From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BAA225408; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 15:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757086133; cv=none; b=ErJwssJvDkeffWpK5bcFVku9DXAwxZITJOe0BPN4hLXJ3gASTf6Y6+2pU8jlRMxDsOQPaBRisJQul1WcKfqBGyjJSjxdDS8l46scz7fuwb3gaTZIEuJlaGuiaXT8HsFCriVaC78gsYrOAeedIJyNZY+KUNA2mzutdoOJMM5r4Y4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757086133; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sPEEy5vULDAfl0FqPxMJIccT/9QzwSSYVorKW+7DqOw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lD3DCjnqSllmu9NpufXuE13MoWK8C7xxTIhYdUfK7SjjOMYVeCbiwlU20Gzj05YNhNVsfiA49setVke1eytRi1eiSz648HYLkNA6aTC9zBM8Zt5l6h2OB3XO7415v2MDMM/4/SHP9kEiLSQDm/37RntBosiQVotqwyEi9nsc59g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kfuKzJoB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kfuKzJoB" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F727C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 15:28:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757086133; bh=sPEEy5vULDAfl0FqPxMJIccT/9QzwSSYVorKW+7DqOw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kfuKzJoB7YDS6ZdqbW1seO4OuIsImFFTGR/bXgnGmFJpT8WbxoE0kxe+/AkT2++HE aM2+HP3yidLqlM3C+RLjI7Z5r8mzwoxE4wfa2ikahg+1BswcHiQsmrt5orqitio4Ea Qas/HwsGqrfN7eF5HmmhXZFQfIN7s0XA/8Rk4kwnC3vgtWWQo+sOJlC6GgRHRTukOh GciBrU64ZYTKgOP2Bqx1S4J+G3efY9zyq4RFVewODDTRq5TghYcbO/XOMJiJ6Z/wWt eB9VWDk6YF1Dork/u60T77O+xEjdWSGPRaBYnwNzwHVccac84mr6BwXDrUCjTAHOkF LPXsaZS7k04ow== Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:28:43 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Asuna Cc: Jason Montleon , Han Gao , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Danilo Krummrich , Jonathan Corbet , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Masahiro Yamada , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Tejun Heo , Kees Cook , Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Maurer , Jeff Xu , Shakeel Butt , Jan Hendrik Farr , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , Christian Brauner , Brian Gerst , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: re-enable gcc + rust builds Message-ID: <20250905-swipe-unstuck-dd7ad6e5466a@spud> References: <20250830-cheesy-prone-ee5fae406c22@spud> <20250903190806.2604757-1-SpriteOvO@gmail.com> <20250903190806.2604757-2-SpriteOvO@gmail.com> <20250904-sterilize-swagger-c7999b124e83@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cr2zhJdWyNpNS/E7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --cr2zhJdWyNpNS/E7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 06:56:35AM +0800, Asuna wrote: > > One thing - please don't send new versions > > of patchsets in response to earlier versions or other threads. It > > doesn't do you any favours with mailbox visibility. >=20 > I apologize for this, I'm pretty much new to mailing lists, so I had > followed the step "Explicit In-Reply-To headers" [1] in doc. For future > patches I'll send them alone instead of replying to existing threads. >=20 > [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.9/process/submitting-patches.html= #explicit-in-reply-to-headers Ye I think this is mostly just misleading. You're better off providing a lore link in the body of the mail than replying to some old thread. I find that explicit in-reply-to stuff only really helpful to send a single patch as part of a conversation where it's effectively an RFC. --cr2zhJdWyNpNS/E7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaLsBqwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0o8oAQDiIK6HL6oaYXWxQpproLYlTxZVq7be/QUm0+0M9Fhj4gEAyoX5K7PDnHGS NVoLGxCGdehDtQmXjvmrQUSeQfwA8Ao= =fC2y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cr2zhJdWyNpNS/E7--