From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, axelrasmussen@google.com,
yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, david@kernel.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, corbet@lwn.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
muchun.song@linux.dev, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
lujialin4@huawei.com, chenridong@huaweicloud.com,
zhongjinji@honor.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 4/5] mm/mglru: combine shrink_many into shrink_node_memcgs
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 01:25:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251209012557.1949239-5-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251209012557.1949239-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
The previous patch extended shrink_one to support both lrugen and
non-lrugen reclaim. Now shrink_many and shrink_node_memcgs are almost
identical, except that shrink_many also calls should_abort_scan for lrugen
root reclaim.
This patch adds the should_abort_scan check to shrink_node_memcgs (which is
only meaningful for gen-LRU root reclaim). After this change,
shrink_node_memcgs can be used directly instead of shrink_many, allowing
shrink_many to be safely removed.
Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 67 ++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 795f5ebd9341..dbf2cfbe3243 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4758,57 +4758,6 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
return nr_to_scan < 0;
}
-static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc);
-
-static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
- struct mem_cgroup *target = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
- struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = {
- .pgdat = pgdat,
- };
- struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie *cookie = &reclaim;
- struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
-
- if (current_is_kswapd() || sc->memcg_full_walk)
- cookie = NULL;
-
- memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target, NULL, cookie);
- while (memcg) {
- struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-
- cond_resched();
-
- mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(target, memcg);
-
- if (mem_cgroup_below_min(target, memcg))
- goto next;
-
- if (mem_cgroup_below_low(target, memcg)) {
- if (!sc->memcg_low_reclaim) {
- sc->memcg_low_skipped = 1;
- goto next;
- }
- memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
- }
-
- shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
-
- if (should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
- if (cookie)
- mem_cgroup_iter_break(target, memcg);
- break;
- }
-
-next:
- if (cookie && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
- mem_cgroup_iter_break(target, memcg);
- break;
- }
-
- memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target, memcg, cookie);
- }
-}
-
static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4829,6 +4778,9 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
}
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc);
+static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc);
+
static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
{
struct blk_plug plug;
@@ -4858,7 +4810,7 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *
if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
shrink_one(&pgdat->__lruvec, sc);
else
- shrink_many(pgdat, sc);
+ shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
if (current_is_kswapd())
sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaimed;
@@ -5554,6 +5506,11 @@ static void lru_gen_shrink_node(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *
BUILD_BUG();
}
+static bool should_abort_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_LRU_GEN */
static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
@@ -5822,6 +5779,12 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
+ if (should_abort_scan(lruvec, sc)) {
+ if (partial)
+ mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
+ break;
+ }
+
/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
mem_cgroup_iter_break(target_memcg, memcg);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 1:25 [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 1/5] mm/mglru: use mem_cgroup_iter for global reclaim Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 2/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen Chen Ridong
2025-12-12 2:55 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-12 9:53 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-09 1:25 ` Chen Ridong [this message]
2025-12-09 1:25 ` [PATCH -next 5/5] mm/mglru: factor lrugen state out of shrink_lruvec Chen Ridong
2025-12-12 10:15 ` [PATCH -next 0/5] mm/mglru: remove memcg lru Chen Ridong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251209012557.1949239-5-chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--to=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhongjinji@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).