From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: Josh Hilke <jrhilke@google.com>, alex@shazbot.org, dmatlack@google.com
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
ajayachandra@nvidia.com, alex@shazbot.org, amastro@fb.com,
ankita@nvidia.com, apopple@nvidia.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
chrisl@kernel.org, christian.koenig@amd.com, corbet@lwn.net,
dmatlack@google.com, graf@amazon.com,
jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com, jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
julianr@linux.ibm.com, kees@kernel.org, kevin.tian@intel.com,
leon@kernel.org, leonro@nvidia.com, lukas@wunner.de,
mattev@meta.com, michal.winiarski@intel.com, parav@nvidia.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, praan@google.com,
pratyush@kernel.org, rananta@google.com, rientjes@google.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, rppt@kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
skhawaja@google.com, vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, witu@nvidia.com,
yanjun.zhu@linux.dev, yi.l.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/20] vfio/pci: Preserve vfio-pci device files across Live Update
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:55:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723181436.GB260824.vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <al_8v_I9Z2Dc_qjc@google.com>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:16:25PM +0000, Josh Hilke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 08:14:51AM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > +static int vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> > +{
> > + struct vfio_device *device = vfio_device_from_file(args->file);
> > + struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev;
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > +
> > + vdev = container_of(device, struct vfio_pci_core_device, vdev);
> > + pdev = vdev->pdev;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&device->dev_set->lock);
> > + guard(mutex)(&vdev->igate);
> > + guard(rwsem_write)(&vdev->memory_lock);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Userspace must disable interrupts on the device prior to freeze so
> > + * that the device does not send any interrupts until new interrupt
> > + * handlers have been established by the next kernel.
> > + */
> > + if (vdev->irq_type != VFIO_PCI_NUM_IRQS) {
> > + pci_err(pdev, "Freeze failed! Interrupts are still enabled.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (pdev->current_state != PCI_D0) {
> > + pci_err(pdev, "Freeze failed! Device not in D0 state.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Reset is a temporary measure to provide kernel after kexec a clean
> > + * device while VFIO live update work is under development and not
> > + * fully supported. It will go away once continuous DMA support is
> > + * added to device preservation.
> > + */
> > + vfio_pci_zap_bars(vdev);
> > + vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(vdev, true);
> > + vfio_pci_core_try_reset(vdev);
>
> I'm seeing the same lockdep splat the David found in v4.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ag-aFA1BJxdJMywr@google.com/#t
Thanks for reminding this.
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 7.2.0-dbg-DEV #3 Tainted: G S
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kexec/13355 is trying to acquire lock:
> ff3f086c95315d08 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ff3f082de7f399a8 (&vdev->memory_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x58/0x100
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #5 (&vdev->memory_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
> down_read+0x3d/0x160
> vfio_pci_mmap_huge_fault+0xb9/0x150
> __do_fault+0x46/0x150
> do_pte_missing+0x21a/0x1000
> handle_mm_fault+0x7f8/0xb60
> do_user_addr_fault+0x476/0x6c0
> exc_page_fault+0x68/0xa0
> asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
>
> -> #4 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
> __might_fault+0x5e/0x80
> _copy_to_user+0x23/0x60
> perf_read+0x114/0x310
> vfs_read+0xe7/0x360
> ksys_read+0x73/0x100
> do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x4e0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> __mutex_lock+0x8c/0xd80
> perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x15a/0x210
> perf_event_enable+0x18/0xa0
> lockup_detector_online_cpu+0x22/0x30
> cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xfb/0x2c0
> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x164/0x1e0
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x17e/0x280
> kthread+0x10c/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x16b/0x310
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> -> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}:
> cpuhp_thread_fun+0x95/0x1e0
> smpboot_thread_fn+0x17e/0x280
> kthread+0x10c/0x140
> ret_from_fork+0x16b/0x310
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
> cpus_read_lock+0x3b/0xd0
> __cpuhp_state_add_instance+0x19/0x40
> iova_domain_init_rcaches+0x1ef/0x230
> iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x18a/0x560
> iommu_device_register+0x188/0x220
> intel_iommu_init+0x35a/0x440
> pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x40
> do_one_initcall+0xf5/0x400
> do_initcall_level+0x82/0xa0
> do_initcalls+0x59/0xa0
> kernel_init_freeable+0x152/0x1d0
> kernel_init+0x1a/0x130
> ret_from_fork+0x16b/0x310
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> -> #0 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
> __lock_acquire+0x14c8/0x2750
> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x2c0
> __mutex_lock+0x8c/0xd80
> pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> pcie_flr+0x32/0xc0
> __pci_reset_function_locked+0x84/0x120
> vfio_pci_core_try_reset+0xa4/0x110
> vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x8a/0x100
> luo_file_freeze+0xd1/0x290
> luo_session_serialize+0xa6/0x240
> liveupdate_reboot+0x19/0x30
> kernel_kexec+0x39/0xb0
> __se_sys_reboot+0xfd/0x210
> do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x4e0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> &group->mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &vdev->memory_lock
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(&vdev->memory_lock);
> lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
> lock(&vdev->memory_lock);
> lock(&group->mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 9 locks held by kexec/13355:
> #0: ffffffff85a81270 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __se_sys_reboot+0xe4/0x210
> #1: ffffffff85e1cfa8 (luo_session_serialize_rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: luo_session_serialize+0x30/0x240
> #2: ffffffff85e1d140 (luo_session_global.outgoing.rwsem){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: luo_session_serialize+0x43/0x240
> #3: ff3f082dee702108 (&session->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: luo_session_serialize+0x99/0x240
> #4: ff3f082db51c2588 (&luo_file->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: luo_file_freeze+0x81/0x290
> #5: ff3f082d8af761a8 (&new_dev_set->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x38/0x100
> #6: ff3f082de7f39780 (&vdev->igate){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x49/0x100
> #7: ff3f082de7f399a8 (&vdev->memory_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x58/0x100
> #8: ff3f086c908911f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: pci_dev_trylock+0x25/0x60
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 132 UID: 0 PID: 13355 Comm: kexec Tainted: G S 7.2.0-dbg-DEV #3 PREEMPTLAZY
> Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC
> Hardware name: Google Izumi/izumi, BIOS 0.20260327.0-0 03/27/2026
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x70
> print_circular_bug+0x2e1/0x300
> check_noncircular+0xf9/0x120
> ? __bfs+0x129/0x200
> __lock_acquire+0x14c8/0x2750
> ? __lock_acquire+0x1223/0x2750
> ? check_noncircular+0xa5/0x120
> ? pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> lock_acquire+0xd3/0x2c0
> ? pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> ? lock_is_held_type+0x76/0x100
> ? pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> __mutex_lock+0x8c/0xd80
> ? pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x152/0x220
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x50
> pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare+0x6e/0x200
> pcie_flr+0x32/0xc0
> __pci_reset_function_locked+0x84/0x120
> vfio_pci_core_try_reset+0xa4/0x110
> vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze+0x8a/0x100
> luo_file_freeze+0xd1/0x290
> luo_session_serialize+0xa6/0x240
> liveupdate_reboot+0x19/0x30
> kernel_kexec+0x39/0xb0
> __se_sys_reboot+0xfd/0x210
> ? check_object+0x1e8/0x390
> ? init_object+0x34/0x110
> ? lock_release+0xf0/0x330
> ? kmem_cache_free+0x1b5/0x520
> ? kmem_cache_free+0x1c9/0x520
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x50
> ? kmem_cache_free+0x1b5/0x520
> ? __x64_sys_close+0x3d/0x80
> ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> do_syscall_64+0x15f/0x4e0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> RIP: 0033:0x7f04e7233313
> Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 89 fa b8 a9 00 00 00 bf ad de e1 fe be 69 19 12 28 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 f7 d8 48 8b 0d eb fb 06 00 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007ffe7c91b688 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f04e7233313
> RDX: 0000000045584543 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead
> RBP: 00007ffe7c91b9b0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00007f04e72a4ff0
> R10: 0000000000000011 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000002
> </TASK>
>
This lock chain is slightly different than what David reported in his
email on v4.
Current dependency chain for v5:
-> #5 (&vdev->memory_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
-> #4 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
-> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: // Different
-> #2 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}: // Different
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
-> #0 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
David's dependency chain on v4:
-> #4 (&vdev->memory_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
-> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
-> #2 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#4){++++}-{4:4}: // Different
-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
-> #0 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
This seems like &group->mutex connects to cpu_hotplug_lock during boot,
and cpu_hotplug_lock can connect to &mm->mmap_lock through any
subsystems like Perf, VFS, etc.
One thing to note, VFIO has an existing ioctl VFIO_DEVICE_RESET which
calls vfio_pci_ioctl_reset() and locks are taken in the same order in
that function:
Lock vdev->memory_lock
-> pci_try_reset_function()
-> pcie_flr()
-> pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare()
-> Try to lock iommu_group->mutex
pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare() is added in pcie_flr() in the commit
f5b16b802174 ("PCI: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a
device"). So, this is relatively a new change and may have not been
caught yet.
This is similar to what vfio_pci_liveupdate_freeze() is also doing
regarding locks and reset.
