linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
	yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
	vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
	mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
	muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
	zhongjinji@honor.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen
Date: Tue,  9 Dec 2025 01:25:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209012557.1949239-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251209012557.1949239-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>

From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>

Currently, flush_reclaim_state is placed differently between
shrink_node_memcgs and shrink_many. shrink_many (only used for gen-LRU)
calls it after each lruvec is shrunk, while shrink_node_memcgs calls it
only after all lruvecs have been shrunk.

This patch moves flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs and calls it
after each lruvec. This unifies the behavior and is reasonable because:

1. flush_reclaim_state adds current->reclaim_state->reclaimed to
   sc->nr_reclaimed.
2. For non-MGLRU root reclaim, this can help stop the iteration earlier
   when nr_to_reclaim is reached.
3. For non-root reclaim, the effect is negligible since flush_reclaim_state
   does nothing in that case.

After moving flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs, shrink_one can be
extended to support both lrugen and non-lrugen paths. It will call
try_to_shrink_lruvec for lrugen root reclaim and shrink_lruvec otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 584f41eb4c14..795f5ebd9341 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4758,23 +4758,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 	return nr_to_scan < 0;
 }
 
-static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
-	unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-	unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
-	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
-
-	try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
-	shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
-
-	if (!sc->proactive)
-		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
-			   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
-
-	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-}
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc);
 
 static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
@@ -5760,6 +5744,27 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 	return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;
 }
 
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
+	unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
+	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+
+	if (lru_gen_enabled() && root_reclaim(sc))
+		try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+	else
+		shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+
+	shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
+
+	if (!sc->proactive)
+		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
+			   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+
+	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
+}
+
 static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -5784,8 +5789,6 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
 	do {
 		struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-		unsigned long reclaimed;
-		unsigned long scanned;
 
 		/*
 		 * This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
@@ -5817,19 +5820,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 			memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
 		}
 
-		reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
-		scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
-		shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
-		shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
-			    sc->priority);
-
-		/* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
-		if (!sc->proactive)
-			vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
-				   sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
-				   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+		shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
 
 		/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
 		if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
@@ -5863,8 +5854,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 	shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
 
-	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-
 	nr_node_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
 
 	/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-09  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-09  1:25 [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09  1:25 ` [PATCH -next 1/5] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-09  1:25 ` [PATCH -next 2/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09  1:25 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-12-12  2:55   ` [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen kernel test robot
2025-12-12  9:53     ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-09  1:25 ` [PATCH -next 4/5] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs Chen Ridong
2025-12-09  1:25 ` [PATCH -next 5/5] mm/mglru: factor lrugen state out of shrink_lruvec Chen Ridong
2025-12-12 10:15 ` [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251209012557.1949239-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    --cc=zhongjinji@honor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).