From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C88285CBA; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774972510; cv=none; b=pvuUbzp26Mnd2sKClvPuY+T7m//Nk2a+OOWSbCoQqvEF0CdsnF3fXLTElQcc4ZSo09mwosvTdVfNNpItaODA5by4sBByBVRV2hh3BsSBH6DaEv8Fe5DCWlTWPYD9kzvw5dQdMqw0z98qMJ3IaDfBaFHDXFUth9pEcGFx8DowYLU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774972510; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aDprB0j2xJvFThcBl3Af0grhX/iIzs5DFB/VWB2U/7o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gNNGkCHbHlNG7YauSlK4LpugXAPzebPXaoWKakQHKiY8Myt8cs5qIQ7yDjKFn3EoWoQQPgXpI1XfK8WDCShzEPyXT3H3l8ODdJKFgE/2Jf1cmE2G+EzGL6ZAfLsN8cfVfDVicnFKhBdg2mNrFjRNfdlrh2DBoQYt3YHKJNkg7x0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=smEqOJma; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="smEqOJma" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BCB7C19423; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:55:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774972509; bh=aDprB0j2xJvFThcBl3Af0grhX/iIzs5DFB/VWB2U/7o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=smEqOJma4I5FxSVuk1qKqNI84owp9C38/avG+tPtkBmAtprNzYCdqS/r2O8esNOXg S7ZUAnTOcU9x7n3y35chh7HeEXf3o9k0YxpGYBLBNDXdm9abb5mmbMNsobZPYr62B7 U1e+C0O6aWIT81qlzRRrb9VewH7+5oVJ40ff4ET8NwyNt2BBSQwcDwh775CFLrA8wM CmFcMeZrjj5W3rtzzaVUpGgnk1ONnohgiLnJVI6zUksTnSlXm5z4hxxvJrBrFrkLvQ ZD60YjKOcD8yNOEXL/WQKcD0+CFDXy8XxPVZMnZUIoTRkDH0FS46KqS18IpBqFGi0Y nRYPgg5zLzi6Q== From: SeongJae Park To: "Theodore Tso" Cc: SeongJae Park , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , "Liam R. Howlett" , "# 5 . 19 . x" , David Hildenbrand , Jonathan Corbet , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Shuah Khan , Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , damon@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: (sashiko status) [PATCH 0/2] Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon: warn commit_inputs vs other params race Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:55:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20260331155507.79720-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260331121943.GA74409@macsyma-wired.lan> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:19:43 -0400 "Theodore Tso" wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 02:22:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I view Sashiko as primarily an author tool. Sometimes I call it > > checkpatch++. In a better world, author would be able to sort out > > Sashiko issues before ever sending out the patchset. But in this > > world, a public send is needed to obtain that review. > > Note that Sashiko is fully open source and the prompts are available > in third_party/prompts in the git repo: > > https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko > > So people can run it privately, although they will need to provide > their own LLM credits. That's unfortunately a barrier to some people. To me, what makes sashiko special and different from other AI review tools is the fact that it is automatically reviewing nearly every kernel patch for free and publicly sharing the results. Thanks, SJ [...]