From: Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
David Gow <david@davidgow.net>, Rae Moar <raemoar63@gmail.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
"Alessandro Carminati" <acarmina@redhat.com>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Albert Esteve" <aesteve@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Functional Testing" <lkft@linaro.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>, "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"David Gow" <david@davidgow.net>
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/5] kunit: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:28:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420-kunit_add_support-v7-0-e8bc6e0f70de@redhat.com> (raw)
Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
Such intentionally generated warning backtraces are neither desirable
nor useful for a number of reasons:
- They can result in overlooked real problems.
- A warning that suddenly starts to show up in unit tests needs to be
investigated and has to be marked to be ignored, for example by
adjusting filter scripts. Such filters are ad hoc because there is
no real standard format for warnings. On top of that, such filter
scripts would require constant maintenance.
One option to address the problem would be to add messages such as
"expected warning backtraces start/end here" to the kernel log.
However, that would again require filter scripts, might result in
missing real problematic warning backtraces triggered while the test
is running, and the irrelevant backtrace(s) would still clog the
kernel log.
Solve the problem by providing a means to identify and suppress specific
warning backtraces while executing test code. Support suppressing multiple
backtraces while at the same time limiting changes to generic code to the
absolute minimum.
Overview:
Patch#1 Introduces the suppression infrastructure.
Patch#2 Mitigates the impact of suppression.
Patch#3 Adds selftests to validate the functionality.
Patch#4 Demonstrates real-world usage in the DRM subsystem.
Patch#5 Documents the new API and usage guidelines.
Design Notes:
The objective is to suppress unwanted WARN*() generated messages.
Although most major architectures share common bug handling via `lib/bug.c`
and `report_bug()`, some minor or legacy architectures still rely on their
own platform-specific handling. This divergence must be considered in any
such feature. Additionally, a key challenge in implementing this feature is
the fragmentation of `WARN*()` message emission: part of the output is
produced in the macro itself (via __warn_printk()), and part in the exception
handler.
Lessons from the Previous Attempt:
In earlier iterations, suppression logic was added inside the
`__report_bug()` function to intercept WARN*() output. To implement the
check in the bug handler code, two strategies were considered:
* Strategy #1: Use `kallsyms` to infer the originating function. This
approach proved unreliable due to compiler-induced transformations
such as inlining, cloning, and code fragmentation.
* Strategy #2: Store function name `__func__` in `struct bug_entry` in
the `__bug_table`. However, `__func__` is a compiler-generated symbol,
which complicates relocation and linking in position-independent code.
Additionally, architectures not using the unified `BUG()` path would
still require ad-hoc handling.
A per-macro solution was also attempted (v5-v6), injecting checks
directly into the `WARN*()` macros in `include/asm-generic/bug.h`.
While this offered full control, it required modifying the generic
bug header and was considered too invasive and damaging the critical
path, and thus incorrect [1].
Current Proposal: Check in `warn_slowpath_fmt()` and `__report_bug()`.
Suppression is checked at two points in the warning path:
- In `warn_slowpath_fmt()` (kernel/panic.c), for architectures without
__WARN_FLAGS. The check runs before any output, fully suppressing
both message and backtrace.
- In `__report_bug()` (lib/bug.c), for architectures that define
__WARN_FLAGS. The check runs before `__warn()` is called, suppressing
the backtrace and stack dump. On this path, the `WARN()` format message
may still appear in the kernel log since `__warn_printk()` executes
before the trap.
This approach avoids modifying include/asm-generic/bug.h entirely,
requires no architecture-specific code, and limits changes to generic
code to the absolute minimum.
A helper function, `__kunit_is_suppressed_warning()`, walks an RCU-
protected list of active suppressions, matching by current task. The
suppression state is dynamically allocated via kunit_kzalloc() and
tied to the KUnit test lifecycle via kunit_add_action(), ensuring
automatic cleanup at test exit.
To minimize runtime impact when no suppressions are active, an atomic
counter tracks the number of active suppressions.
`__kunit_is_suppressed_warning()` checks this counter first and returns
immediately when it is zero, avoiding the RCU-protected list traversal
in the common case.
This series is based on the RFC patch and subsequent discussion at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kselftest/patch/02546e59-1afe-4b08-ba81-d94f3b691c9a@moroto.mountain/
and offers a more comprehensive solution of the problem discussed there.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGegRW76X8Fk_5qqOBw_aqBwAkQTsc8kXKHEuu9ECeXzdJwMSw@mail.gmail.com/
Changes since RFC:
- Introduced CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE
- Minor cleanups and bug fixes
- Added support for all affected architectures
- Added support for counting suppressed warnings
- Added unit tests using those counters
- Added patch to suppress warning backtraces in dev_addr_lists tests
Changes since v1:
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
[I retained those tags since there have been no functional changes]
- Introduced KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE configuration option, enabled by
default.
Changes since v2:
- Rebased to v6.9-rc2
- Added comments to drm warning suppression explaining why it is needed.
- Added patch to move conditional code in arch/sh/include/asm/bug.h
to avoid kerneldoc warning
- Added architecture maintainers to Cc: for architecture specific patches
- No functional changes
Changes since v3:
- Rebased to v6.14-rc6
- Dropped net: "kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests"
since 3db3b62955cd6d73afde05a17d7e8e106695c3b9
- Added __kunit_ and KUNIT_ prefixes.
- Tested on interessed architectures.
Changes since v4:
- Rebased to v6.15-rc7
- Dropped all code in __report_bug()
- Moved all checks in WARN*() macros.
- Dropped all architecture specific code.
- Made __kunit_is_suppressed_warning nice to noinstr functions.
Changes since v5:
- Rebased to v7.0-rc3
- Added RCU protection for the suppressed warnings list.
- Added static key and branching optimization.
- Removed custom `strcmp` implementation and reworked
__kunit_is_suppressed_warning() entrypoint function.
Changes since v6:
- Moved suppression checks from WARN*() macros to warn_slowpath_fmt()
and __report_bug().
- Replaced stack-allocated suppression struct with kunit_kzalloc() heap
allocation tied to the KUnit test lifecycle.
- Changed suppression strategy from function-name matching to task-scoped:
all warnings on the current task are suppressed between START and END,
rather than only warnings originating from a specific named function.
- Simplified macro API: removed KUNIT_DECLARE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(),
the START macro now takes (test) and handles allocation internally.
- Removed static key and branching optiomization, as by the time it
was executed, callers are already in warn slowpaths.
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260317-kunit_add_support-v6-0-dd22aeb3fe5d@redhat.com
Alessandro Carminati (2):
bug/kunit: Core support for suppressing warning backtraces
bug/kunit: Suppressing warning backtraces reduced impact on WARN*()
sites
Guenter Roeck (3):
Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.
drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests
kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 30 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 16 ++++
include/asm-generic/bug.h | 48 +++++++----
include/kunit/bug.h | 62 ++++++++++++++
include/kunit/test.h | 1 +
lib/kunit/Kconfig | 9 ++
lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 +-
lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/kunit/bug.c | 54 ++++++++++++
9 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/kunit/bug.h
create mode 100644 lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
create mode 100644 lib/kunit/bug.c
--
2.34.1
---
Alessandro Carminati (2):
bug/kunit: Core support for suppressing warning backtraces
bug/kunit: Reduce runtime impact of warning backtrace suppression
Guenter Roeck (3):
kunit: Add backtrace suppression self-tests
drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests
kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 30 ++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 14 +++++
include/kunit/bug.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++
include/kunit/test.h | 1 +
kernel/panic.c | 8 ++-
lib/bug.c | 8 +++
lib/kunit/Kconfig | 9 ++++
lib/kunit/Makefile | 9 +++-
lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/kunit/bug.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 80234b5ab240f52fa45d201e899e207b9265ef91
change-id: 20260312-kunit_add_support-2f35806b19dd
Best regards,
--
Albert Esteve <aesteve@redhat.com>
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 12:28 Albert Esteve [this message]
2026-04-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] bug/kunit: Core support for suppressing warning backtraces Albert Esteve
2026-04-20 14:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 8:22 ` Albert Esteve
2026-04-20 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 8:29 ` Albert Esteve
2026-04-22 12:19 ` David Gow
2026-04-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] bug/kunit: Reduce runtime impact of warning backtrace suppression Albert Esteve
2026-04-20 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 8:41 ` Albert Esteve
2026-04-22 12:19 ` David Gow
2026-04-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] kunit: Add backtrace suppression self-tests Albert Esteve
2026-04-22 12:20 ` David Gow
2026-04-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests Albert Esteve
2026-04-20 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-21 8:49 ` Albert Esteve
2026-04-21 11:50 ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-22 12:20 ` David Gow
2026-04-20 12:28 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API Albert Esteve
2026-04-22 12:20 ` David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260420-kunit_add_support-v7-0-e8bc6e0f70de@redhat.com \
--to=aesteve@redhat.com \
--cc=acarmina@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david@davidgow.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raemoar63@gmail.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox