From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85EC52DAFA0; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753886622; cv=none; b=izVprblrixs8QZKjC5uLnR8yZw2EtAclUJ3dBSHP617HCM0Ea1Laonp98yuSz0SLqO9shcwE4z8OYEBZa32OXhe/7TMJRMjG5asWaigZmls50akVtGkgAjxuF85da3lvVSe1soei0QKRlGnTRwflqAhGMf4Aly5xCC9Rc4Tn4S0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753886622; c=relaxed/simple; bh=idRnj5P4PrYGxexiNDf1IWPLr0mVthPDzs6oUfOLhrM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AD7h4YtW5OklnXleX/HOMIuzvP+gzvDl3VqfGEelF6cVskaGzXYiG+ki48cnyO+MqWUmUgUI2Atl6QN4BPD/OpcZdAbXWO04eIPNovJZpEphO9F58pRTsHP/aRW3jmGy0ph9QAiTAHd3TuRgxJ8vIx8D3KnRJM11jN3vul53nck= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Bz2oH02/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Bz2oH02/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1753886621; x=1785422621; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=idRnj5P4PrYGxexiNDf1IWPLr0mVthPDzs6oUfOLhrM=; b=Bz2oH02/Z58mRocLaBzsJfjnRHGs7UiK3Lvfxuh1uZ5cfGpoJpEYshoX y2A2HGum6UCiwkJch6i88gAraOMQybQJ4ORJZKp4OxR1hEryBet0pGIZU dAik0eRhLAetr+Ime8fnvEtn8Xl6tJS/dY6s8xvcUs1oDhIuk+Y1/VvU1 jn6S3riB2Kc+h/ph/WxzwbiVRAmQvSfs8p5Z+0Tt7K/S4lEgHJ6IkAlnb rnXOkvB2lBXDaBD1ZGnSpYQesiOrHnW7oNJQLNqRLjdvs6GYAPXCTSwyd CkoPzXDmuKEkRySt9zMBU/I8AJmgHqKq8J3hstElDTvlfoxE6gX/CZrP4 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Eqmfr9EHRpeo5RVIoNAkDw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: I29DRyAGQAOsLA4NGX/xHQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11507"; a="55890914" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="55890914" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Jul 2025 07:43:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: oTzVPsG9QR+19wHO6VXhaA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8uYbk/j7SeWAaepWravi+g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,350,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="193987297" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 160750d4a34c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2025 07:43:34 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 160750d4a34c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uh81k-0002qG-0g; Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:43:32 +0000 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:43:04 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Le Goffic , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Philipp Zabel , Jonathan Corbet , Gatien Chevallier , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Gabriel Fernandez , Le Goffic , Julius Werner Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment?= Le Goffic Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver Message-ID: <202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396@foss.st.com> Hi Clément, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Cl-ment-Le-Goffic/bus-firewall-move-stm32_firewall-header-file-in-include-folder/20250728-234144 base: 89be9a83ccf1f88522317ce02f854f30d6115c41 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250728-ddrperfm-upstream-v5-13-03f1be8ad396%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver config: s390-randconfig-001-20250730 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250730/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202507302237.gyVCBmXs-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:213:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 213 | writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:220:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 220 | writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:227:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 227 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:234:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 234 | writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg); | ^ >> drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:240:15: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 240 | u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:255:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 255 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:258:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 258 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:264:12: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 264 | u32 val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:267:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 267 | writel_relaxed(val, pmu->membase + r->enable.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:285:17: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 285 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:288:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 288 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + r->cfg.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:302:16: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 302 | cnt_sel_val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:306:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 306 | writel_relaxed(cnt_sel_val, pmu->membase + cnt_sel_evt_reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:428:9: error: call to undeclared function 'readl_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 428 | val = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->counter_evt[counter->idx].reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:778:3: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 778 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg); | ^ drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c:803:2: error: call to undeclared function 'writel_relaxed'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 803 | writel_relaxed(pmu->dram_type, pmu->membase + pmu->cfg->regs->dram_inf.reg); | ^ 16 errors generated. vim +/writel_relaxed +213 drivers/perf/stm32_ddr_pmu.c 208 209 static void stm32_ddr_start_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 210 { 211 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 212 > 213 writel_relaxed(r->start.mask, pmu->membase + r->start.reg); 214 } 215 216 static void stm32_ddr_stop_counters(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 217 { 218 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 219 220 writel_relaxed(r->stop.mask, pmu->membase + r->stop.reg); 221 } 222 223 static void stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu) 224 { 225 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 226 227 writel_relaxed(r->clear_time.mask, pmu->membase + r->clear_time.reg); 228 } 229 230 static void stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter) 231 { 232 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; 233 234 writel_relaxed(r->clear_cnt.mask & BIT(counter->idx), pmu->membase + r->clear_cnt.reg); 235 } 236 237 static void stm32_ddr_clear_counter(struct stm32_ddr_pmu *pmu, struct stm32_ddr_cnt *counter) 238 { 239 const struct stm32_ddr_pmu_regspec *r = pmu->cfg->regs; > 240 u32 status = readl_relaxed(pmu->membase + r->status.reg); 241 242 if (counter->idx == pmu->cfg->time_cnt_idx) 243 stm32_ddr_clear_time_counter(pmu); 244 else 245 stm32_ddr_clear_event_counter(pmu, counter); 246 247 if (status & r->status.mask) 248 dev_err(pmu->dev, "Failed to clear counter %i because the PMU is busy\n", 249 counter->idx); 250 } 251 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki