Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
	<devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: rodrigo.alencar@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 15/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: show channel priority in debugfs
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 23:56:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260725235621.6dd73e71@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722-ad9910-iio-driver-v9-15-459d1df5ac56@analog.com>

On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:50:24 +0100
Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay <devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Rodrigo Alencar <rodrigo.alencar@analog.com>
> 
> Expose frequency_source, phase_source and amplitude_source attributes in
> debugfs. Those indicate from which channel the specific DDS parameter is
> being sourced by returning its label. The implementation follows the
> priority table found in the datasheet.
> 
For this one sashiko raised some questions and made me wonder how this
actually works given it is using active_scan_masks and so far we don't
have any buffered support in the driver.  My guess is you backported
this from on top of some other code that you haven't posted yet.

Please have another check that this all works with just the series
posted.

Note that you will need to claim buffer mode successfully to mess
around with that in paths that aren't inherently only used in buffered
mode.



> @@ -2078,6 +2092,171 @@ static int ad9910_setup(struct device *dev, struct ad9910_state *st,
>  	return ad9910_io_update(st);
>  }
>  
> +static inline const char *ad9910_frequency_source_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> +	struct ad9910_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +	bool ram_en, mode_en;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&st->lock);
> +
> +	/* RAM enabled and data destination is frequency */
> +	ram_en = AD9910_RAM_ENABLED(st);
> +	if (ram_en && AD9910_DEST_FREQUENCY ==
> +		      FIELD_GET(AD9910_CFR1_RAM_PLAYBACK_DEST_MSK,
> +				st->reg[AD9910_REG_CFR1].val32))
> +		return ad9910_channel_str[AD9910_CHAN_IDX_RAM];
> +
> +	/* DRG enabled and data destination is frequency */
> +	mode_en = FIELD_GET(AD9910_CFR2_DRG_ENABLE_MSK,
> +			    st->reg[AD9910_REG_CFR2].val32);
> +	if (mode_en && AD9910_DEST_FREQUENCY ==
> +		       FIELD_GET(AD9910_CFR2_DRG_DEST_MSK,
> +				 st->reg[AD9910_REG_CFR2].val32))
> +		return ad9910_channel_str[AD9910_CHAN_IDX_DRG_FREQ];
> +
> +	/* Parallel data port enabled and data destination is frequency */
> +	mode_en = FIELD_GET(AD9910_CFR2_PARALLEL_DATA_PORT_EN_MSK,
> +			    st->reg[AD9910_REG_CFR2].val32);
> +	if (mode_en && indio_dev->active_scan_mask &&

active_scan_mask is only set on a call to iio_enable_buffers.
So what is this checking?  I guess today it will always fail as
active_scan_mask is NULL.  Once that is in use, it will be racy
however, so you'll need to claim buffered mode (or fail in which
case the null check isn't needed).  That claim will hold it
in a particular state - under the hood it is taking mlock
which is what sashiko suggests - that is just meant to be opaque
to drivers so do it with an explicit attempt to claim buffered mode.


> +	    test_bit(AD9910_SCAN_IDX_FREQ, indio_dev->active_scan_mask))
> +		return ad9910_channel_str[AD9910_CHAN_IDX_PARALLEL_FREQ];
> +
> +	/* FTW: RAM enabled and data destination is phase, amplitude, or polar */
> +	if (ram_en)
> +		return ad9910_channel_str[AD9910_CHAN_IDX_RAM];
> +
> +	/* single tone profiles */
> +	return ad9910_channel_str[AD9910_CHAN_IDX_PROFILE_0 + st->profile];
> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-25 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22 15:50 [PATCH v9 00/17] AD9910 Direct Digital Synthesizer Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] iio: ABI: add attributes for altcurrent channels Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] iio: ABI: raw, scale and offset for frequency/phase channels Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] iio: ABI: add parent entry for iio channels Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] iio: add IIO_FREQUENCY channel type Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] iio: core: support 64-bit register through debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] iio: core: create local __iio_chan_prefix_emit() for reuse Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] iio: test: add kunit tests for channel prefix naming generation Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-25 22:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] iio: core: add hierarchical channel relationships Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-25 22:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] dt-bindings: iio: frequency: add ad9910 Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: initial driver implementation Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-25 22:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: add basic parallel port support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: add digital ramp generator support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: add RAM mode support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-25 22:46   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: add output shift keying support Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] iio: frequency: ad9910: show channel priority in debugfs Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-25 22:56   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] iio: ABI: add docs for ad9910 sysfs and debugfs entries Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay
2026-07-22 15:50 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] docs: iio: add documentation for ad9910 driver Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260725235621.6dd73e71@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+rodrigo.alencar.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.alencar@analog.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox