public inbox for linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <david@davidgow.net>,  Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
	 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	 David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	 Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>,
	 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	 Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>,
	 Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 3/5] Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:24:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-3-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-0-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com>

From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.

If backtrace suppression does _not_ work, the unit tests will likely
trigger unsuppressed backtraces, which should actually help to get
the affected architectures / platforms fixed.

Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
---
 lib/kunit/Makefile                     |   3 +
 lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/Makefile b/lib/kunit/Makefile
index fe177ff3ebdef..b2f2b8ada7b71 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile
+++ b/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ obj-$(if $(CONFIG_KUNIT),y) +=		hooks.o \
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		kunit-test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		platform-test.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) +=		backtrace-suppression-test.o
+endif
 
 # string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..524aecee0ee23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for suppressing warning tracebacks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024, Guenter Roeck
+ * Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn(void)
+{
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	trigger_backtrace_warn();
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+	trigger_backtrace_warn();
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi), 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KALLSYMS))
+		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE or CONFIG_KALLSYMS");
+
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+	WARN_ON(1);
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(
+				backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn_on(void)
+{
+	WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE))
+		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE");
+
+	KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+	trigger_backtrace_warn_on();
+	KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, KUNIT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn_on), 1);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case backtrace_suppression_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct),
+	KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite backtrace_suppression_test_suite = {
+	.name = "backtrace-suppression-test",
+	.test_cases = backtrace_suppression_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suites(&backtrace_suppression_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test to verify warning backtrace suppression");

-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17  9:24 [PATCH v6 0/5] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Albert Esteve
2026-03-17  9:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] bug/kunit: Core " Albert Esteve
2026-03-17  9:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] bug/kunit: Suppressing warning backtraces reduced impact on WARN*() sites Albert Esteve
2026-03-17  9:24 ` Albert Esteve [this message]
2026-03-17  9:24 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests Albert Esteve
2026-03-17  9:24 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API Albert Esteve
2026-03-17 10:03 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Dan Carpenter
2026-03-17 14:55   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-17 11:20 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-17 11:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-03-17 15:02     ` Guenter Roeck
2026-03-18  9:25     ` Albert Esteve
2026-03-18 11:51       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-3-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com \
    --to=aesteve@redhat.com \
    --cc=acarmina@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft@linaro.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox