Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com, harry@kernel.org
Cc: frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
	joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, boqun@kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, qiang.zhang@linux.dev, corbet@lwn.net,
	skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	surenb@google.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] rcu: make userspace barrier hook drain kvfree_rcu work
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:40:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911034059.3569914-2-matthias.goergens@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911034059.3569914-1-matthias.goergens@gmail.com>

The bcachefs ktest allocation-leak check writes rcutree.do_rcu_barrier
before reading /proc/allocinfo. While testing bcachefs performance
changes, small objects released with kfree_rcu() remained visible after
repeated writes to the hook and 20 seconds of waiting, causing otherwise
clean tests to fail their leak check.

The test assumes a stronger contract than the hook currently documents:
rcu_barrier() waits for ordinary callbacks, but does not flush objects
still held in kfree_rcu() batching or per-CPU SLUB sheaves. The retained
population eventually fell as a sheaf filled; there is no evidence here
of unbounded growth or OOM.

Changing the hook to drain kvfree_rcu() work let the same unmodified
bcachefs workload pass its allocation check. All eight checkpoints in
one VM, after 50 through 400 option changes, reported zero retained
reconcile_scan objects. This motivated the separate private-cache test
used to isolate the incomplete drain from bcachefs.

Calling kvfree_rcu_barrier() from rcu_barrier_throttled() was proposed
when kvfree_rcu_barrier() was added in 2024, to restore a clean baseline
between userspace benchmark runs. The discussion concluded that keeping
the existing hook name, adding the second operation and documenting both
was the safest compatibility choice, but the follow-up was not added.

Add that drain and document the stronger test interface. Always retain
the existing start-rate limit and perform the kvfree_rcu() drain: an
unrelated ordinary barrier does not establish that this work completed.

Retain the entry ordinary-barrier sequence snapshot. After draining,
skip the final ordinary barrier only if that snapshot is complete,
preserving the memory barrier on the completion path. Otherwise, invoke
rcu_barrier() explicitly. This keeps the ordinary-callback guarantee
independent of whether kvfree_rcu_barrier() embeds an ordinary barrier.

Clarify that the documented completion guarantee covers work queued
before the request, without preventing new work from being queued.

Earlier validation of the unconditional-drain version used four fresh
VM pairs with a private-cache fixture: controls retained the queued
object (60 to 60 active objects), and treatments drained it (60 to 59).
An ordinary-callback test passed on both kernels. Those runs predated
the guarded skip and do not validate that change. No elapsed-time
improvement is claimed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820155935.1167988-1-urezki@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
---
 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  9 ++++--
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                             | 30 ++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index 68647ff4bdd2..914b65ae9413 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -5699,9 +5699,12 @@ Kernel parameters
 			there is an ongoing too-long CSD-lock wait.
 
 	rcutree.do_rcu_barrier=	[KNL]
-			Request a call to rcu_barrier().  This is
-			throttled so that userspace tests can safely
-			hammer on the sysfs variable if they so choose.
+			Wait for deferred kfree_rcu() frees and ordinary
+			call_rcu() callbacks queued before this request to
+			complete.  This does not prevent new work from being
+			queued concurrently.  Requests are throttled so that
+			userspace tests can safely hammer on the sysfs
+			variable if they so choose.
 			If triggered before the RCU grace-period machinery
 			is fully active, this will error out with EAGAIN.
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 96848fc1f02b..93b71682306c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3989,12 +3989,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
 static unsigned long rcu_barrier_last_throttle;
 
 /**
- * rcu_barrier_throttled - Do rcu_barrier(), but limit to one per second
+ * rcu_barrier_throttled - Drain deferred RCU frees, but rate-limit starts
  *
- * This can be thought of as guard rails around rcu_barrier() that
- * permits unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
- * try_cmpxchg() is robust.  There will be at most one call per second to
- * rcu_barrier() system-wide from use of this function, which means that
+ * This can be thought of as guard rails around the deferred-free barriers
+ * that permit unrestricted userspace use, at least assuming the hardware's
+ * try_cmpxchg() is robust.  There will be at most one drain operation started
+ * per sixteenth of a second from use of this function, which means that
  * callers might needlessly wait a second or three.
  *
  * This is intended for use by test suites to avoid OOM by flushing RCU
@@ -4016,14 +4016,24 @@ static void rcu_barrier_throttled(void)
 	while (time_in_range(j, old, old + HZ / 16) ||
 	       !try_cmpxchg(&rcu_barrier_last_throttle, &old, j)) {
 		schedule_timeout_idle(HZ / 16);
-		if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence, s)) {
-			smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
-			return;
-		}
 		j = jiffies;
 		old = READ_ONCE(rcu_barrier_last_throttle);
 	}
-	rcu_barrier();
+	/*
+	 * kfree_rcu() can retain objects outside the ordinary callback lists in
+	 * per-CPU SLUB sheaves and kvfree_rcu batches.  Always drain those queues:
+	 * an ordinary barrier does not establish that this work was drained.
+	 */
+	kvfree_rcu_barrier();
+	/*
+	 * A completed barrier can still cover ordinary callbacks queued before
+	 * our entry snapshot.  Otherwise, retain an explicit ordinary barrier
+	 * without depending on the implementation of kvfree_rcu_barrier().
+	 */
+	if (rcu_seq_done(&rcu_state.barrier_sequence, s))
+		smp_mb(); /* caller's subsequent code after above check. */
+	else
+		rcu_barrier();
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.55.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-10 10:11 [PATCH 0/1] rcu: drain kfree_rcu sheaves from the userspace barrier hook Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 12:03   ` Harry Yoo
2026-09-10 13:46     ` Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 15:37       ` Harry Yoo
2026-09-10 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] rcu: make userspace barrier hook drain kvfree_rcu work Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 17:00   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-10 17:51     ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-11  3:40       ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Matthias Goergens
2026-09-11  3:40         ` Matthias Goergens [this message]
2026-09-11 15:44           ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911034059.3569914-2-matthias.goergens@gmail.com \
    --to=matthias.goergens@gmail.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox