From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] cgroup/cpuset: Avoid unnecessary cpus & mems update in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:04:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623230413.1984188-2-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623230413.1984188-1-longman@redhat.com>
As reported by sashiko [1], cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() may perform
unnecessary task iteration and updating of tasks' CPU and node masks
when mems_allowed and/or cpus_allowed are not set in cpuset v2. It is
due to the fact that the temporary new_cpus and new_mems masks do not
inherit parent's effective_cpus/mems when they are empty which is the
expected behavior for cpuset v2 since commit 4ec22e9c5a90 ("cpuset:
Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy").
Fix that and avoid unnecessay work by enhancing
compute_effective_cpumask() to add the empty cpumask check
and inheriting the parent's versions if empty when in v2. A new
compute_effective_nodemask() helper is also added to perform similar
function for new effective_mems.
Add new test_cpuset_prs.sh test cases to confirm that effective_cpus
will inherit the parent's version if cpuset.cpus is empty.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260621032816.1806773-1-longman%40redhat.com
Suggested-by: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Fixes: 4ec22e9c5a90 ("cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 45 +++++++++++--------
.../selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh | 11 ++++-
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index aff86acea701..044ddbf66f8e 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1094,12 +1094,35 @@ void cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpumask *new_cpus)
* @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_cpus mask
* @parent: the parent cpuset
*
+ * For v2, the parent's effective_cpus is inherited if cpumask empty.
* The result is valid only if the given cpuset isn't a partition root.
*/
static void compute_effective_cpumask(struct cpumask *new_cpus,
struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
{
- cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
+ bool has_cpus;
+
+ has_cpus = cpumask_and(new_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, parent->effective_cpus);
+ if (!has_cpus && is_in_v2_mode())
+ cpumask_copy(new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
+}
+
+/**
+ * compute_effective_nodemask - Compute the effective nodemask of the cpuset
+ * @new_cpus: the temp variable for the new effective_mems mask
+ * @cs: the cpuset the need to recompute the new effective_mems mask
+ * @parent: the parent cpuset
+ *
+ * For v2, the parent's effective_mems is inherited if nodemask empty.
+ */
+static void compute_effective_nodemask(nodemask_t *new_mems,
+ struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *parent)
+{
+ bool has_mems;
+
+ has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
+ if (!has_mems && is_in_v2_mode())
+ nodes_copy(*new_mems, parent->effective_mems);
}
/*
@@ -2148,15 +2171,6 @@ static void update_cpumasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp,
goto update_parent_effective;
}
- /*
- * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
- * parent, which is guaranteed to have some CPUs unless
- * it is a partition root that has explicitly distributed
- * out all its CPUs.
- */
- if (is_in_v2_mode() && !remote && cpumask_empty(tmp->new_cpus))
- cpumask_copy(tmp->new_cpus, parent->effective_cpus);
-
/*
* Skip the whole subtree if
* 1) the cpumask remains the same,
@@ -2704,14 +2718,7 @@ static void update_nodemasks_hier(struct cpuset *cs, nodemask_t *new_mems)
cpuset_for_each_descendant_pre(cp, pos_css, cs) {
struct cpuset *parent = parent_cs(cp);
- bool has_mems = nodes_and(*new_mems, cp->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
-
- /*
- * If it becomes empty, inherit the effective mask of the
- * parent, which is guaranteed to have some MEMs.
- */
- if (is_in_v2_mode() && !has_mems)
- *new_mems = parent->effective_mems;
+ compute_effective_nodemask(new_mems, cp, parent);
/* Skip the whole subtree if the nodemask remains the same. */
if (nodes_equal(*new_mems, cp->effective_mems)) {
@@ -3923,7 +3930,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
parent = parent_cs(cs);
compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
- nodes_and(new_mems, cs->mems_allowed, parent->effective_mems);
+ compute_effective_nodemask(&new_mems, cs, parent);
if (!tmp || !cs->partition_root_state)
goto update_tasks;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
index 0d41aa0d343d..ca9bc38fdb95 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh
@@ -495,13 +495,20 @@ REMOTE_TEST_MATRIX=(
# Narrowing cpuset.cpus to previously sibling-excluded CPUs should
# not return CPUs that were never actually owned.
" C1-4:P1 . C1-2:P1 C1-3:P2 . . \
- . . . C3 . . p1:4|c11:1-2|c12:3 \
+ . . . C3 . . p1:4|c11:1-2|c12:3 \
p1:P1|c11:P1|c12:P2 3"
# Expanding cpuset.cpus to include a previously sibling-excluded CPU
# after the sibling has become a member should correctly request it.
" C1-4:P1 . C1-2:P1 C1-3:P2 . . \
- . . P0 C2-3 . . p1:1,4|c11:1|c12:2-3 \
+ . . P0 C2-3 . . p1:1,4|c11:1|c12:2-3 \
p1:P1|c11:P0|c12:P2 2-3"
+ # Cpusets with empty cpuset.cpus should inherit parent's effective_cpus
+ " C1-4:P1 C5-6 C1-2 . C5 . \
+ . P1 P1 . . . p1:3-4|p2:5-6|c11:1-2|c12:3-4|c21:5|c22:5-6 \
+ p1:P1|p2:P1|c11:P1"
+ " C1-4:P1 C5-6 C1-2 . C5 . \
+ . P1 P1 . O5=0 . p1:3-4|p2:6|c11:1-2|c12:3-4|c21:6|c22:6 \
+ p1:P1|p2:P1|c11:P1"
)
#
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 23:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] cgroup/cpuset: Miscellaneous fixes and cleanups Waiman Long
2026-06-23 23:04 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-06-23 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cgroup/cpuset: Rebind/migrate mm only for threadgroup leader in cpuset_update_tasks_nodemask() Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623230413.1984188-2-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox