrg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:185:b0:23f:8bcc:e4fd with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-23fb3178ea6mr13927535ad.10.1753451400989; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ranganath.. ([2406:7400:98:d071:5938:d7e3:9db4:a3eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-23fa48bc8c0sm37785085ad.100.2025.07.25.06.49.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Jul 2025 06:50:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Ranganath V N To: corbet@lwn.net Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Ranganath V N Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix minor typos Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 19:19:40 +0530 Message-ID: <20250725134940.12106-1-vnranganath.20@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Corrected a few spelling errors and improved the phrasing Signed-off-by: Ranganath V N --- Documentation/arch/loongarch/irq-chip-model.rst | 4 ++-- Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/loongarch/irq-chip-model.rst b/Documentation/arch/loongarch/irq-chip-model.rst index a7ecce11e445..8f5c3345109e 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/loongarch/irq-chip-model.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/loongarch/irq-chip-model.rst @@ -139,13 +139,13 @@ Feature EXTIOI_HAS_INT_ENCODE is part of standard EIOINTC. If it is 1, it indicates that CPU Interrupt Pin selection can be normal method rather than bitmap method, so interrupt can be routed to IP0 - IP15. -Feature EXTIOI_HAS_CPU_ENCODE is entension of V-EIOINTC. If it is 1, it +Feature EXTIOI_HAS_CPU_ENCODE is extension of V-EIOINTC. If it is 1, it indicates that CPU selection can be normal method rather than bitmap method, so interrupt can be routed to CPU0 - CPU255. EXTIOI_VIRT_CONFIG ------------------ -This register is read-write register, for compatibility intterupt routed uses +This register is read-write register, for compatibility interrupt routed uses the default method which is the same with standard EIOINTC. If the bit is set with 1, it indicated HW to use normal method rather than bitmap method. diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst index dd8b7806944e..3d61b9d06f7b 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The list of feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo is not complete and represents an ill-fated attempt from long time ago to put feature flags in an easy to find place for userspace. -However, the amount of feature flags is growing by the CPU generation, +However, the number of feature flags is growing with the CPU generation, leading to unparseable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo. What is more, those feature flags do not even need to be in that file -- 2.43.0