linux-doc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	robert.moore@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
	zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	ray.huang@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	mario.limonciello@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
	ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, nhartman@nvidia.com,
	bbasu@nvidia.com, sumitg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:32:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223121307.711773-8-sumitg@nvidia.com>

Hi Sumit,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sumit-Gupta/cpufreq-CPPC-Add-generic-helpers-for-sysfs-show-store/20251224-001833
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223121307.711773-8-sumitg%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Using alabaster theme
   ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pci.h
   WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/pci.h
   ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
   WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:356: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [docutils]
   ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/bootconfig.h
   WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/bootconfig.h
   ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h
   ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h
   WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h


vim +356 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu

   347	
   348			Read/write a frequency value in kHz from/to this file. This
   349			file sets the maximum performance level (as frequency) at
   350			which the platform may run. The frequency value is internally
   351			converted to a performance value and must be in the range
   352			[cpuinfo_min_freq, cpuinfo_max_freq], inclusive.
   353	
   354			This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is in use.
   355	
 > 356	What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/perf_limited
   357	Date:		February 2026
   358	Contact:	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
   359	Description:	Performance Limited
   360	
   361			Read to check if platform throttling (thermal/power/current
   362			limits) caused delivered performance to fall below the
   363			requested level. A non-zero value indicates throttling occurred.
   364	
   365			Write the bitmask of bits to clear:
   366			  1 = clear bit 0 (desired performance excursion)
   367			  2 = clear bit 1 (minimum performance excursion)
   368			  3 = clear both bits
   369			The platform sets these bits; OSPM can only clear them.
   370	
   371			This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is in use.
   372	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-24 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-23 12:12 [PATCH v5 00/11] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25  3:41   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and cppc_perf_ctrls structs Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25  8:21   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ACPI: CPPC: Extend cppc_set_epp_perf() to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25  3:56   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25  9:03   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 12:06   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-24 18:32   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-12-26  0:20   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when updating min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 13:56   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26  2:55   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] cpufreq: CPPC: make scaling_min/max_freq read-only when auto_sel enabled Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26  3:26   ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26  8:03   ` zhenglifeng (A)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).