From: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>,
Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:24:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-3-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-0-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com>
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.
If backtrace suppression does _not_ work, the unit tests will likely
trigger unsuppressed backtraces, which should actually help to get
the affected architectures / platforms fixed.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
---
lib/kunit/Makefile | 3 +
lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
index fe177ff3ebdef..b2f2b8ada7b71 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
+++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ obj-$(if $(CONFIG_KUNIT),y) += hooks.o \
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += platform-test.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += backtrace-suppression-test.o
+endif
# string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..524aecee0ee23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for suppressing warning tracebacks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024, Guenter Roeck
+ * Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn(void)
+{
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ trigger_backtrace_warn();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+ trigger_backtrace_warn();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi), 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KALLSYMS))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE or CONFIG_KALLSYMS");
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(
+ backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn_on(void)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE");
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+ trigger_backtrace_warn_on();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn_on), 1);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case backtrace_suppression_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite backtrace_suppression_test_suite = {
+ .name = "backtrace-suppression-test",
+ .test_cases = backtrace_suppression_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suites(&backtrace_suppression_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test to verify warning backtrace suppression");
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 9:24 [PATCH v6 0/5] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] bug/kunit: Core " Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] bug/kunit: Suppressing warning backtraces reduced impact on WARN*() sites Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 9:24 ` Albert Esteve [this message]
2026-03-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 9:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 10:03 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Dan Carpenter
2026-03-17 14:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-17 11:20 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-17 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-17 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-18 9:25 ` Albert Esteve
2026-03-18 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-3-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com \
--to=aesteve@redhat.com \
--cc=acarmina@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox