From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE058371046 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774478425; cv=none; b=OUTVYp57tQFRRIQv6y5nsfloCmagvjP7yauBeFxmx7T9C1K2plbVSGpQ21RB/RDml/KezOaUMIh6/XBrcDfsANdt0ak0jqbq7kdSlc5mBhTlkAZdXF4WFJbuvJ9G4YNKvL/WwK0ClENphh05nqJ7l1Iy56MWB3i3Qe3sEhaMLEM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774478425; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZaZzTXMztz4BsrTjEetn5WiYeq1UcdFaHBBkV9D77uw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JORF+hsQjv26uktUJKq4jm+6dVNCnKSgpYy91tP/BqXVKxJPYdLd/av/FkksYaNDpCzpzRI+uy7B6j/RPm0d4jX77m39ranWRJLI+bt6eQD3yKeQ8lSFJUSMv3TUKISXzopOgjZYXvDGZs+uP7JSunTSFiEZQQe+EI6HQRYXVRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=KF/z/bkj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KF/z/bkj" Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48374014a77so4250285e9.3 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:40:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1774478422; x=1775083222; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=NX3VfcRobzAAPxO9qiWCisTs8vMckyJXXZiebELxbNI=; b=KF/z/bkjpjUHw64U3XS+R73TuCv+VhuISeiZNyWCXuvwekFlYSOpJ0rfGo/l9bdSWI 5vwDZAdMcNnputxdNrUTG6pEKKCJBD4Cvy6qJXCmz7ZBWy27atDhqfyVerDQBwKn7jZ2 nNUMIOlGseveQBvXrSHJlYCyjmlV2SD7kE+ShvizP3t75rgnteyT3sSbM1NqqXr5WewA dxW9nMz3lpOKDPU764Sr5WqUUcMDOX2OczbDnqm16lCyaukE60XpiHrb7ck2EIxi7xUu IIhnrWT9icYMgLpeUsnrynAP3bnxRrj7kxAclWHznlnI0RcahBK90cObpnqNaD7HtygV QUkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1774478422; x=1775083222; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=NX3VfcRobzAAPxO9qiWCisTs8vMckyJXXZiebELxbNI=; b=AA7TMxXRov77HFhzuUo4uLogyc20TiFF8wpvt6IBRQHySyCXYeUiFi0iSmxrWdwfS2 tgYhD7kUgWojA+qgC6z2PeIX+WqcgRHnvjchjqaNMaga0Rnue/nFuHQQNZwHF3mRwGPX n5UcNVbICp1nST1GryTeYAaObP1u/YNOuLLdEVXBHi8NnTka/pvfX7CRzjhK3xL4QYzy htN2iPjJxujY0iLx+ZBY2xUSeNGlIrny2GCDFKnbRsibQjZ0sEjXGcsCzZ6aMLhbuykH YQqQXO6wMxFYFMDtOVE7UAh032Qwdtjnm2nBJq6Hkm/VO/5QYaush0endaeGFRNfboeS 6hJw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVOQEotToWrZ8x8Fsfb8isNQhDaLJQ2pQIQakPgUfeyiTkuCnjmiZ6Bfn4ot8XobN+sy9xuIcChm+E=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxfU+z4kNabagMxbrb5i5SW8FHg0p9UipCUyw+voBoEuvSfDXaH 8uH3iJxYWDhDsYf4DqTGJHcpR7RMHXQbs61IugROqenJ8v+udtbeqBBE X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzwyJa3tqoR+aSW1Acn00hr0oRqsQ4RK7af1V1ASYlQ2zo4VQGI5UMR0rIVAiXZ mWCIVx4A1l1ISkAsWHtpJx9Q3ggJoLUJ07TKRIT2qciLfqoAWC++s3ATOugOjYdgt7tln88VtZb OA4q2M8TO7ig/f/4w4phnRd68KjLT0tCR3YwLpfDTH5f3PFIdXoPMNXLkomHDyzsHI2RiQtmgYP Cml+4Tk4WMu8twhFp0J1er2MmvNHQnM7C++F1jUj8pp8kSTo3u7mri/DmHjBl4VnwhzzKKq81Qc 1fOgQRGHABu+83bw8mb8eRTVheGk8QRbCdh/txeY83R2o9hwy+5wb/osAap5h2Bydfs7kGcrDwW sqzVxUaUNgeNgGp5VovDhu7kWHTCHWOkbchzxAs6KzS9eGs7nWv0dn/yk+KI2jAHigKYdLM8Qoa CbPDpxfzf+wZLZjVDzYpzXs22DNbliDA3FDHHIPysZIdEx/gVe1uU2thN5iEuX1CYD X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:34ca:b0:485:3a27:a960 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48715f0369fmr78201225e9.0.1774478421934; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-487208ca5b0sm5779385e9.2.2026.03.25.15.40.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Mar 2026 15:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 22:40:18 +0000 From: David Laight To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Pawan Gupta , x86@kernel.org, Jon Kohler , Nikolay Borisov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , David Kaplan , Sean Christopherson , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , KP Singh , Jiri Olsa , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , David Ahern , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Asit Mallick , Tao Zhang , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/10] x86/bhi: Make clear_bhb_loop() effective on newer CPUs Message-ID: <20260325224018.34714c6e@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <20260325203759.GCacRHp2t8a7c4Bp6E@fat_crate.local> References: <20260324-vmscape-bhb-v8-0-68bb524b3ab9@linux.intel.com> <20260324-vmscape-bhb-v8-2-68bb524b3ab9@linux.intel.com> <20260324205930.GQacL7Mp7vwGBKX1W7@fat_crate.local> <20260324221308.7sh6afdy6r6tsf4w@desk> <20260325203759.GCacRHp2t8a7c4Bp6E@fat_crate.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:37:59 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 03:13:08PM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote: ... > > Although call to clear_bhb_loop() will be inserted at the end of the BPF > > program before it returns, I am not sure if it is safe to assume that > > trashing registers in the path clear_bhb_loop() -> __clear_bhb_loop() is > > okay? Especially, when we don't know what code compiler generated for > > clear_bhb_loop(). BPF experts would know better? > > The compiler would preserve the regs. If you write it in asm and you adhere to > the C ABI, you could preserve them too. Shouldn't be too many. The BPF code that calls it doesn't use the C ABI - it just puts a call instruction in the code it generates. Hence all registers must be preserved. David > > Thx. > >