From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
tzungbi@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/9] revocable: Add KUnit test cases
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:58:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260427135841.96266-3-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427135841.96266-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>
Add KUnit test cases for the revocable API.
The test cases cover the following scenarios:
- Basic: Verifies that a consumer can successfully access the resource.
- Revocation: Verifies that after the provider revokes the resource,
the consumer correctly receives a NULL pointer on a subsequent access.
- Try Access Macro: Same as "Revocation" but uses the macro level
helpers.
- Concurrent Access: Verifies multiple threads can access the resource.
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v9:
- Add test cases for embedded resource provider.
v8: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260213092307.858908-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- Squash:
- c259cd7ea3c9 revocable: fix missing module license and description
- a243f7fb11fe revocable: Add KUnit test for provider lifetime races
- 988357628c2c revocable: Add KUnit test for concurrent access
- Change accordingly due to its dependency "revocable: Revocable resource
management" changes.
v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116080235.350305-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- "2025" -> "2026" in copyright.
- Rename the test name "macro" -> "try_access_macro".
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251106152330.11733-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- Rename REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH() -> REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_SCOPED().
- Add tests for new REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH().
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251016054204.1523139-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250923075302.591026-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- REVOCABLE() -> REVOCABLE_TRY_ACCESS_WITH().
- revocable_release() -> revocable_withdraw_access().
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250912081718.3827390-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250820081645.847919-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- New in the series.
A way to run the test:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST=y \
revocable_test
Or
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_KASAN=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK=y \
--kconfig_add CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT="10" \
--arch=x86_64 \
--make_options="C=1 W=1" \
revocable_test
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
drivers/base/Kconfig | 5 +
drivers/base/Makefile | 3 +
drivers/base/revocable_test.c | 461 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 470 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/base/revocable_test.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 6ec3a7cb5e6b..14aa035ef431 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -22831,6 +22831,7 @@ L: driver-core@lists.linux.dev
S: Maintained
T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git
F: drivers/base/revocable.c
+F: drivers/base/revocable_test.c
F: include/linux/revocable.h
RFKILL
diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index f7d385cbd3ba..921f7e812ba5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -259,3 +259,8 @@ config FW_DEVLINK_SYNC_STATE_TIMEOUT
work on.
endmenu
+
+config REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST
+ tristate "KUnit tests for revocable" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
diff --git a/drivers/base/Makefile b/drivers/base/Makefile
index bdf854694e39..5fd19abbc83e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/base/Makefile
@@ -35,3 +35,6 @@ ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_DRIVER) := -DDEBUG
# define_trace.h needs to know how to find our header
CFLAGS_trace.o := -I$(src)
obj-$(CONFIG_TRACING) += trace.o
+
+# KUnit test cases
+obj-$(CONFIG_REVOCABLE_KUNIT_TEST) += revocable_test.o
diff --git a/drivers/base/revocable_test.c b/drivers/base/revocable_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bdab05dfafda
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/base/revocable_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,461 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright 2026 Google LLC
+ *
+ * KUnit tests for the revocable API.
+ *
+ * The test cases cover the following scenarios:
+ *
+ * - Basic: Verifies that a consumer can successfully access the resource.
+ *
+ * - Revocation: Verifies that after the provider revokes the resource,
+ * the consumer correctly receives a NULL pointer on a subsequent access.
+ *
+ * - Try Access Macro: Same as "Revocation" but uses the macro level
+ * helpers.
+ *
+ * - Concurrent Access: Verifies multiple threads can access the resource.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
+#include <linux/revocable.h>
+
+static int get_refcount(struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ return refcount_read(&rev->kref.refcount);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ struct revocable_consumer rc;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ revocable_init(rev, &rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ revocable_deinit(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_embed_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable rev;
+ struct revocable_consumer rc;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+ revocable_embed_init(&rev, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev.alloc_type, REVOCABLE_EMBEDDED);
+
+ revocable_init(&rev, &rc);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ revocable_embed_destroy(&rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_revocation(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ struct revocable_consumer rc;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ revocable_init(rev, &rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ revocable_deinit(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_embed_test_revocation(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable rev;
+ struct revocable_consumer rc;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+ revocable_embed_init(&rev, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev.alloc_type, REVOCABLE_EMBEDDED);
+
+ revocable_init(&rev, &rc);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ revocable_revoke(&rev);
+
+ res = revocable_try_access(&rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&rc);
+
+ revocable_embed_destroy(&rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_try_access_macro1(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ {
+ revocable_try_access_with(rev, res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ {
+ revocable_try_access_with(rev, res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static int call_revocable_try_access_or_return_err(struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return_err(rev, res, -ENXIO);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int call_revocable_try_access_or_return(struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return(rev, res);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void call_revocable_try_access_or_return_void(struct kunit *test,
+ struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return_void(rev, res);
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "unreachable");
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_try_access_macro2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+ int ret;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ {
+ revocable_try_access_with(rev, res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ ret = call_revocable_try_access_or_return_err(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ENXIO);
+
+ ret = call_revocable_try_access_or_return(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ENODEV);
+
+ call_revocable_try_access_or_return_void(test, rev);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_try_access_macro3(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+ bool accessed;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ accessed = false;
+ revocable_try_access_with_scoped(rev, res) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ accessed = true;
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, accessed);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ accessed = false;
+ revocable_try_access_with_scoped(rev, res) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ accessed = true;
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, accessed);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static int call_revocable_try_access_or_return_err_scoped(struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return_err_scoped(rev, res, -ENXIO) {}
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int call_revocable_try_access_or_return_scoped(struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return_scoped(rev, res) {}
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void call_revocable_try_access_or_return_void_scoped(struct kunit *test,
+ struct revocable *rev)
+{
+ void *res;
+
+ revocable_try_access_or_return_void_scoped(rev, res) {}
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "unreachable");
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_try_access_macro4(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678, *res;
+ bool accessed;
+ int ret;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ accessed = false;
+ revocable_try_access_with_scoped(rev, res) {
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res, real_res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 3);
+ accessed = true;
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, accessed);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+
+ revocable_revoke(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ ret = call_revocable_try_access_or_return_err_scoped(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ENXIO);
+
+ ret = call_revocable_try_access_or_return_scoped(rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -ENODEV);
+
+ call_revocable_try_access_or_return_void_scoped(test, rev);
+
+ accessed = false;
+ revocable_try_access_or_skip_scoped(rev, res)
+ accessed = true;
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, accessed);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+struct test_concurrent_access_context {
+ struct completion started, enter;
+ struct task_struct *thread;
+
+ union {
+ /* Used by test provider. */
+ struct revocable *rev;
+
+ /* Used by test consumer. */
+ struct {
+ struct completion exit;
+ struct revocable_consumer rc;
+ struct kunit *test;
+ void *expected_res;
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+static int test_concurrent_access_provider(void *data)
+{
+ struct test_concurrent_access_context *ctx = data;
+
+ complete(&ctx->started);
+
+ wait_for_completion(&ctx->enter);
+ revocable_revoke(ctx->rev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int test_concurrent_access_consumer(void *data)
+{
+ struct test_concurrent_access_context *ctx = data;
+ void *res;
+
+ complete(&ctx->started);
+
+ wait_for_completion(&ctx->enter);
+ res = revocable_try_access(&ctx->rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(ctx->test, res, ctx->expected_res);
+
+ wait_for_completion(&ctx->exit);
+ revocable_withdraw_access(&ctx->rc);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void revocable_test_concurrent_access(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct revocable *rev;
+ void *real_res = (void *)0x12345678;
+ struct test_concurrent_access_context *ctx;
+ int i;
+
+ rev = revocable_alloc(real_res);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, rev);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, rev->alloc_type, REVOCABLE_DYNAMIC);
+
+ ctx = kunit_kmalloc_array(test, 3, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ctx);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+ ctx[i].test = test;
+ init_completion(&ctx[i].started);
+ init_completion(&ctx[i].enter);
+
+ if (i == 0) {
+ /* Transfer the ownership of provider reference too. */
+ ctx[i].rev = rev;
+ ctx[i].thread = kthread_run(
+ test_concurrent_access_provider, ctx + i,
+ "revocable_%d", i);
+ } else {
+ init_completion(&ctx[i].exit);
+ revocable_init(rev, &ctx[i].rc);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 2 + i);
+
+ ctx[i].thread = kthread_run(
+ test_concurrent_access_consumer, ctx + i,
+ "revocable_consumer_%d", i);
+ }
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(ctx[i].thread));
+
+ wait_for_completion(&ctx[i].started);
+ }
+
+ ctx[1].expected_res = real_res;
+ /* consumer1 enters read-side critical section. */
+ complete(&ctx[1].enter);
+ msleep(100);
+
+ /* provider0 revokes the resource. */
+ complete(&ctx[0].enter);
+ msleep(100);
+ /* provider0 can't exit. It's waiting for the grace period. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 4);
+
+ ctx[2].expected_res = NULL;
+ /* consumer2 enters read-side critical section. */
+ complete(&ctx[2].enter);
+ msleep(100);
+
+ /* consumer{1,2} exit read-side critical section. */
+ for (i = 1; i < 3; ++i) {
+ complete(&ctx[i].exit);
+ kthread_stop(ctx[i].thread);
+ revocable_deinit(&ctx[i].rc);
+ }
+
+ kthread_stop(ctx[0].thread);
+ /* provider0 exits as all readers exit their critical section. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_refcount(rev), 1);
+
+ /* Drop the caller reference. */
+ revocable_put(rev);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case revocable_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_embed_test_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_revocation),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_embed_test_revocation),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_try_access_macro1),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_try_access_macro2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_try_access_macro3),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_try_access_macro4),
+ KUNIT_CASE(revocable_test_concurrent_access),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite revocable_test_suite = {
+ .name = "revocable_test",
+ .test_cases = revocable_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(revocable_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit tests for the revocable API");
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 13:58 [PATCH v9 0/9] drivers/base: Introduce revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] revocable: Revocable resource management Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] platform/chrome: Protect cros_ec_device lifecycle with revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-04-27 13:58 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Consume cros_ec_device via revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260427135841.96266-3-tzungbi@kernel.org \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox