linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rtapadia730@gmail.com
To: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Cc: mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com,
	simona@ffwll.ch, jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	Rajeev Tapadia <rtapadia730@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] drm/panel/lpm102a188a: Switch to mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi()
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:07:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250921183720.237761-2-rtapadia730@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Rajeev Tapadia <rtapadia730@gmail.com>

Replace deprecated mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq() calls with
mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(). This avoids hidden early returns
and matches the direction of other panel drivers.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Rajeev Tapadia <rtapadia730@gmail.com>
---

Question for reviewers:
In this patch, I switched to using mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi().
Currently, if both link1 and link2 return errors, only one error is
reported via accum_err. How should this ideally be handled? Should we
report the first error, the last, or combine them somehow?

 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lpm102a188a.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lpm102a188a.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lpm102a188a.c
index 5f897e143758..982cb61849a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lpm102a188a.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jdi-lpm102a188a.c
@@ -162,27 +162,34 @@ static int jdi_setup_symmetrical_split(struct mipi_dsi_device *left,
 static int jdi_write_dcdc_registers(struct jdi_panel *jdi)
 {
 	/* Clear the manufacturer command access protection */
-	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq(jdi->link1, MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT,
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx1 = {.dsi = jdi->link1};
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx2 = {.dsi = jdi->link2};
+
+	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx1, MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT,
 				   MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT_OFF);
-	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq(jdi->link2, MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT,
+	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx2, MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT,
 				   MCS_CMD_ACS_PROT_OFF);
 	/*
 	 * Change the VGH/VGL divide rations to move the noise generated by the
 	 * TCONN. This should hopefully avoid interaction with the backlight
 	 * controller.
 	 */
-	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq(jdi->link1, MCS_PWR_CTRL_FUNC,
+	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx1, MCS_PWR_CTRL_FUNC,
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM1_VGH_330_DIV |
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM1_DEFAULT,
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM2_VGL_410_DIV |
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM2_DEFAULT);
 
-	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq(jdi->link2, MCS_PWR_CTRL_FUNC,
+	mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx2, MCS_PWR_CTRL_FUNC,
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM1_VGH_330_DIV |
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM1_DEFAULT,
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM2_VGL_410_DIV |
 				   MCS_PWR_CTRL_PARAM2_DEFAULT);
 
+	if (dsi_ctx1.accum_err < 0)
+		return dsi_ctx1.accum_err;
+	if (dsi_ctx2.accum_err < 0)
+		return dsi_ctx2.accum_err;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.51.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-09-21 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-21 18:37 rtapadia730 [this message]
2025-09-21 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/mipi-dsi: remove deprecated write_seq macro and chatty helper rtapadia730
2025-09-21 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/mipi-dsi: remove deprecated mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty rtapadia730
2025-09-21 18:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/todo: remove todo entry for deprecated mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() rtapadia730
2025-10-29 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/panel/lpm102a188a: Switch to mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi() neil.armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250921183720.237761-2-rtapadia730@gmail.com \
    --to=rtapadia730@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jessica.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).