From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D4727FB1E; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761032150; cv=none; b=ouYbwThu7nS2m7q+MbBux2o3D9iq931qKtupmetEt07X8B7XE1LD5okJUV8qzhtNdDOZaH6e2ag1hOWFUPx61kbmSDBtbVAAOQ6rj6GbwQOJKDCeVDwTmBiBYh0LQzqnmE1IbELc/23ML0F7KAdv6ZOtjnR4vB3KLHA8HWSYHE0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761032150; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X7cRHSjXRGJM7wUbMm04IaWm8HIAEs4IU/+DZbQNmmY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TPO2vfZSWA5vyVYjfHVCEoSNoHRJf0h0I3fu6w02gs7rwy1jKCFll9OL5SxPtwbIDkyV8WDn6e3KoCL1nX1ZLLbkLy8+w3n2k86SM60H8i3iBNrcUKwBscdwTLwceqL6tGFDjzRxsErXisIqxMBa8tAmygFHKal+W7Y1Mn8Z3Ns= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ZF3m40Jn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="ZF3m40Jn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 296C3C4CEF1; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:35:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1761032149; bh=X7cRHSjXRGJM7wUbMm04IaWm8HIAEs4IU/+DZbQNmmY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZF3m40JnrkJq0Zzlrd/gSWdkTrS+ITLiIJ3P7bgYMqVPXjZmxslmq6eQr0R+IjNVK zFgBRM+8jrLmktKUGfCZLDORZcoyLGjuVDE1ufeVf0dvCe1wWXfFIZn2WuZ6HaYoMN CncWuoeFy18c5UJIW8HASO+lmdYsqxmBBotPfVtY= Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:35:46 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Gabriele Paoloni Cc: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, safety-architecture@lists.elisa.tech, acarmina@redhat.com, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, chuckwolber@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add testable code specifications Message-ID: <2025102111-facility-dismay-322e@gregkh> References: <20250910170000.6475-1-gpaoloni@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250910170000.6475-1-gpaoloni@redhat.com> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 06:59:57PM +0200, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > [1] was an initial proposal defining testable code specifications for > some functions in /drivers/char/mem.c. > However a Guideline to write such specifications was missing and test > cases tracing to such specifications were missing. > This patchset represents a next step and is organised as follows: > - patch 1/3 contains the Guideline for writing code specifications > - patch 2/3 contains examples of code specfications defined for some > functions of drivers/char/mem.c > - patch 3/3 contains examples of selftests that map to some code > specifications of patch 2/3 > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250821170419.70668-1-gpaoloni@redhat.com/ "RFC" implies there is a request. I don't see that here, am I missing that? Or is this "good to go" and want us to seriously consider accepting this? thanks, greg k-h