From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
security@kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify the expected collaboration with security bugs reporters
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 17:07:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025081655-proved-ladybug-4fa3@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250814192730.19252-1-w@1wt.eu>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 09:27:29PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Some bug reports sent to the security team sometimes lack any explanation,
> are only AI-generated without verification, or sometimes it can simply be
> difficult to have a conversation with an invisible reporter belonging to
> an opaque team. This fortunately remains rare but the trend has been
> steadily increasing over the last years and it seems important to clarify
> what developers expect from reporters to avoid frustration on any side and
> keep the process efficient.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> ---
> Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Both of these look good to me, thanks! I'll queue them up after the
next -rc is out.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-16 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 19:27 [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify the expected collaboration with security bugs reporters Willy Tarreau
2025-08-14 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: smooth the text flow in the security bug reporting process Willy Tarreau
2025-08-14 21:23 ` Kees Cook
2025-08-14 21:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: clarify the expected collaboration with security bugs reporters Kees Cook
2025-08-16 15:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025081655-proved-ladybug-4fa3@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).