From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF62B37AA63; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781120572; cv=none; b=R3arl2WNJvHIH/66TVIsRVS0cT8uBJtpsH6n7QlAZ4kMYqcg6jWRdvIXn9MPf4+rVNeDSAsKIDBthN4QeVr8zA/so2tfmlCpYV+G9GNSGNi+ZAJiTGaJkfOp+VhtWBFOiDelEleAM26zswgx7KnmIE4dT85/BBwbxYxsEkNXrsY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781120572; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dP4HXRIDYUSR15Nwgds/5wXJm0luZvRegrcYrhnfNy4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GQJI0LpCrbxOle+9y/vFprujbp243yRF/zoHtad6bACAqabW7rO3L7JA3YrGRHC1YL1FzlzUWGnbZ4v4QBOF0DcWiDyTQC6prbnog3LHCE37zrAy8SJs+K0kYLuqSTKbK0LzdYtBWcZoDGXj7B0gw94PPiph47Jt9DZMZkY31y0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dsgeVa7B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dsgeVa7B" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781120572; x=1812656572; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dP4HXRIDYUSR15Nwgds/5wXJm0luZvRegrcYrhnfNy4=; b=dsgeVa7Bkc0R/SJuoEpX7xkdwwIvOupnbyYT+Wi/AohkLjQLg+wb7Dfm /RghFr2p3GPDgzVVCYkZ/T+ZjAN2MDi+veStU5o//qHcGgxwrQIWjfqIS CUlxag0gdlCxsjfA1o8Uxh/mROv9hkZ2iCy1M/Mn44d0lXNkNSczyS7SE 7lJMmnGml6feyXJ+jAp1zLXsUcDzcXEtj3hiGfZmLMjaYqvdjv/DNpi3A E/28KmTd1VV7BJ5V8M2RQxSR3D1h+7pnZBwzqg0ny5ULavjgizD8hesAJ sRbxJ6vuHtvlObmfsCvoK+E/3Ah+ZBmz223r+9CovfRv4XXjO2f3DW0Fk Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zwmn+M41Rf+MFVgh7xXd1A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bUjZ8fNQREWHooOo0dro6w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11813"; a="92243801" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,197,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="92243801" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jun 2026 12:42:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 3jQBOfo8Styw2yrTc2+UuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: h4L2fMvHR8umsHN+MGctDw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,197,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="241847089" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f0d55cb201f0) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2026 12:42:48 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f0d55cb201f0 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wXOp3-00000000Lq2-2zVn; Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:42:45 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:42:24 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Abhishek Bapat , Suren Baghdasaryan , Andrew Morton , Kent Overstreet , Hao Ge Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List , Shuah Khan , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sourav Panda , Abhishek Bapat Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: extend the allocinfo ioctl kselftest Message-ID: <202606110300.R4LPBVBO-lkp@intel.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Suren, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test ERROR on next-20260609] [cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable shuah-kselftest/next shuah-kselftest/fixes linus/master v7.1-rc7] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Abhishek-Bapat/alloc_tag-add-ioctl-to-proc-allocinfo/20260610-081508 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d0a8308b4d0799876d24461a8ed9b5a71d3e1e89.1781042698.git.abhishekbapat%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] kselftest: alloc_tag: extend the allocinfo ioctl kselftest config: sparc64-randconfig-r061-20260610 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260611/202606110300.R4LPBVBO-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260611/202606110300.R4LPBVBO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606110300.R4LPBVBO-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): lib/alloc_tag.c: In function 'allocinfo_compat_ioctl': >> lib/alloc_tag.c:346:58: error: implicit declaration of function 'compat_ptr' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 346 | return allocinfo_ioctl(file, cmd, (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg)); | ^~~~~~~~~~ vim +/compat_ptr +346 lib/alloc_tag.c 341 342 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT 343 static long allocinfo_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, 344 unsigned long arg) 345 { > 346 return allocinfo_ioctl(file, cmd, (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg)); 347 } 348 #endif 349 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki