From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
robert.moore@intel.com, corbet@lwn.net, pierre.gondois@arm.com,
zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
ray.huang@amd.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
ionela.voinescu@arm.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, nhartman@nvidia.com,
bbasu@nvidia.com, sumitg@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:32:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223121307.711773-8-sumitg@nvidia.com>
Hi Sumit,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sumit-Gupta/cpufreq-CPPC-Add-generic-helpers-for-sysfs-show-store/20251224-001833
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223121307.711773-8-sumitg%40nvidia.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
Using alabaster theme
ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pci.h
WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/pci.h
ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu:356: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. [docutils]
ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/bootconfig.h
WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/bootconfig.h
ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h
ERROR: Cannot find file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h
WARNING: No kernel-doc for file ./include/linux/pstore_zone.h
vim +356 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
347
348 Read/write a frequency value in kHz from/to this file. This
349 file sets the maximum performance level (as frequency) at
350 which the platform may run. The frequency value is internally
351 converted to a performance value and must be in the range
352 [cpuinfo_min_freq, cpuinfo_max_freq], inclusive.
353
354 This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is in use.
355
> 356 What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/perf_limited
357 Date: February 2026
358 Contact: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
359 Description: Performance Limited
360
361 Read to check if platform throttling (thermal/power/current
362 limits) caused delivered performance to fall below the
363 requested level. A non-zero value indicates throttling occurred.
364
365 Write the bitmask of bits to clear:
366 1 = clear bit 0 (desired performance excursion)
367 2 = clear bit 1 (minimum performance excursion)
368 3 = clear both bits
369 The platform sets these bits; OSPM can only clear them.
370
371 This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is in use.
372
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-24 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 12:12 [PATCH v5 00/11] Enhanced autonomous selection and improvements Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/store Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:41 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] ACPI: CPPC: Clean up cppc_perf_caps and cppc_perf_ctrls structs Sumit Gupta
2025-12-23 12:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controls Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 8:21 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] ACPI: CPPC: Extend cppc_set_epp_perf() to support auto_sel and epp Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 3:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 9:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 12:06 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] cpufreq: CPPC: Add sysfs for min/max_perf and perf_limited Sumit Gupta
2025-12-24 18:32 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-12-26 0:20 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when updating min/max_perf Sumit Gupta
2025-12-25 13:56 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] cpufreq: CPPC: sync policy limits when toggling auto_select Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 2:55 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] cpufreq: CPPC: make scaling_min/max_freq read-only when auto_sel enabled Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 3:26 ` zhenglifeng (A)
2025-12-23 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] cpufreq: CPPC: add autonomous mode boot parameter support Sumit Gupta
2025-12-26 8:03 ` zhenglifeng (A)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202512241930.heuhsbt9-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nhartman@nvidia.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).