From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD54242D9B; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 22:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766529284; cv=none; b=BG7PtDXIEusnSBHzPBU2dcX2MS4rq23vGkkrQoyC5ij4LcMJ7u4bevOXfgA26ZYZpgUBVELZViJfh0Cdz6zd+dldaDW40KXkyMyAhvnrrntzueMH3JtPHjqToyUEkCtqe2LHy+JF8qORFLVflzTX0InBzb40K+Boxu+1CecWZtw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766529284; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Fes5loOBsU+mC0Ceq2TtLjtj3mpKZi3TTjEVwXp7psU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D7t8+rtOdhoYowWbuC5/xiEMy4y1o4Spc9lfCGM8nlcZP51z4/dxmHlgb2l3J2yxtk77jhyjhU+xyjjrEMZjoE53XJ144FU8SN1usNU6M/p6YtDvRF2Cf5sFw8DlsBPLkE1zDXwBrRjh4lpPmATbGRDLiAL62Zj19P7Nat/DIh8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DN+8W+Dh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DN+8W+Dh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766529283; x=1798065283; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Fes5loOBsU+mC0Ceq2TtLjtj3mpKZi3TTjEVwXp7psU=; b=DN+8W+DhrAHUUEqjjd2UebXZVTEg2omWxL9EjbfxVy4k+5gXyW7uTfp0 hAGBxnCA2bDlEVVknG58dMh4NpJgPrTehu1PAIytXmQTZPgYHNs4oxrOC DSxnjBGovPBi1DzyZ/VeJnA1aKEbFf14rFPAjggS8HFYeAUrHaHhhAtQt r1PuHvnZ7hqb0DYYup2AiHg1wN/3lnO2hO3jzA3ZlTgIZqtbtH8m6t841 CxrB7VpLiqIF1a7rp3f1FsxALEuuiRsJPWTpF748kLyiQyrzVCChiWj64 sT18rFNpCxCo7JpMgQZp/CAsQkKMVTKsrG9o+O5Gc4SXNR2FeCTH7Kpg9 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: s0azDM5YTXCSSqisgF6WUA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: mHsPy1L2SLKo+1MJ0yzjdw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11651"; a="79099102" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,172,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="79099102" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Dec 2025 14:34:41 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kdb3EiWAQeqPbPvmCjRM3w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YKgfYRbQRqympAkXtZtTdQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,172,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="204414911" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO dd3453e2b682) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2025 14:34:38 -0800 Received: from kbuild by dd3453e2b682 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vYAxg-000000002RN-0Dgu; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 22:34:36 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 06:33:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Aaron Tomlin , rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, corbet@lwn.net Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, atomlin@atomlin.com, sean@ashe.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add bitmask-list option for human-readable bitmask display Message-ID: <202512240638.SumtF5C4-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Hi Aaron, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aaron-Tomlin/tracing-Add-bitmask-list-option-for-human-readable-bitmask-display/20251223-120923 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin%40atomlin.com patch subject: [PATCH] tracing: Add bitmask-list option for human-readable bitmask display config: s390-randconfig-r071-20251224 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512240638.SumtF5C4-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512240638.SumtF5C4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512240638.SumtF5C4-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace_output.c: In function 'trace_print_bitmask_seq': >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:202:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_get_global_array'; did you mean 'ftrace_init_global_array_ops'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] const struct trace_array *tr = trace_get_global_array(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ftrace_init_global_array_ops >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:202:33: warning: initialization of 'const struct trace_array *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +202 kernel/trace/trace_output.c 196 197 const char * 198 trace_print_bitmask_seq(struct trace_seq *p, void *bitmask_ptr, 199 unsigned int bitmask_size) 200 { 201 const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p); > 202 const struct trace_array *tr = trace_get_global_array(); 203 bool show_bitmask_list = tr->trace_flags & 204 TRACE_ITER(BITMASK_LIST); 205 206 trace_seq_bitmask(p, bitmask_ptr, bitmask_size * 8, 207 show_bitmask_list); 208 trace_seq_putc(p, 0); 209 210 return ret; 211 } 212 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_print_bitmask_seq); 213 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki