From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F03C543F8BE; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 18:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783622526; cv=none; b=TyBAhbQ1Z2aUxZX+IRRAEGzgon7GHKMAIl4Z61DGbwjuzZJRggDC6iSzCnUX3Mb/KIIVcEH+EY/xcYwos9kQm6t1JRTUrb+w84tk8uxA0xHhMXKWD/WmRSqL+t5MVkRWMxf1xZxPadLJKVelRrrAEiN2Az+8t7jSSKK48wPm8zI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783622526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=BajwKwkCicZNqGFggSh5ej6E7a4bu+FiOroWiOxEQE1iIP5P59mHFGAv1vOd6LFWsr4ma/j6C77gMBNSBq7n++bJx3ZWZIt+9O7Br5ezA7mdNzOoH9Iko/h5zmFfqWu3ho3Zv6l3vVLSofwe+tRyJsMxdN2krPXAiso60bkNp1E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VpaG0lqU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VpaG0lqU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6881A1F000E9; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 18:42:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783622524; bh=V9/QBsgUl+YAHSU3KRVgzfp7o3z60FnCLy+stiPlLsM=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=VpaG0lqUM9AJpjH5h2yYuDiybRa/XGorO8CR+46KxgKuXsP+ZlD24JnA3NGHjZSbj VDvCQsTokNpbKimzr6UHWc03P9iPWK2n+WS4t+Zr5u22pU59ELlG79TDr+cbUMsAgd pUdz/3yFvNgyufCzUqMngT9KXWls3TVQh3VCs0T7vvnXRF18wvfMAQZgF7ctMH31xC CnQhN3Sufw/1roZvIvf7YDQsx++KToaYsk6AnqwtucyNGyPQ0p5NH4JCC1Zk6Bl9rd O4Jwa0tz9/ePPoPCvda6A5nmR+LOLWWh+7doeeD+tYUkQJN0MON8RpOf/1cPHpqfQo qRuhFLhq/s9iA== From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:27:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v12 26/29] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-26-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org> References: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-0-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260709-kvm-arm64-sme-v12-0-d0301d79ef58@kernel.org> To: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Catalin Marinas , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton Cc: Dave Martin , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , Ben Horgan , Jean-Philippe Brucker , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.16-dev X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=1200; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=3zzAFIxW4QntGIfc+v0S58ciMfKRPipxII9rhMorBnU=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBqT+r+KQ1zJ80C6wnIIVYlDY8xGooQpjWeJucoZ +qY2kBb6z+JATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCak/q/gAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0B3wB/9iWEG1cKGN60DbAJRUDX2lO5oQv99lWbCu882DlgSdoN82JGfBtU6ZnDJi8u/469CrkMR kRO/PhUMi4/+Tpwxs6LT8Fw5NgV+aWwsDvJ8vBYyHmOuhX1pBYRpyP1V5+K5cYWkEcRLLBxmVh0 cs+tpR+QhvQ06Qznczflff9hA13XAsyZIQ+tPnj0oSEfka3mTIOBYnq4JbuJVJlaCgNg3UHtNFj HgP8Zry8wOJ4BNQvN5BaZQNzHQxGo7QyqfYu2YgkkcDgO2yDBKYN/Seg75MJG2mKErHBsjUfOnd QqbduqIMjyKkJRifjaYRXWPUY/EU3Mb/IKHovBkzYlwG0uUX X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB get_safe_value() currently asserts that bitfields it is generating a safe value for must be more than one bit wide but in actual fact it should always be possible to generate a safe value to write to a bitfield even if it is just the current value and the function correctly handles that. Remove the assert. Fixes: bf09ee918053e ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BITS and its last user") Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c index 7429a1055df5..9eceac84e297 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c @@ -279,8 +279,6 @@ u64 get_safe_value(const struct reg_ftr_bits *ftr_bits, u64 ftr) { u64 ftr_max = ftr_bits->mask >> ftr_bits->shift; - TEST_ASSERT(ftr_max > 1, "This test doesn't support single bit features"); - if (ftr_bits->sign == FTR_UNSIGNED) { switch (ftr_bits->type) { case FTR_EXACT: -- 2.47.3