From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com (mail-wm1-f49.google.com [209.85.128.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3803B450414 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785435881; cv=none; b=kwqbUdQDIzE2MKiqj0P3sbdOMPuDTthx/WmXKncVbWu+GAkQEuUWGuGxWKnrRPAfhtOIGSEb/wUUQztNzsiZrCd16WUKdRTA+qqfOmLR98hUEjp4kUKeTz+bBs8hNU3gwsTg47oMSyOBjGK6sYEYUF4erIPnPmadluIxQEaNivU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785435881; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9sV36zm4Pp0vB7jfMDxNs36acLATXLKZM+RqCQGuQ+8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CeZc+3q1XY1M2jbGSehih3xHtHpg+7a3f0b77eeUGQTcv0kOLonROgzl3GVmm/nPrhlkczVOKZADVWvzqtgrKBU700tnkgh5ofqXOucMfeUEVFRBh7ESXUMK7APCGh48c1BgQQpGqcF+qiX5Woij569GuMGp6tKhz8h+dpUiCZw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b=lA4v9oif; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=chromium.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="lA4v9oif" Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49556f97a9dso576745e9.1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1785435873; x=1786040673; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=lbirN5OGmG09g2d8b+3odPVgp6feGkgDgocLsc+TSTY=; b=lA4v9oifTrmHcH0q9YjSwQFIx8ZCeXR9qLlohFodYpAW0KpLprAw/teOU2VwGVMj3T FVNO73xKVIO1Vt6ylTLLKBpKJRn95cSP7sgp5SrP+nk5UgB5OQRolhRInRv7JmARllxY wWl6+vNgl1KYeodD8fncqEsKmL6hkfZdLDTW0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785435873; x=1786040673; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=lbirN5OGmG09g2d8b+3odPVgp6feGkgDgocLsc+TSTY=; b=htMdFLn9A7kwRL26wNAetcYSk7+qayLbJDW1YN7u4vbXn30zeJqaaLsaLwbTFYL7Gu o4e0mTPsK5Q847ywpbk+2WaclowajFo7L61PUL0HjT73/RUrFLx4ysHVKIesyDq8fopU bN5g/eYgAH/4K8sSlCThR4PiaUw6+DkVTQ2v1a4tz5TZAqlT9iusAZbiGPBOh0OEd+FI SMq30Hygusa4Bvfv0X0DUNzFaCLb8w5u9Jx70s7JpTIpdSz7865LrHQVdBFXSfcb+UBA ZEYtn+y/kT+fHmO6TK31OmKD7QxlWxeqV0Or8ExQxmo3kY194aPT9brPw6kEetVv77K6 c+yg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RqIyQf0PR/mnwToR+f4V5tO/fVUiRFqxpzYk2HJRveleDVjlRtjwGHPfL4WA70greSOddzvblYmSz0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw5Yt7qhmyfoWlCVYorBW4CeDvggtFauqqIro8zo/QcuccGtarq EBIyt2cNibhrPA1x35lMelolo276I3SYByrOnW5VBS0sbk88j0/PSUdyFx9Qruw1+Q== X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD11S0jOmrZJoqRz3gVqeTDsrRSK6o2W2G6QcTksojsVyh0uE3RL7gv8OsvBbkE9 5maFjZViUjiQ+kvo8a/WDh4d4IfkZj9qSl39ATkQ/gWz5AQeh40IXuRBQgOCt73AuS7pTvoDt2T 12tBM3LWRPnaLy2Qhm9l7Yq/JIzUZqdldjj955LMu20yez19r/yH8pBOfBi6Pu6MRI451zspktQ K8j/iExGIo8jrDWZ5ahw7RqLBdIeUp+0qxeuzA/2guZY2hun65yvJCm+vPI+w1izdBjmAMopDhb jXOhciRxhqs6sTOa7BYmWd5fltzEaM9zW9JZiX2bkqeWeGTpEJCuoHxuEhr55jpoFc2+wYFYWNC sQWuAT6Nrcd1472uP5XBvWjnKAxNAAuZhkzAukJNa8Pq7iaOuyIR3YGj9cIeYJ7XhVRbPWzs9xC eX8WDIJIj4d/iiHiEG+kFWjHAK0kP6lXiJ0qAlszrDo8KVTWkQ6hvVgevAZq1cdq4LFFVS+mzI3 PNYqvAZO/1BeUqqOYr+DT4Z/TrttuOUYHeNOKBMzoF//93Wc4TWbCM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:6099:b0:496:c18c:f998 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-49800ea2197mr53831885e9.19.1785435872774; Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmaluka.c.googlers.com.com (110.121.148.146.bc.googleusercontent.com. [146.148.121.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-498010aade3sm84008685e9.14.2026.07.30.11.24.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Jul 2026 11:24:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Dmytro Maluka To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Dave Hansen , Mathias Krause , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Vineeth Pillai , Chuanxiao Dong , Aashish Sharma , Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Dmytro Maluka Subject: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: Fix treating KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID as inclusive Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:24:23 +0000 Message-ID: <20260730182425.1223530-2-dmaluka@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.55.0.508.g3f0d502094-goog In-Reply-To: <20260730182425.1223530-1-dmaluka@chromium.org> References: <20260730182425.1223530-1-dmaluka@chromium.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is (confusingly) exclusive, i.e. the maximum allowed vcpu_id value is KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID minus one. Some tests in x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c and kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c mistakenly treat it as inclusive, in particular, assume that setting bsp_vcpu_id to KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is valid and should succeed. Fix those tests. Fixes: 4b451a57809c ("KVM: selftests: Test max vCPU IDs corner cases") Fixes: 438a496b9041 ("KVM: selftests: Test vCPU boot IDs above 2^32 and MAX_VCPU_ID") Signed-off-by: Dmytro Maluka --- .../selftests/kvm/x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c | 17 ++++++++++------- .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c index 7e2bfb3c3f3b..43f16c052de4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/max_vcpuid_cap_test.c @@ -30,22 +30,25 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID)) { vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *)MAX_VCPU_ID); - /* Try setting KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID below BOOT_CPU_ID */ - ret = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID - 1); + /* Try setting KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID below or equal to BOOT_CPU_ID */ + ret = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID); TEST_ASSERT(ret < 0, - "Setting KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID below BOOT_CPU_ID should fail"); + "Setting KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID <= BOOT_CPU_ID should fail"); } - /* Set KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID */ - vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID); + /* + * Set KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID. Note: KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is a misnomer, + * it actually represents maximum vcpu_id plus one. + */ + vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID + 1); /* Try to set KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID again */ - ret = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID + 1); + ret = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID, MAX_VCPU_ID + 2); TEST_ASSERT(ret < 0, "Setting KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID multiple times should fail"); /* Create vCPU with id beyond KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID cap */ - ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)MAX_VCPU_ID); + ret = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_CREATE_VCPU, (void *)(MAX_VCPU_ID + 1)); TEST_ASSERT(ret < 0, "Creating vCPU with ID > MAX_VCPU_ID should fail"); /* Create vCPU with bits 63:32 != 0, but an otherwise valid id */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c index 8e3898646c69..1c4ebdf8e82c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/set_boot_cpu_id.c @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static void test_set_invalid_bsp(struct kvm_vm *vm) int r; if (max_vcpu_id) { - r = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *)(max_vcpu_id + 1)); - TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "BSP with ID > MAX should fail"); + r = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *)max_vcpu_id); + TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == EINVAL, "BSP with ID >= MAX should fail"); } r = __vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_SET_BOOT_CPU_ID, (void *)(1L << 32)); -- 2.55.0.508.g3f0d502094-goog