From: Jack Thomson <jackabt.amazon@gmail.com>
To: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/5] KVM: selftests: Enable pre_fault_memory_test for arm64
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:23:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612162354.73378-4-jackabt.amazon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612162354.73378-1-jackabt.amazon@gmail.com>
From: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
Enable the pre_fault_memory_test to run on arm64 by making it work with
different guest page sizes and testing multiple guest configurations.
Update the test_assert to compare against the UCALL_EXIT_REASON, for
portability, as arm64 exits with KVM_EXIT_MMIO while x86 uses
KVM_EXIT_IO.
Signed-off-by: Jack Thomson <jackabt@amazon.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
.../selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c | 115 ++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index 9118a5a51b89..4609d8f23e38 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += guest_memfd_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += mmu_stress_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += rseq_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += steal_time
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_arm64 += pre_fault_memory_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 = $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_COMMON)
TEST_GEN_PROGS_s390 += s390/memop
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
index fcb57fd034e6..9f5f0d1a5db1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/pre_fault_memory_test.c
@@ -11,19 +11,29 @@
#include <kvm_util.h>
#include <processor.h>
#include <pthread.h>
+#include <guest_modes.h>
/* Arbitrarily chosen values */
-#define TEST_SIZE (SZ_2M + PAGE_SIZE)
-#define TEST_NPAGES (TEST_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
+#define TEST_BASE_SIZE SZ_2M
#define TEST_SLOT 10
+/* Storage of test info to share with guest code */
+struct test_config {
+ u64 page_size;
+ u64 test_size;
+ u64 test_num_pages;
+};
+
+static struct test_config test_config;
+
static void guest_code(u64 base_gva)
{
volatile u64 val __used;
+ struct test_config *config = &test_config;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < TEST_NPAGES; i++) {
- u64 *src = (u64 *)(base_gva + i * PAGE_SIZE);
+ for (i = 0; i < config->test_num_pages; i++) {
+ u64 *src = (u64 *)(base_gva + i * config->page_size);
val = *src;
}
@@ -56,7 +66,7 @@ static void *delete_slot_worker(void *__data)
cpu_relax();
vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, data->gpa,
- TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES, data->flags);
+ TEST_SLOT, test_config.test_num_pages, data->flags);
return NULL;
}
@@ -149,8 +159,8 @@ static void pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 base_gpa, u64 offset,
/*
* Assert success if prefaulting the entire range should succeed, i.e.
* complete with no bytes remaining. Otherwise prefaulting should have
- * failed due to ENOENT (due to RET_PF_EMULATE for emulated MMIO when
- * no memslot exists).
+ * failed due to ENOENT (no memslot exists for the GPA; on x86 this
+ * surfaces via RET_PF_EMULATE).
*/
if (!expected_left)
TEST_ASSERT_VM_VCPU_IOCTL(!ret, KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY, ret, vcpu->vm);
@@ -159,43 +169,70 @@ static void pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 base_gpa, u64 offset,
KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY, ret, vcpu->vm);
}
-static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
+struct test_params {
+ unsigned long vm_type;
+ bool private;
+};
+
+static void __test_pre_fault_memory(enum vm_guest_mode guest_mode, void *arg)
{
- gpa_t gpa, gva, alignment, guest_page_size;
+ gpa_t gpa, gva, alignment, guest_page_size, host_page_size;
+ struct test_params *p = arg;
const struct vm_shape shape = {
- .mode = VM_MODE_DEFAULT,
- .type = vm_type,
+ .mode = guest_mode,
+ .type = p->vm_type,
};
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_run *run;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
+ pr_info("Testing guest mode: %s\n", vm_guest_mode_string(guest_mode));
+
vm = vm_create_shape_with_one_vcpu(shape, &vcpu, guest_code);
- alignment = guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[VM_MODE_DEFAULT].page_size;
- gpa = (vm->max_gfn - TEST_NPAGES) * guest_page_size;
+ guest_page_size = vm_guest_mode_params[guest_mode].page_size;
+ host_page_size = getpagesize();
+
+ test_config.page_size = guest_page_size;
+ test_config.test_size = align_up(TEST_BASE_SIZE + test_config.page_size,
+ host_page_size);
+ test_config.test_num_pages = vm_calc_num_guest_pages(vm->mode, test_config.test_size);
+
+ gpa = (vm->max_gfn - test_config.test_num_pages) * test_config.page_size;
alignment = SZ_2M;
+ alignment = max(alignment, host_page_size);
gpa = align_down(gpa, alignment);
gva = gpa & ((1ULL << (vm->va_bits - 1)) - 1);
- vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, gpa, TEST_SLOT,
- TEST_NPAGES, private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
- virt_map(vm, gva, gpa, TEST_NPAGES);
+ vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
+ gpa, TEST_SLOT, test_config.test_num_pages,
+ p->private ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
+ virt_map(vm, gva, gpa, test_config.test_num_pages);
- if (private)
- vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, TEST_SIZE);
+ if (p->private)
+ vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, test_config.test_size);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, SZ_2M, 0, private);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE, private);
- pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, test_config.test_size, 0, p->private);
+ /* Retry the same range after the first prefault attempt. */
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, 0, test_config.test_size, 0, p->private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa,
+ test_config.test_size - host_page_size,
+ host_page_size * 2, host_page_size, p->private);
+ pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, test_config.test_size,
+ host_page_size, host_page_size, p->private);
vcpu_args_set(vcpu, 1, gva);
+
+ /* Export the shared variables to the guest. */
+ sync_global_to_guest(vm, test_config);
+
vcpu_run(vcpu);
run = vcpu->run;
- TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO,
- "Wanted KVM_EXIT_IO, got exit reason: %u (%s)",
+ TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == UCALL_EXIT_REASON,
+ "Wanted %s, got exit reason: %u (%s)",
+ exit_reason_str(UCALL_EXIT_REASON),
run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
@@ -214,16 +251,46 @@ static void __test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
static void test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
{
+ struct test_params p = {
+ .vm_type = vm_type,
+ .private = private,
+ };
+
if (vm_type && !(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(vm_type))) {
pr_info("Skipping tests for vm_type 0x%lx\n", vm_type);
return;
}
- __test_pre_fault_memory(vm_type, private);
+ for_each_guest_mode(__test_pre_fault_memory, &p);
+}
+
+static void help(char *name)
+{
+ puts("");
+ printf("usage: %s [-h] [-m mode]\n", name);
+ puts("");
+ guest_modes_help();
+ puts("");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
+ int opt;
+
+ guest_modes_append_default();
+
+ while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hm:")) != -1) {
+ switch (opt) {
+ case 'm':
+ guest_modes_cmdline(optarg);
+ break;
+ case 'h':
+ default:
+ help(argv[0]);
+ exit(0);
+ }
+ }
+
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY));
test_pre_fault_memory(0, false);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 16:23 [PATCH v5 0/5] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY support Jack Thomson
2026-06-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] KVM: arm64: Pass walk flags to kvm_pgtable_get_leaf() Jack Thomson
2026-06-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add pre_fault_memory implementation Jack Thomson
2026-06-12 16:23 ` Jack Thomson [this message]
2026-06-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add option for different backing in pre-fault tests Jack Thomson
2026-06-12 16:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] KVM: selftests: Add nested pre-fault test for arm64 Jack Thomson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612162354.73378-4-jackabt.amazon@gmail.com \
--to=jackabt.amazon@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jackabt@amazon.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox