linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com, Michael.Zhao2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] ras: add estatus vendor handling and processing
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:04:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218170453.23be9049@foz.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251217112845.1814119-4-ahmed.tiba@arm.com>

Em Wed, 17 Dec 2025 11:28:36 +0000
Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com> escreveu:

> Teach the estatus core how to walk CPER records and expose the vendor
> record notification path. This adds the section iteration helpers,
> the logging helpers that mirror the GHES behaviour, and the deferred
> work used to hand vendor GUIDs to interested drivers. No users switch
> over yet; this simply moves the common logic out of GHES so the next
> patches can wire it up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed Tiba <ahmed.tiba@arm.com>

...

> +static bool estatus_handle_arm_hw_error(estatus_generic_data *gdata, int sev, bool sync)

Huh?

This is a CPER record from GHES. Why are you moving CPER code out
of ghes.c, placing in a file named estatus.c? Doesn't make much
sense on my eyes...

Same applies to to other GHES CPER record types.


Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-17 11:28 [PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] ras: add estatus core interfaces Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] ras: add estatus core implementation Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 15:42   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-19 14:35     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21 19:31   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] ras: add estatus vendor handling and processing Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 16:04   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2025-12-19 14:49     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 15:30       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-19 18:11         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-22  8:13           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-12-29 15:01             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21 23:39   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] ras: add estatus queuing and IRQ/NMI handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] ras: flesh out estatus processing core Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] efi/cper: adopt estatus iteration helpers Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] ghes: prepare estatus hooks for shared handling Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] ghes: add estatus provider ops Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] ghes: route error handling through shared estatus core Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] dt-bindings: ras: document estatus provider Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:41   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-17 17:49     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18  6:48       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-18 10:22         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 10:31         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19  9:53           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-12-19 10:37             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 10:47             ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] ras: add DeviceTree estatus provider driver Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 12:13   ` Will Deacon
2025-12-18 13:42     ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-18 15:19       ` Will Deacon
2025-12-19  9:02         ` Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-19 13:00           ` Will Deacon
2025-12-19 17:21             ` Ahmed Tiba
2026-01-05 21:09               ` Will Deacon
2025-12-17 11:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] doc: ras: describe firmware-first estatus flow Ahmed Tiba
2025-12-21  1:35 ` [PATCH 00/12] ras: share firmware-first estatus handling Borislav Petkov
2025-12-29 11:54   ` Ahmed Tiba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251218170453.23be9049@foz.lan \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dmitry.Lamerov@arm.com \
    --cc=Michael.Zhao2@arm.com \
    --cc=ahmed.tiba@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).