Re: [RFC PATCH 0/12] drm/fabric: vendor-neutral topology infrastructure for scale-up accelerator interconnects

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:01:20PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 08:09:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:38:58PM +0300, Konstantin Sinyuk wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 12:32:22PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > 
> > <...>
> > 
> > > > The wording alone is not sufficient. Your proposal should be backed by
> > > > real devices representing different architectures from different
> > > > vendors.
> > > 
> > > Future Intel (and other vendors) hardware will include UALink.
> > 
> > I guess that, like most of us, you are not authorized to discuss or
> > comment on Intel's non-public roadmap. Can you point to any public
> > commitment from Intel to implement UALink in its devices?
> 
> That's the only public support commitment you will find for now:
> 
> https://ualinkconsortium.org/blog/intel-supports-ualink-for-scale-up-networking-829/
> 
> as an active member of the consortium
> https://ualinkconsortium.org/members/

I saw that PR article, but I couldn't find anything on the Internet stating
that "future Intel (or other vendors') hardware will include UALink."

So, for now, this RFC can be considered an academic project.

Thanks