From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
zhongjinji@honor.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 01:25:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209012557.1949239-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251209012557.1949239-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Currently, flush_reclaim_state is placed differently between
shrink_node_memcgs and shrink_many. shrink_many (only used for gen-LRU)
calls it after each lruvec is shrunk, while shrink_node_memcgs calls it
only after all lruvecs have been shrunk.
This patch moves flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs and calls it
after each lruvec. This unifies the behavior and is reasonable because:
1. flush_reclaim_state adds current->reclaim_state->reclaimed to
sc->nr_reclaimed.
2. For non-MGLRU root reclaim, this can help stop the iteration earlier
when nr_to_reclaim is reached.
3. For non-root reclaim, the effect is negligible since flush_reclaim_state
does nothing in that case.
After moving flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs, shrink_one can be
extended to support both lrugen and non-lrugen paths. It will call
try_to_shrink_lruvec for lrugen root reclaim and shrink_lruvec otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 584f41eb4c14..795f5ebd9341 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4758,23 +4758,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
return nr_to_scan < 0;
}
-static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
- unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
- unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
- struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
-
- try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
- shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
-
- if (!sc->proactive)
- vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
- sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
-
- flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-}
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc);
static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
{
@@ -5760,6 +5744,27 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;
}
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
+ unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+
+ if (lru_gen_enabled() && root_reclaim(sc))
+ try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+ else
+ shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+
+ shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
+
+ if (!sc->proactive)
+ vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
+ sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+
+ flush_reclaim_state(sc);
+}
+
static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -5784,8 +5789,6 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
do {
struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
- unsigned long reclaimed;
- unsigned long scanned;
/*
* This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
@@ -5817,19 +5820,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
}
- reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
- scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
- shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
- shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
- sc->priority);
-
- /* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
- if (!sc->proactive)
- vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
- sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
- sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+ shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
@@ -5863,8 +5854,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
- flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-
nr_node_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 1:25 [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 1/5] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 2/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-12-12 2:55 ` [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen kernel test robot
2025-12-12 9:53 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 4/5] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 5/5] mm/mglru: factor lrugen state out of shrink_lruvec Chen Ridong
2025-12-12 10:15 ` [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251209012557.1949239-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhongjinji@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).