From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFEB7295D90; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:56:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762275366; cv=none; b=FAc5pUMG65Q/eejDSFRvlXi6i2aWptUGLheugnDn8qLsoH5K+9lwRtpYtW6HauQXNodk/tcZl4yMO0odOevIleA5381Xdgw1B81+T3Q063Q3QvtCWQMkN7A9Xc0sw5hfBRJA9zjm9XQn3kBANVDl5XmOysZ8PLFWBlBFDECaIS0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762275366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eqs2yq51xWQnT3gXWbJSq5lHBNf62/pOzGYULwBh50I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KLbR/1EXGXOszqdDQhHFN4GPtpO8JWoMfDhWmLdtJc3fCbgqqJvWaUvHmfLwvvTgbPEtWZUPg1euVpW6kCK8MC1QBdQW7k/hWJnOst/ls2AZCwloZMJdf+m10XwBRm7bRVMzK9rN670U49bMzBEG8hW4N9vH34QjJmqgDLmZnY8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=aU0EsDIp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="aU0EsDIp" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2333FC4CEF8; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 16:56:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762275366; bh=eqs2yq51xWQnT3gXWbJSq5lHBNf62/pOzGYULwBh50I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aU0EsDIpiBnA1pOZOB8EDfxEdQlvUcdteg3YBFzkUOP4Wzx6nsRl5wihR5p7KwN/W m55gBob7NhOtqh2QXNbarob/gg0gvYzsCiJQwPjr6I5JoKQ2/E6V+rYg9hbI9sYEaJ TIebu5dyJW/p6aBpLBLw60TqNFjsb9lV2x2B8HNgjdefkhub8IJ1wlJpmfxfK42xjj 9WEsUmkbxRe4arRP+d7a5wvlU66t7Z4MV6wpyy9tKMnhwicj4HTljxEqFfn8NEOy87 BpFsMQ8lw+R8C2dpDzkiC2iWdHnV+vyMoi522rjo2FMyRJmlRJrT9MeHqtfDK9Xh2v EP8CxaO5fU9ow== Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 08:56:05 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Gou Hao Cc: cem@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gouhaojake@163.com, guanwentao@uniontech.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs-doc: Fix typo error Message-ID: <20251104165605.GI196370@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20251104093406.9135-1-gouhao@uniontech.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251104093406.9135-1-gouhao@uniontech.com> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 05:34:06PM +0800, Gou Hao wrote: > online fsck may take longer than offline fsck... > > Signed-off-by: Gou Hao With hch's comments about the commit message addressed, Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --D > --- > Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst > index 8cbcd3c26434..55e727b5f12e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ sharing and lock acquisition rules as the regular filesystem. > This means that scrub cannot take *any* shortcuts to save time, because doing > so could lead to concurrency problems. > In other words, online fsck is not a complete replacement for offline fsck, and > -a complete run of online fsck may take longer than online fsck. > +a complete run of online fsck may take longer than offline fsck. > However, both of these limitations are acceptable tradeoffs to satisfy the > different motivations of online fsck, which are to **minimize system downtime** > and to **increase predictability of operation**. > -- > 2.20.1 > >