[PATCH v4 1/5] rpmsg: virtio_rpmsg_bus: rename rbufs and sbufs

[Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>]

rename variables with clear names.
%s/rbufs/rx_bufs/
%s/sbufs/tx_bufs/
%s/last_sbuf/last_tx_buf/

Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@amd.com>
---
 drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
index 5ae15111fb4f..773547479d15 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@
  * @vdev:	the virtio device
  * @rvq:	rx virtqueue
  * @svq:	tx virtqueue
- * @rbufs:	kernel address of rx buffers
- * @sbufs:	kernel address of tx buffers
- * @num_bufs:	total number of buffers for rx and tx
+ * @rx_bufs:	kernel address of rx buffers
+ * @tx_bufs:	kernel address of tx buffers
+ * @num_bufs:   total number of buffers for rx and tx
  * @buf_size:   size of one rx or tx buffer
- * @last_sbuf:	index of last tx buffer used
+ * @last_tx_buf: index of last tx buffer used
  * @bufs_dma:	dma base addr of the buffers
- * @tx_lock:	protects svq and sbufs, to allow concurrent senders.
+ * @tx_lock:	protects svq and tx_bufs, to allow concurrent senders.
  *		sending a message might require waking up a dozing remote
  *		processor, which involves sleeping, hence the mutex.
  * @endpoints:	idr of local endpoints, allows fast retrieval
@@ -55,10 +55,10 @@
 struct virtproc_info {
 	struct virtio_device *vdev;
 	struct virtqueue *rvq, *svq;
-	void *rbufs, *sbufs;
+	void *rx_bufs, *tx_bufs;
 	unsigned int num_bufs;
 	unsigned int buf_size;
-	int last_sbuf;
+	int last_tx_buf;
 	dma_addr_t bufs_dma;
 	struct mutex tx_lock;
 	struct idr endpoints;
@@ -444,8 +444,8 @@ static void *get_a_tx_buf(struct virtproc_info *vrp)
 	 * either pick the next unused tx buffer
 	 * (half of our buffers are used for sending messages)
 	 */
-	if (vrp->last_sbuf < vrp->num_bufs / 2)
-		ret = vrp->sbufs + vrp->buf_size * vrp->last_sbuf++;
+	if (vrp->last_tx_buf < vrp->num_bufs / 2)
+		ret = vrp->tx_bufs + vrp->buf_size * vrp->last_tx_buf++;
 	/* or recycle a used one */
 	else
 		ret = virtqueue_get_buf(vrp->svq, &len);
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static __poll_t virtio_rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp,
 	 *   allocated buffers are used for transmit, hence num_bufs / 2), or,
 	 * - we ask the virtqueue if there's a buffer available
 	 */
-	if (vrp->last_sbuf < vrp->num_bufs / 2 ||
+	if (vrp->last_tx_buf < vrp->num_bufs / 2 ||
 	    !virtqueue_enable_cb(vrp->svq))
 		mask |= EPOLLOUT;
 
@@ -873,15 +873,15 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		bufs_va, &vrp->bufs_dma);
 
 	/* half of the buffers is dedicated for RX */
-	vrp->rbufs = bufs_va;
+	vrp->rx_bufs = bufs_va;
 
 	/* and half is dedicated for TX */
-	vrp->sbufs = bufs_va + total_buf_space / 2;
+	vrp->tx_bufs = bufs_va + total_buf_space / 2;
 
 	/* set up the receive buffers */
 	for (i = 0; i < vrp->num_bufs / 2; i++) {
 		struct scatterlist sg;
-		void *cpu_addr = vrp->rbufs + i * vrp->buf_size;
+		void *cpu_addr = vrp->rx_bufs + i * vrp->buf_size;
 
 		rpmsg_sg_init(&sg, cpu_addr, vrp->buf_size);
 
@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static void rpmsg_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	vdev->config->del_vqs(vrp->vdev);
 
 	dma_free_coherent(vdev->dev.parent, total_buf_space,
-			  vrp->rbufs, vrp->bufs_dma);
+			  vrp->rx_bufs, vrp->bufs_dma);
 
 	kfree(vrp);
 }
-- 
2.34.1