From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] doc: Add CPU Isolation documentation
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2026 13:01:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260402110122.2gkDqQ7Q@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402094749.18879-1-frederic@kernel.org>
On 2026-04-02 11:47:49 [+0200], Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> nohz_full was introduced in v3.10 in 2013, which means this
> documentation is overdue for 13 years.
>
> Fortunately Paul wrote a part of the needed documentation a while ago,
> especially concerning nohz_full in Documentation/timers/no_hz.rst and
> also about per-CPU kthreads in
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-per-CPU-kthreads.rst
>
> Introduce a new page that gives an overview of CPU isolation in general.
>
> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
This documents also isolcpus= boot argument. The only thing that this
argument does and runtime can not do is the managed_irq sub argument.
This sub argument is a story of its own and it is of quite limited for
me taste.
However, isolcpus= is marked as deprecated. I suggest to remove the
"Deprecated - use cpusets instead" note as the static configuration is
fine if the system is partitioned once never changed within its
lifetime.
Are there any objections and if so why needs this boot argument be
removed (assuming we have a runtime equivalent knob for managed_irq)?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 9:47 [PATCH v3] doc: Add CPU Isolation documentation Frederic Weisbecker
2026-04-02 11:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-04-03 12:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-04-02 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260402110122.2gkDqQ7Q@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox