From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch (mail-4322.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808D532ED21 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2026 02:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788833944; cv=none; b=sLPZzJ3ozgLWwbT2CsMU2GZNE33g0XHLEShsZJdu75jSrHbqOufjPtFvOmPmiQhIifo6D3r13fzyWEfD/2ICqwRH+nY9U12jYGl5pGGelhCorUhF3B7oLHEyfeNCFon8rS0E+59kDL+1C3oSx8NyAIjAWAlPGcPRfdmWOWrRpEM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788833944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ckZPKP6MIV+rGzRcTmVrwD7IJjzrjIx54TsqsetafqI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Uj+Pgpf3ezwLyIlB/W0ppCCxJ6EVBMiNZ+pgODyUmHAGHp7L7bAlAODB9Xzzpu1qZac7EAedrD+g41iX98QkTlyJtOnq7rjYjfYIIFf2TrgXW0V45dysv+/HXVVTtiH89S70so1264vasyAADhzB61w5lcFutqLGuGlZRnCCt8w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b=J1VzTJPN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b="J1VzTJPN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail3; t=1788833937; x=1789093137; bh=ckZPKP6MIV+rGzRcTmVrwD7IJjzrjIx54TsqsetafqI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=J1VzTJPN3PJEscotfVTzDLDuDl6fXWsyan3PL/N2t175BG17LRYNdIFgZf6ND0tCm MyIOWAqDbTc9joEQrcyXNyocVXtrMPZJymXoX463FBnm2ET0UdEvlI6TEhuXCPjOu2 2pDICjFgbkW9kGVFz3AQgqHsGIzMHWhvLJlPME3Cd7vdoTl2y1c06lcqba8KZYi2Rs DKLf+sighk64oUPE87BliJgGaeFeyAJuIqleFSSgdlB9qs/7Bw94CQd11a/f8IGjCS 8lSqM81YR0u9O13NJ2CixiSe+I620FvlB/iD6+i9/Ms/Rm1wxYYHL19xXdn+5euQqr 7uQORjiGzk//g== Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 02:18:54 +0000 To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org From: Birk Skyum Cc: Anvesh Jain P , Sibi Sankar , Hans de Goede , =?utf-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Bryan O'Donoghue , Guenter Roeck , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Daniel J Blueman , Maya Matuszczyk , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] platform: arm64: qcom-hamoa-ec: test sensor and variant handling Message-ID: <20260908021844.42118-1-birk.skyum@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20260908020711.ED17B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> References: <20260908015650.84401-1-birk.skyum@pm.me> <20260908015650.84401-3-birk.skyum@pm.me> <20260908020711.ED17B1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> Feedback-ID: 21326998:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: a76c158dbe87dbe248d5d35c808c3c4721c06681 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for checking this. The test client is bound to the I2C core's dummy driver by i2c_new_dummy_device(). Unregistering it unbinds that driver and releases the managed hwmon child before the adapter is deleted. I reran the arm64 KUnit image on the stated 7.3-rc2 base; all seven cases completed and the guest rebooted normally, including cleanup after the sensor-probe test. The dummy-driver binding is also documented here: https://docs.kernel.org/driver-api/i2c.html#c.i2c_new_dummy_device For the hwmon placement, I kept the small read-only sensor path in the existing EC driver, as huawei-gaokun-ec does. Guenter and linux-hwmon are already copied. Would an auxiliary driver under drivers/hwmon be preferred here? I'm happy to split it if that is the preferred direction.