I am not 100% this is an actual issue considering group->mutex to
cpu_hotplug_lock dependency happens early in boot.
If this is an issue which must be fixed, I think we would have to makea
flow like:
1. lock vdev->memory_lock
2. Disable memory in PCI_COMMAND.
3. Unlock vdev->memory_lock
4. Do PCI reset
5. Lock vdev->memory_lock and resume as old flow.
I wrote a test code (with assistance from GEMINI) to trigger lockdep
warning in 7.2-rc1 kernel commit without any liveupdate patches and I
can reproduce issue on a host having Intel DSA device (8086:0b25). This
program mmaps a BAR of a VFIO device and reads it, after that it
resets the device.
Expected: Program exits cleanly, without any lockdep warning.
Actual: Lockdep warning is printed similar to above.
--------------------------------------
/*
* vfio_cdev_lockdep_reproducer.c
*
* Standalone reproducer using modern VFIO cdev (/dev/vfio/devices/vfioX)
* and IOMMUFD (/dev/iommu) interfaces to trigger Lockdep circular locking
* dependency between &vdev->memory_lock and &group->mutex on ATS PCI devices.
*
* Requirements:
* - Kernel booted with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y (Lockdep enabled)
* - An ATS-capable PCIe device bound to vfio-pci (e.g., Intel DSA / idxd)
*
* Build:
* gcc -Wall -static vfio_cdev_lockdep_reproducer.c -o vfio_cdev_lockdep_reproducer
*
* Usage:
* sudo ./vfio_cdev_lockdep_reproducer <pci_bdf>
* Example: sudo ./vfio_cdev_lockdep_reproducer 0000:6a:01.0
*/
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <linux/vfio.h>
#include <linux/iommufd.h>
static int find_vfio_cdev_path(const char *bdf, char *cdev_path, size_t size)
{
struct dirent *entry;
char dir_path[256];
DIR *dir;
snprintf(dir_path, sizeof(dir_path),
"/sys/bus/pci/devices/%s/vfio-dev/", bdf);
dir = opendir(dir_path);
if (!dir) {
fprintf(stderr, "[-] Failed to open %s (is %s bound?)\n",
dir_path, bdf);
return -1;
}
while ((entry = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
if (strncmp("vfio", entry->d_name, 4) == 0) {
snprintf(cdev_path, size, "/dev/vfio/devices/%s",
entry->d_name);
closedir(dir);
return 0;
}
}
closedir(dir);
return -1;
}
static int setup_vfio_cdev(const char *bdf, int *out_iommufd,
int *out_device_fd)
{
struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach_args;
struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind_args;
struct iommu_ioas_alloc ioas_args;
char cdev_path[4096];
int iommufd;
int device_fd;
uint32_t ioas_id;
int ret;
ret = find_vfio_cdev_path(bdf, cdev_path, sizeof(cdev_path));
if (ret < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "[-] Could not find cdev path for %s\n", bdf);
return -1;
}
printf("[*] Found VFIO cdev node: %s\n", cdev_path);
printf("[*] Opening /dev/iommu (IOMMUFD)...\n");
iommufd = open("/dev/iommu", O_RDWR);
if (iommufd < 0) {
perror("open(/dev/iommu)");
return -1;
}
memset(&ioas_args, 0, sizeof(ioas_args));
ioas_args.size = sizeof(ioas_args);
if (ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_IOAS_ALLOC, &ioas_args) < 0) {
perror("IOMMU_IOAS_ALLOC");
close(iommufd);
return -1;
}
ioas_id = ioas_args.out_ioas_id;
printf("[+] Allocated IOMMUFD IOAS ID = %u\n", ioas_id);
printf("[*] Opening VFIO cdev device %s...\n", cdev_path);
device_fd = open(cdev_path, O_RDWR);
if (device_fd < 0) {
perror("open(cdev_path)");
close(iommufd);
return -1;
}
memset(&bind_args, 0, sizeof(bind_args));
bind_args.argsz = sizeof(bind_args);
bind_args.flags = 0;
bind_args.iommufd = iommufd;
if (ioctl(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, &bind_args) < 0) {
perror("VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD");
close(device_fd);
close(iommufd);
return -1;
}
printf("[+] Bound VFIO device to IOMMUFD (devid = %u)\n",
bind_args.out_devid);
memset(&attach_args, 0, sizeof(attach_args));
attach_args.argsz = sizeof(attach_args);
attach_args.flags = 0;
attach_args.pt_id = ioas_id;
if (ioctl(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT, &attach_args) < 0) {
perror("VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT");
close(device_fd);
close(iommufd);
return -1;
}
printf("[+] Attached VFIO device to IOAS ID %u\n", ioas_id);
*out_iommufd = iommufd;
*out_device_fd = device_fd;
return 0;
}
static void exercise_bar_fault(int device_fd)
{
struct vfio_region_info reg;
volatile unsigned char dummy;
bool bar_mmapped;
void *map;
int i;
bar_mmapped = false;
for (i = VFIO_PCI_BAR0_REGION_INDEX; i <= VFIO_PCI_BAR5_REGION_INDEX; i++) {
memset(®, 0, sizeof(reg));
reg.argsz = sizeof(reg);
reg.index = i;
if (ioctl(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_INFO, ®) < 0)
continue;
if (!(reg.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_MMAP) || reg.size == 0)
continue;
printf("[*] Found BAR%d (0x%llx). mmap()ing...\n",
i, (unsigned long long)reg.size);
map = mmap(NULL, reg.size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, device_fd, reg.offset);
if (map == MAP_FAILED)
continue;
printf("[*] Touching BAR%d to trigger fault...\n", i);
dummy = *((volatile unsigned char *)map);
(void)dummy;
bar_mmapped = true;
break;
}
if (!bar_mmapped) {
printf("[!] No mmapable BAR found on this device.\n");
printf("[!] For QEMU, try: -device nvme,serial=1,ats=on\n");
}
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
const char *pci_bdf;
int device_fd;
int iommufd;
int ret;
if (argc != 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <pci_bdf>\n", argv[0]);
fprintf(stderr, "Example: %s 0000:6a:01.0\n", argv[0]);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
pci_bdf = argv[1];
ret = setup_vfio_cdev(pci_bdf, &iommufd, &device_fd);
if (ret < 0)
return EXIT_FAILURE;
/*
* Step 1: Exercise Page Fault path (mmap_lock -> memory_lock).
* Scan BAR0 to BAR5 and mmap the first region supporting mmap().
* Touching 1 byte causes page fault via vfio_pci_mmap_huge_fault(),
* taking down_read(&vdev->memory_lock).
*/
exercise_bar_fault(device_fd);
/*
* Step 2: Trigger VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl.
* Takes down_write(&vdev->memory_lock) -> pci_try_reset_function() ->
* pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare(), taking guard(mutex)(&group->mutex).
*
* Lockdep detects the circular dependency and reports WARNING.
*/
printf("[*] Issuing VFIO_DEVICE_RESET ioctl under memory_lock...\n");
if (ioctl(device_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET) < 0) {
perror("VFIO_DEVICE_RESET");
} else {
printf("[+] VFIO_DEVICE_RESET completed successfully.\n");
}
printf("[*] Check 'dmesg' for Lockdep circular dependency report!\n");
close(device_fd);
close(iommufd);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
--------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 15:14 [PATCH v5 00/20] vfio/pci: Base Live Update support for VFIO Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] vfio/pci: Factor out the reset logic in VFIO PCI device close path Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] vfio: Export various helpers from VFIO Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] vfio/pci: Export vfio_pci_dma_buf_move for vfio-pci module Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] liveupdate: Export symbols needed by modules Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] vfio/pci: Register a file handler with Live Update Orchestrator Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] vfio/pci: Preserve vfio-pci device files across Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-21 23:16 ` Josh Hilke
2026-07-23 21:55 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] vfio: Introduce vfio_find_device() helper Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] vfio: Refactor vfio_device_fops_cdev_open() Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] vfio: Add API to open cdev device for Live Update restore Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] vfio/pci: Retrieve preserved device files after Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-21 16:23 ` Josh Hilke
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] vfio: Enforce preserved devices are retrieved via LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_RETRIEVE_FD Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] docs: liveupdate: Add documentation for VFIO PCI Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] vfio: selftests: Build liveupdate library in VFIO selftests Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:14 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_uapi_test Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] vfio: selftests: Initialize vfio_pci_device using a VFIO cdev FD Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] vfio: selftests: Add Makefile support for TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 17/20] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] vfio: selftests: Expose iommu_modes to tests Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] vfio: selftests: Verify that opening VFIO device fails during Live Update Vipin Sharma
2026-07-14 15:15 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] vfio: selftests: Add continuous DMA to vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test Vipin Sharma
[not found] ` <2c03ac97-60a6-4352-a942-27dcebae8d22@linux.dev>
[not found] ` <8fd94fad-e457-4839-9e41-ae257a138bee@linux.dev>
2026-07-20 17:08 ` [PATCH v5 00/20] vfio/pci: Base Live Update support for VFIO Vipin Sharma
2026-07-23 22:18 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-07-23 23:01 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-07-23 22:58 ` Vipin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723181436.GB260824.vipinsh@google.com \
--to=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=amastro@fb.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mattev@meta.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox