From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Natalie Vock" <natalie.vock@gmx.de>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@lankhorst.se>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] docs: cgroup: Note about sibling relative reclaim protection
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 20:36:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110193638.623208-3-mkoutny@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110193638.623208-1-mkoutny@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
index a6def773a3072..be3d805a929ef 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -1952,6 +1952,10 @@ targets ancestors of A, the effective protection of B is capped by the
protection value configured for A (and any other intermediate ancestors between
A and the target).
+To express indifference about relative sibling protection, it is suggested to
+use memory_recursiveprot. Configuring all descendants of a parent with finite
+protection to "max" works but it may unnecessarily skew memory.events:low
+field.
Memory Ownership
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 19:36 [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Memory reclaim documentation fixes Michal Koutný
2025-11-10 19:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/3] docs: cgroup: Explain reclaim protection target Michal Koutný
2025-11-10 20:00 ` Jonathan Corbet
2025-11-14 18:29 ` Michal Koutný
2025-11-14 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2025-11-10 19:36 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2025-11-10 19:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/3] docs: cgroup: No special handling of unpopulated memcgs Michal Koutný
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110193638.623208-3-mkoutny@suse.com \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=natalie.vock@gmx.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).