From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/30] KVM: arm64: Factor SVE code out of fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host()
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:49:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260318174946.GJ2390801@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260306-kvm-arm64-sme-v10-12-43f7683a0fb7@kernel.org>
On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 05:01:04PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Since the function will grow as a result of adding SME support move the
> SVE code out of fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(). No functional change, just
> code motion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> index 4e38610be19a..5b99aa479c59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
> @@ -483,11 +483,11 @@ static inline void fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
> }
>
> -static inline void fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline void sve_lazy_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> u64 zcr_el1, zcr_el2;
>
> - if (!guest_owns_fp_regs())
> + if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> return;
>
> /*
> @@ -498,29 +498,35 @@ static inline void fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * synchronization event, we don't need an ISB here to avoid taking
> * traps for anything that was exposed to the guest.
> */
> - if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu)) {
> - zcr_el1 = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ZCR);
> - __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, vcpu_sve_zcr_elx(vcpu), zcr_el1);
> + zcr_el1 = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_ZCR);
> + __vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, vcpu_sve_zcr_elx(vcpu), zcr_el1);
>
> - /*
> - * The guest's state is always saved using the guest's max VL.
> - * Ensure that the host has the guest's max VL active such that
> - * the host can save the guest's state lazily, but don't
> - * artificially restrict the host to the guest's max VL.
> - */
> - if (has_vhe()) {
> - zcr_el2 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> - write_sysreg_el2(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR);
> - } else {
> - zcr_el2 = sve_vq_from_vl(kvm_host_max_vl[ARM64_VEC_SVE]) - 1;
> - write_sysreg_el2(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR);
> + /*
> + * The guest's state is always saved using the guest's max VL.
> + * Ensure that the host has the guest's max VL active such
> + * that the host can save the guest's state lazily, but don't
> + * artificially restrict the host to the guest's max VL.
> + */
> + if (has_vhe()) {
> + zcr_el2 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> + write_sysreg_el2(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR);
> + } else {
> + zcr_el2 = sve_vq_from_vl(kvm_host_max_vl[ARM64_VEC_SVE]) - 1;
> + write_sysreg_el2(zcr_el2, SYS_ZCR);
>
> - zcr_el1 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> - write_sysreg_el1(zcr_el1, SYS_ZCR);
> - }
> + zcr_el1 = vcpu_sve_max_vq(vcpu) - 1;
> + write_sysreg_el1(zcr_el1, SYS_ZCR);
> }
> }
>
> +static inline void fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + if (!guest_owns_fp_regs())
> + return;
> +
> + sve_lazy_switch_to_host(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> static void kvm_hyp_save_fpsimd_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> /*
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 17:00 [PATCH v10 00/30] KVM: arm64: Implement support for SME Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 01/30] arm64/sysreg: Update SMIDR_EL1 to DDI0601 2025-06 Mark Brown
2026-03-16 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 02/30] arm64/fpsimd: Update FA64 and ZT0 enables when loading SME state Mark Brown
2026-03-16 17:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 03/30] arm64/fpsimd: Decide to save ZT0 and streaming mode FFR at bind time Mark Brown
2026-03-16 17:42 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 04/30] arm64/fpsimd: Determine maximum virtualisable SME vector length Mark Brown
2026-03-16 17:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-03-18 17:29 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 05/30] KVM: arm64: Pay attention to FFR parameter in SVE save and load Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:30 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 06/30] KVM: arm64: Pull ctxt_has_ helpers to start of sysreg-sr.h Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:00 ` [PATCH v10 07/30] KVM: arm64: Move SVE state access macros after feature test macros Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:32 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 08/30] KVM: arm64: Rename SVE finalization constants to be more general Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 09/30] KVM: arm64: Define internal features for SME Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:44 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-18 17:50 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 10/30] KVM: arm64: Rename sve_state_reg_region Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:46 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 11/30] KVM: arm64: Store vector lengths in an array Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:48 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 12/30] KVM: arm64: Factor SVE code out of fpsimd_lazy_switch_to_host() Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:49 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 13/30] KVM: arm64: Document the KVM ABI for SME Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:51 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 14/30] KVM: arm64: Implement SME vector length configuration Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:53 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 15/30] KVM: arm64: Support SME control registers Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:54 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 16/30] KVM: arm64: Support TPIDR2_EL0 Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:55 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 17/30] KVM: arm64: Support SME identification registers for guests Mark Brown
2026-03-18 17:27 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 18/30] KVM: arm64: Support SME priority registers Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 19/30] KVM: arm64: Provide assembly for SME register access Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 20/30] KVM: arm64: Support userspace access to streaming mode Z and P registers Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 21/30] KVM: arm64: Flush register state on writes to SVCR.SM and SVCR.ZA Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 22/30] KVM: arm64: Expose SME specific state to userspace Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 23/30] KVM: arm64: Context switch SME state for guests Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 24/30] KVM: arm64: Handle SME exceptions Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 25/30] KVM: arm64: Expose SME to nested guests Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 26/30] KVM: arm64: Provide interface for configuring and enabling SME for guests Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 27/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 28/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Skip impossible invalid value tests Mark Brown
2026-03-24 14:54 ` Ben Horgan
2026-03-24 14:56 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 29/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add SME system registers to get-reg-list Mark Brown
2026-03-06 17:01 ` [PATCH v10 30/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add SME to set_id_regs test Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260318174946.GJ2390801@myrica \
--to=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox