From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5482DC357; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766532416; cv=none; b=N3WrJF9X0LLhL317cqVFPLn/BoLEILwl4eTYE3uYW/qtoStfaSyIIldQyLtsBr7maFe44NZJx0Z6QvyccnWq83em/vI6LlVH1kr0ni/SakAmqD73/4+Zug+O/xdJcD3xHUZ9SMkyoSXARF0DW4vYN4I6SHJ7X8bwplOuPCpwZ5k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766532416; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tw8UXfWso5ZhHWbNrvlqYW+gPtiQiCffnCLVViVVMJA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DmC46+8QqA6lgEHlSVfRuujhmJKxNzxpuihLMjdSZOinxUuigo4n39G6rT4pqAPW/p7bsduIJsQmVPheOExuEpLNLsPjeox+9P2deDhe1NPC48yzjeNqnKXk/Vo8GxAPZG26SPtgJJFFncsbV00Y8uGmk0FEfxtOE/0FJOCDGCg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QshJ+71f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QshJ+71f" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766532415; x=1798068415; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Tw8UXfWso5ZhHWbNrvlqYW+gPtiQiCffnCLVViVVMJA=; b=QshJ+71f2oqLHQwwq/nAKaqdsklP1weiG0rhQX1YRyU6kVK7uCShzC+/ TbAUa27XBYlOp4/4UhAg8tamWePehHw/nWZQEcF3TPUl+K9Ef8QOAC6Hm vLFAxuZxdhfilVjSGEkGJjb0L6JYYWaOcFVocjg4p+29tVLUaGUOA3MhO 7GnrEwEYbHHkMba1ARPXDB2OYicbzK/O/LYHy3BWGsojNvtg1KVQ4k7zv q61xn9DGMIAI+FU5UAU/h33q3jYi5DLBEEmTxIV4EyasOLAslWXFo0fn7 TK6rjwD7bYWFOB7IiyJZGkLSkXibQROC/4QHPFNvWxlHmPN8NH1sRviYo Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: E5hocf+tSKaI4dkhF5egvQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7+E/oEE6TzWTCUi8uyJEbQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11651"; a="68262038" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,172,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="68262038" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Dec 2025 15:26:55 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ej3pIFH8Siu+t+Ohp6Z4PQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fUmbiYWtSY6SST1jNYIyPg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,172,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="199639655" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO dd3453e2b682) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2025 15:26:51 -0800 Received: from kbuild by dd3453e2b682 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vYBmD-000000002Th-1WRB; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:26:49 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:26:10 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Aaron Tomlin , rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, corbet@lwn.net Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, atomlin@atomlin.com, sean@ashe.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Add bitmask-list option for human-readable bitmask display Message-ID: <202512240709.cPAuuxFj-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> Hi Aaron, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trace/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aaron-Tomlin/tracing-Add-bitmask-list-option-for-human-readable-bitmask-display/20251223-120923 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223035622.2084081-1-atomlin%40atomlin.com patch subject: [PATCH] tracing: Add bitmask-list option for human-readable bitmask display config: i386-randconfig-141-20251224 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512240709.cPAuuxFj-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512240709.cPAuuxFj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512240709.cPAuuxFj-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/trace/trace_output.c: In function 'trace_print_bitmask_seq': kernel/trace/trace_output.c:202:40: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_get_global_array'; did you mean 'ftrace_init_global_array_ops'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 202 | const struct trace_array *tr = trace_get_global_array(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ftrace_init_global_array_ops >> kernel/trace/trace_output.c:202:40: error: initialization of 'const struct trace_array *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] vim +202 kernel/trace/trace_output.c 196 197 const char * 198 trace_print_bitmask_seq(struct trace_seq *p, void *bitmask_ptr, 199 unsigned int bitmask_size) 200 { 201 const char *ret = trace_seq_buffer_ptr(p); > 202 const struct trace_array *tr = trace_get_global_array(); 203 bool show_bitmask_list = tr->trace_flags & 204 TRACE_ITER(BITMASK_LIST); 205 206 trace_seq_bitmask(p, bitmask_ptr, bitmask_size * 8, 207 show_bitmask_list); 208 trace_seq_putc(p, 0); 209 210 return ret; 211 } 212 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_print_bitmask_seq); 213 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki